17
This is what I think too, and I always find it difficult to believe I’m in such a minority. I think he’ll go on to be a great player, I just wouldn’t like to predict where he’ll do it.
Yeah but he's 20, innitGarnacho vs Attacking midfielders/Wingers in the top five leagues.
"Why don't we create anything?"
Garnacho vs Attacking midfielders/Wingers in the top five leagues.
"Why don't we create anything?"
Once again over simplifying things. It isn't an either or situation. They can both be not good enough
Yes but Garnacho's chances to develop into a good player are far greater than Amorim's to become a decent manager, for us at least.
If Garnacho was showing the requisite humility and development that one would expect from a young player, I think people would give him a lot more leeway. Instead, you have him throwing a strop when he gets subbed and letting it be known via social media that he's feeling hard done by when he doesn't start a match (despite being underwhelming in the vast majority of matches that he did start.) I don't remember Amad (or any parasitic siblings) doing that, despite far worse treatment by Ten Hag. I think Garnacho could turn out to be a decent player, but if we were offered 60+ for him, we'd be mad not to take it.
Meh not sure i agree. Feel like Garnacho prob world be better suited to a different league
You need to learn how to detect sarcasm. I was obviously taking the piss
What I do now is that Garnacho did more than Mount and even if it's high risk/low reward with him, it's better than Mount who was completely harmless.
Garnacho at least, had a decent shot on target as soon as being introduced.
Garnacho vs Attacking midfielders/Wingers in the top five leagues.
"Why don't we create anything?"
Does anyone though? Maybe Yoro but beyond that?
He was benched and subbed for Mount late on in both games. That’s as much as i remember to be fair, I remember Mount being absolute crap thought.
To further back this up, he is doing ok for his age. Its not his fault we don’t have senior players pulling their weight and lessening the burden."Because we're relying on a 20 year old"
However he is the player that creates something. He gets shots on target and like against Spurs, hes the one who makes the goalkeeper work
Fair enough. Still don't think he deserved the start based off of "iv'e played more" but he definitely should have been introduced earlier then 70 min mark. Half time would have been perfect.
If Amorim after 7-8 months can’t predict the likeliest goalscorer between Garnacho and Mount then he is incompetent and out of depth.
My point being , did Mount deserve to start more than Garnacho?
Hell no. Garnacho at least makes things happen.
False.
Honestly, probably not. Don't think any of the forwards that started covered themselves in glory in games prior to the final.
Why would his replacement slow the team down? Do you think Cunha plays at a slow pace or something?
In an ideal world we'd keep him. But the facts are that we need to make sacrifices for cost reasons and he would actually fetch enough money to get a much better 10 in the door through Eze or Mbuemo as examples.To further back this up, he is doing ok for his age. Its not his fault we don’t have senior players pulling their weight and lessening the burden.
in general this season our starters have been rubbih and we've recovered in the 2nd half when we could.
I agree, i can also understand him starting Hojlund because there’s nobody else, but Mount? Over Garnacho? It was stupid. Or forget Garnacho, Ugarte and Bruno further forward i could still understand.
He should have just started Zirkzee and tried to get a lead early. At least Hojlund could work later on the counter. ETH dropped Hojlund for the FA cup final. We don’t win it if he plays
I’d agree with you but there are many other players that can be sacrificed before we let him go.
Number 10’s tend to be slower, and weaker than most other players on the pitch. There’s a reason why most teams don’t accommodate them, we’ve decided we’ll accommodate two for some odd reason.
