OverratedOpinion
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2017
- Messages
- 15,792
If they start charging £64m for bread then I'll be fecked. I live off sandwiches
I can afford £2.50 for a loaf of bread from the bakery, but I go for the supermarket own brand £1 loaf because it's better value and good enough, rather than not ever buying bread. Isn't that basic common sense to find value in the money we spendI love this comment.
I wont buy bread any more- i think its too expensive.
Seriously?! You can get a loaf from the bakery for £2,5?I can afford £2.50 for a loaf of bread from the bakery, but I go for the supermarket own brand £1 loaf because it's better value and good enough, rather than not ever buying bread. Isn't that basic common sense to find value in the money we spend
There’s no way anyone was paying a fee for Ugarte, he’d have been a loan at best.A few things have screwed us over a bit, rashford and ugarte.
Rashford coming might be a blessing, we need a left forward too and the prices right now are laughable.A few things have screwed us over a bit, rashford and ugarte.
Problem is will mean we don't sign LBRashford coming might be a blessing, we need a left forward too and the prices right now are laughable.
Im more convinced we will, I dont get the correlation you're making to be honest. We are briefing selling Amass too.Problem is will mean we don't sign LB
Is that the actual price they're asking? If it is why the hell are we not trying ?/ Surely he'll pick us over CHelsea.64m seems like a relative bargain when you consider the prices this summer.
Why not? If we’ve saved money by bringing rashford back for a season (and I don’t see that being a bad thing given I’m totally presuming there might be a respect from rashford towards Carrick given his history with us) , the money we’re saved could go towards Hall.Problem is will mean we don't sign LB
Saved money in one sense, took on 300k a week wages in another sense for someone who wasn't at the races for us for quite some timeWhy not? If we’ve saved money by bringing rashford back for a season (and I don’t see that being a bad thing given I’m totally presuming there might be a respect from rashford towards Carrick given his history with us) , the money we’re saved could go towards Hall.
A Hall / Rashford left side, along with the new youth signing (Thompson) would really not be bad if we got a good season out of Rashford.
We have the expansive passer in Tielemans, ok not to a Kroos or Modric Level but still. However I agree we do need more of that destroyer type than this kind of profile now.I don't think he's what we need anyway, we need an expansive passer or a proper 6 destroyer. Instead of Santos would have made sense but not both of them.
I suspect if Chelsea get Scott they'll be left with the better player of the two but it's close enough that it's yet to be determined.
Is that the actual price they're asking? If it is why the hell are we not trying ?/ Surely he'll pick us over CHelsea.
I don't think he's what we need anyway, we need an expansive passer or a proper 6 destroyer. Instead of Santos would have made sense but not both of them.
I suspect if Chelsea get Scott they'll be left with the better player of the two but it's close enough that it's yet to be determined.
Possibly right, and the same goes for Anderson / Fernandez etc. overinflated. But Anderson could also be their central Midfield kingpin for the next 7-10 years and they’d be laughing at the figure they spent as he’d be well worth it if they won another few leagues / CLSaved money in one sense, took on 300k a week wages in another sense for someone who wasn't at the races for us for quite some time
It's a huge IF we get a good season out of him but hopefully we do
I really think the club are being shrewd in letting the media think we are skint but I really don't buy into it at all. I believe we have set maximum prices we are willing to pay for players and Scott's valuation is seemingly higher than we think he is worth. It's less us not being able to afford him and more we don't think he's worth what is being demanded.
64m seems like a relative bargain when you consider the prices this summer.
Makes sense given the market.But they outright rejected that. They want something closer to £90m apparently.
Of course he is.
We really need other positions more than left forward, hes likely to not play many matches.Rashford coming might be a blessing, we need a left forward too and the prices right now are laughable.
and removing the wages.There’s no way anyone was paying a fee for Ugarte, he’d have been a loan at best.
Even if someone did pay £20m, that would only have likely have meant breaking even in book value given he’s only been here 2 years.
Rashford coming back a blessing? Think I've read it all on here now, some fans need to raise their standards expected of the club from out of the gutter.Rashford coming might be a blessing, we need a left forward too and the prices right now are laughable.
There are people unhappy about welbeck going to Chelsea. At this rate people would love bringing Lingard backRashford coming back a blessing? Think I've read it all on here now, some fans need to raise their standards expected of the club from out of the gutter.
There are people unhappy about welbeck going to Chelsea. At this rate people would love bringing Lingard back
Nah, but if you sign Pogba..*Chelsea sign Lingard*
25 posts saying
"We should be all over this"
Well take a look down our list of highest transfer fees paid. We should be quite happy that we haven't paid 100M going by that lot.I don't why that's such a bad thing. Isak, Rogers, Anderson, Wirtz, Enzo, Grealish, Rice, Caicedo, Lukaku, Tonali. Not many of those have proven themselves to be worth the price.
Nah, but if you sign Pogba..
Rashford coming back a blessing? Think I've read it all on here now, some fans need to raise their standards expected of the club from out of the gutter.
There are people unhappy about welbeck going to Chelsea. At this rate people would love bringing Lingard back.
He’s on about 120k pw/6m a year, which FIFA are covering anyway as compensation for being injured atvthe World Cup, it’s hardly a deal breaker to getting another player in or not.and removing the wages.
The objective of a transfer window is to make the team stronger. You can judge that against different benchmarks.I can afford £2.50 for a loaf of bread from the bakery, but I go for the supermarket own brand £1 loaf because it's better value and good enough, rather than not ever buying bread. Isn't that basic common sense to find value in the money we spend
The objective of a transfer window is to make the team stronger. You can judge that against different benchmarks.
Are we stronger than we were a year ago? Honestly, I doubt it. Replacing Casemiro and his 10 goals is going to be extremely difficult.
The second, and more important, benchmark is the competition. If this transfer window was supposed to close the gap to Arsenal and City, I’d argue the exact opposite has happened. On paper, City, Chelsea and Spurs have all pulled further away from us.
A better analogy would be: a world renowned baker sold a £4 loaf at the Ritz. Hipster bakeries tried to do the same and started charging the same for their bread, using the same hype arguments than the one from the Ritz.I can afford £2.50 for a loaf of bread from the bakery, but I go for the supermarket own brand £1 loaf because it's better value and good enough, rather than not ever buying bread. Isn't that basic common sense to find value in the money we spend
