Devil may care
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2010
- Messages
- 35,976
Nice ball for Park's first chance but wasn't in the game enough for the most part, defensively he still does better than most of our midfielders though.
He was supposed to be marking Elokobi for the first goal though.Nice ball for Park's first chance but wasn't in the game enough for the most part, defensively he still does better than most of our midfielders though.
A fair assessment.Carrick did well I thought. Problem for both Carrick and Gibson tonight was that I think they are a bit samey in the way they defend. Hence defensively they both looked out of sorts IMO. Carrick and Fletcher or a triple of Carrick-Fletcher-Scholes is a much better combination in that they complement each other well.
I think Carrick could've moved in ahead of Elokobi and occupied the space before he got there, or did he also let his man get ahead of him?Nah there were three on three; Smalling had the man at the front, Carrick the man at the back and Gibson the man in the middle. Carrick and Smalling were both tight on their men and stayed there throughout, Gibson left a couple of yards in between him and Elokobi before the corner was taken and lost him thereafter.
Best since the Community Shield. Not surprising given he's only started 4 games since then (including today).Best game in ages.
Now pleeeeeeeeeeease keep it up, Michael, there's a good lad.
Doesnt say much though.Best game in ages.
Now pleeeeeeeeeeease keep it up, Michael, there's a good lad.
Really? You need to pay a bit more attention.Besides the pass to Park i did not see alot more form Carrick. Shocker how bad his fornm is.
It was the best fecking pass of the match.Besides the pass to Park i did not see alot more form Carrick. Shocker how bad his fornm is.
Actually I thought Gibson was the one that lost his man for the first goal. Completely out of order.He was supposed to be marking Elokobi for the first goal though.
Yeah, Gibson was to blame for that goal.Actually I thought Gibson was the one that lost his man for the first goal. Completely out of order.
He played a damn sight better last night than either of them did against Stoke.The thing is, even with Fletcher and now Scholes struggling to find their best form, I highly doubt Carrick did enough in this match to displace one of the aforementioned players.
You think he will play against Spurs if we play a 4-4-2?He played a damn sight better last night than either of them did against Stoke.
Granted the opposition was stronger but Fletcher and Scholes were both very poor last weekend IMO.
Think Carrick and Fletcher should play every time we play a 4-4-2.You think he will play against Spurs if we play a 4-4-2?
Scholes has been great in some games though?Think Carrick and Fletcher should play every time we play a 4-4-2.
Passing yes, off the ball in a 4-4-2 we just get overrun with him in the midfield. Imo its a major reason why we have been struggling defensively this year and Fletcher has looked out of form. If you look at the stats Fletcher and Carrick both cover a huge amount of ground (interestingly Carrick usually more than Fletch), and this is something Scholsey is just not able to do unfortunately.Scholes has been great in some games though?
It is criminal how much you underrate Carrick. He was brilliant today and dominated midfield and was great in our attacking play as well as defensive clean-up.Brain fart in the 93rd minute but apart from that OK.
Nothing to wank over.
He played OK, nothing to wank over.It's not even funny how much you underrate Carrick. He was brilliant today and dominated midfield and was great in our attacking play as well as defensive clean-up.