Ole'sgunnarwin
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2021
- Messages
- 4,251
He's class, so many problems elsewhere, he's a joy to watch.
I’m a huge Amad disciple. Ballon d’Or is quite the push
I hope you’re right
I also think he needs to be RWB. He naturally want to be high up the pitch which pushes the oppo back and instead of 5 at back gives us a much increased attacking look.
And all the stats seem to indicate that too. I think it gets him the ball out wide and with more space to run at people.Looks a better wing-back than a 10.
I think we need to see him with a better RWB to know for sure. The issue is that when he plays with Maz or Dalot they usually stay quite deep so he doesn't have a wide player to play off.Looks a better wing-back than a 10.
I think we need to see him with a better RWB to know for sure. The issue is that when he plays with Maz or Dalot they usually stay quite deep so he doesn't have a wide player to play off.
When he plays RWB he can play the ball between himself and the RAM. We need a RWB who stays high up the pitch and can maintain the width to unlock Amad as a 10.
Surely the plan has to be to play him at RWB with Cunha and Bruno as the 10s? Buy a proper midfielder or 2 so Bruno doesn’t have to play there.
Looks a better wing-back than a 10.
Wasn't his very first goal for us a header against Milan?He's probably our best header of the ball from a technical view.
He has been lacking match rhythm since coming back though, not as sharp as he was before the injury.
Mazraoui simply doesn’t make that aggressive run you'd expect from a true wing-back. That’s exactly why I believe Amad should be starting in that role, especially in home games or matches we’re expected to control.
Do you not get the feeling Amorim wants to play Bruno in the pivot?
Looks a better RWF than a wingback.
Has already had a few very crap defensive showings at WB.
Absolutely disagree.Looks a better RWF than a wingback.
Has already had a few very crap defensive showings at WB.
Depends on the reasoning behind it.Do you not get the feeling Amorim wants to play Bruno in the pivot?
Do you not get the feeling Amorim wants to play Bruno in the pivot?
I could be wrong, but I don't remember him having many earlier in the season. It was just a few moments where he really switched off in recent weeks since he's returned from the injury, which might just be rustiness.Looks a better RWF than a wingback.
Has already had a few very crap defensive showings at WB.
Absolutely disagree.
I could be wrong, but I don't remember him having many earlier in the season.
The part that he looks better as a RWF. By nature of him playing as a wing-back, he often finds himself on the right wing. He allows us to play two number 10's because he's such a brilliant additional threat.With which part?
The part that he looks better as a RWF. By nature of him playing as a wing-back, he often finds himself on the right wing. He allows us to play two number 10's because he's such a brilliant additional threat.
I'm not so sure that Amorim does disagree. Perhaps he does, hence why we were pursuing Quenda, however since that failed to materialise, we haven't been linked with a RWB. I believe Amad is our best option there.Amorim clearly disagrees though right? Hence why he’s played a grand total of 5 games for him at RWB. Likely due to that defensive frailty in a position that is unnatural for him.
You’re basically saying he doesn’t look better as a RWF because as a WB he can be RWF. You aint really making any sense.
In whichever position he’s clearly better in those threatening RWF positions, and he’s clearly not a very good defender.
Started four games there. Also got subbed into that position a couple of times, or started at #10 then got moved back to RWB another couple other times.He’s only played there 4 times in total before the injury.
Started four games there. Also got subbed into that position a couple of times, or started at #10 then got moved back to RWB another couple other times.
I'm not so sure that Amorim does disagree. Perhaps he does, hence why we were pursuing Quenda, however since that failed to materialise, we haven't been linked with a RWB. I believe Amad is our best option there.
We don't play with wide forwards though. We play with two attacking midfielders and a striker. Amad is naturally an attacking player, therefore he's constantly taking up advanced positions as a wing-back. In my view, his best performances for us this season have come as a wing-back. He doesn't need to be a very good defender. He's absolutely brilliant going forward, relative to his peers in that position.
In a similar vein as what I said about Bruno further up the page, it depends on the reasoning behind it.And started what? 16 or so at number 10?
It’s rather obvious where Amorim thinks he’s better off.
And started what? 16 or so at number 10? Or 16 v 5.
It’s rather obvious where Amorim thinks he’s better off.
He's an attacking player, so of course he's better in advanced areas. In Amorim's ideal world, he'd have more attacking options at wing-back. Like I say, he's a massive fan of Quenda (a winger) at wing-back. Amorim would also like Bruno to stay and to pair him with Cunha. That therefore would leave Amad primarily at wing-back.Whether we play with wide forwards or not has no relevance to Amad’s best position.
He’s best in attacking areas out wide.
It absolutely does matter to Amorim that he can defend, hence why a) he rarely plays him there and b) he starts 90% of matches with two defensive players at WB.
