Bulletproof defence. Clearly not your view. Just the view of many (2) others.
Amber Heard vs Johnny Depp | Depp wins on all 3 counts
- Thread starter Reapersoul20
- Start date
If that's your description of her then we know you're a bit biased in her favour. It's as accurate a description as Trump being a guy who "tells it like it is".I think Shamans has hacked him or something.
I think probably because the balanced people have moved on and acknowledge there's nothing more to be said now that the trial has a resolution.
It's only people showing their true colours left grinding their axes.
That is frankly untrue. There have been follow up interviews and talk of book deals etc. that are keeping the story alive.
She was found to have defamed him by talking generally about abuse and is now talking openly about her accusations after they were found false, without any litigation privilege leaving her open for further action, potentially.
People are going to want to talk about that.
Agreed. It's the same after a transfer or a F1 race for example. There's usually interviews and other developments going on after the transfer has completed or the race has finished which people will obviously talk about. Nothing wrong with that is there?
I daren't care about either of them. They both seemed awful people, albeit Johnny clearly has a certain charm and humour. I just find find the witch-hunt masquerading as a quest for justice for a multimillionaire all weird and distasteful.
The race isn't even over in this case, there is an upcoming hearing to enter the judgment and Heard is saying she will appeal.
bet she would dump on your pillow at day 11.
Yeah he doesn't deserve justice, he's a multimillionaire!
What's that got to do with anything?
An allegation that was found to be 'substantially true' by the judge.
Don't try and get rational thought out of Jippy. I said Amber's injuries didn't appear to line up with her descriptions of extreme violence & he responded by accusing me of masturbating whilst fantasizing about beating her up myself.Yeah he doesn't deserve justice, he's a multimillionaire!
What's that got to do with anything?
You seem to have a hate-filled wish for her to lose her freedom, career and solvency that is way beyond some high-minded crusade for justice.
Ageist abuse is unnecessary.
He admitted to headbutting her, mate, you're choosing the wrong hill.
As I understand it, Amber Heard would have to put up a bond of the judgement, $10.35m, as well as interest and attorney fees. Most likely, that is money she simply doesn't have, so I would guess that the talk of appeal is mostly a bit of posturing from her side.
He admitted to an accidental clash of heads. The jury has spoken & the only ones dying on a hill are those still silly enough to defend her.
I think it's at the judge's discretion. If I were the judge and she was acting the way is I would be wanting the bond.
I think the ones with their axes to grind are the ones who occasionally pop in to abuse certain other members and accuse them of being misogynists (amongst other things) to be honest.
It's weird and bizarre and more "vindictive" and "stalkerish" than anyone that's commenting on am ongoing international news story/ trial.
I mean, MichaelRed seems a bit obsessed at this point. I won't comment on his motives, but it's certainly odd.
I don't think I'd count it as an obsession.
Since the trial ended he's posted a handful of times in here, usually on the back of some new thing happening (lawyers interview, appeal discussion, new pictures released etc) so he's not digging up old graves to have a go.
The fact of the matter is that people (at the time) felt he was a misogynist because he didn't believe Amber Heard and said that he didn't (much like the jury).
He got threadbanned for practically no reason while others can call people allsorts of names without a care in the world.
Now his character is being attacked again without much provocation so I'd assume those people are the one with the obsession/ agenda.
The mother of all consolation prizes. Lost $10m and got exposed to the entire world as a liar and an awful person, but at least she's pretty.
Reminds of when Liverpool were crap and used to celebrate Pepe Reina getting the Golden Glove.
I don't see what is vindictive or stalkerish about passing judgement on one person's continued obsession with someone he doesn't know and has no relation to, to the point of hoping they commit a crime so they end up in prison .
They've already committed several crimes & there's nothing wrong with wanting the law to be upheld if they continue to commit further crimes. I don't know why I bother replying to you since you twist everything to fit your narrative. I don't personally know & I'm not related to Hitler but I'm sure you'll excuse me for calling him a bad person. If anything, not knowing or having a relation to a person is important when commenting on their criminal actions. It may shock you but juries aren't typically made up of friends and family of the defendant.
You're not on the jury.
Ah, so the only people that can have an opinion on Amber Heard are her friends, family & the jury. Thanks for clarifying, weird that we have a thread on this topic then since I doubt any of the caf are her friends, family or the jury. It's almost like people are free to discuss what they like.
You passed your judgement on him weeks ago and continue to now.
If I recall correctly you called out his "blatant misogyny" around the time Heard took the stand.
You think he's "obsessed" but you are just projecting your thoughts/ feelings on to him.
Hes posted a handful of times in here in the past 10 days and the most action this thread has seen in weeks is when a couple of posters come in and call people names/ cast aspersions on their character and it kicks off because most are completely baseless and frankly agenda driven IMO.
Thankfully the jury agrees with you, so that argument doesn't really help him.
It's amusing me that the people in here to moan about the people still posting in have themselves sparked up yet another merry-go-round that we've been through numerous times before
On another note #ibelieveamberheard is trending again with plenty of new accounts and replies restricted. Shock. Horror.
Musk must want those off the bill too!
On another note #ibelieveamberheard is trending again with plenty of new accounts and replies restricted. Shock. Horror.
Musk must want those off the bill too!
I see a certain poster is being a condescending prick again.
We're allowed to call people pricks right @Jippy?
We're allowed to call people pricks right @Jippy?
Some people really don't know when to stop digging the hole deeper for themselves.
Don't remember joining any hunt.
The point was it's more than possible that the poster might be happy to see her in prison due to other reasons, like being of the opinion that Heard is the domestic abuser here.
You'd have to avoid most social media to not see the stories recently discussed in here btw.
Out of interest when does this get locked as no longer being a current event, or better yet moved to the Entertainment Forum?
I'm not reopening that debate again, but no it wasn't. That isn't what that verdict meant.
I don't even care much about Depp other than him being a decent actor. But if anyone think Amber's testimony has weight in it, I'm seriously worry about their cognitive function. This is not even debatable at this point.
The above statement is to uk judge as well.
Anyway this should be in entertainment forum now. I don't see how she can appeal. All she has is a mega notebook of hearsay.
The above statement is to uk judge as well.
Anyway this should be in entertainment forum now. I don't see how she can appeal. All she has is a mega notebook of hearsay.
She lied under oath about at least five different topics. Off the top of my head, I would say she clearly lied about the incident leading to Depp losing his finger, alerting TMZ, the donations, writing on the mirror, and the trashing of the trailer park. I’m sure there’s more. The silly thing is, she probably didn’t need to lie about most of that, but she is just too much of a narcissist.
She must have been a nightmare to be an attorney for, to be fair, because she just gave off a horrible vibe on the witness stand. Fake, entitled and constantly lying.
When is her deadline for appeal?
I believe its 30 days from date of judgement. So about another week if thats that case. She's going to have to come up with a good reason for the appeal though. And that judgement of 2 mill in her favour kinda puts the kibosh on her "jury bias" appeal.
Thanks
At a guess, I'd say people who still support Heard haven't seen much of it, and/ or are more interested in the politics rather than the facts.
My view on the UK judge is that he probably has some old fashioned views. He's now retired anyway.