spwd
likes: servals, breasts, rylan clark and zooey
Ah got it. ThanksUnited scouts clearly hadn’t watched him.
Ah got it. ThanksUnited scouts clearly hadn’t watched him.
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. I think the fact that he won the golden gloves in his final season, coupled with the better-than-average performance ratings and the fact that he's still going and still looking ok probably shows that he WAS serviceable at the time but it's clear you'll never agree. De gea was good enough for a season or two after - the need to replace him was overblown by ETH and online tacticos. Yes, he was coming to the end of the road with us but he was fine for a couple of seasons while we prioritised strengthening in more important areas.De Gea was no longer serviceable; he was costing us games.
If that video was Onana you would, quite rightly, be using that as evidence to support the view that he should be replaced. But you don’t like Onana, so there is seemingly a bias there whether you would admit to it not.
De Gea wasn’t good enough then. Onana isn’t good enough now. Now it’s a case of crossing our fingers for Lammens.
The posted video highlights how weak he was at kicking the ball but not many of them are poor goalkeeping. Plenty of them have nothing to do with the keeper at all. You chose a bad video if you wanted to highlight his goalkeeping mistakes. I'm sure there are more suitable ones out there if you want to make that point.We’re not having this discussion in good faith if you can watch that and argue that those mistakes aren’t that bad.
Some of the goalkeeping is abysmal and it contributed to us losing big games.
DDG always had weaknesses. He made defenders worse because he was quiet, didn’t communicate, didn’t organise. He made teams less fluid because he was limited with his feet. He created uncertainty by not commanding his penalty area. But as a sheer shot stopper, he was miraculous. Once that started to go, agree, it was time to move him on. It’s just a shame we have brought in goalkeepers who are undeniably inferior to his current level.Onana being so terrible has led to far too much revisionism over DDG's last few years here.
He was on the decline and was becoming a big problem, and he needed to be replaced.
The fact that we managed to replace him with a keeper who is worse than him does not change the fact that DDG needed to be replaced.
DDG's biggest weakness which started to show more towards the end of his tenure at Utd was his absolute refusal to ever leave his line no matter the circumstances and it cost the team a lot in his last years here. But the thing is Onana is the same as DDG when it comes to that, the guy never leaves his line but he doesnt have the otherworldly shotstopping that DDG had. It's puzzling that whoever made that decision saw DDG's biggest weakness and decided to buy a keeper that had the exact same weakness (while being worse at every other aspect of goalkeeping)DDG always had weaknesses. He made defenders worse because he was quiet, didn’t communicate, didn’t organise. He made teams less fluid because he was limited with his feet. He created uncertainty by not commanding his penalty area. But as a sheer shot stopper, he was miraculous. Once that started to go, agree, it was time to move him on. It’s just a shame we have brought in goalkeepers who are undeniably inferior to his current level.
He won the golden gloves in his last season. Yes he was on the decline but he was not a big problem.Onana being so terrible has led to far too much revisionism over DDG's last few years here.
He was on the decline and was becoming a big problem, and he needed to be replaced.
The fact that we managed to replace him with a keeper who is worse than him does not change the fact that DDG needed to be replaced.
He won the golden gloves in his last season. Yes he was on the decline but he was not a big problem.
Trabzonspor have reportedly increased their offer for Onana, although I'm not sure what their original offer was.
https://www.reddit.com/r/reddevils/s/8Gz5xP5vGS
That source is about as reliable as Onana GK.
All of Ten Hag transfers should be investigated.
He isn’t though, so why even comment?That source is about as reliable as Onana GK.
All of Ten Hag transfers should be investigated.
What was the original offer?Trabzonspor have reportedly increased their offer for Onana, although I'm not sure what their original offer was.
https://www.reddit.com/r/reddevils/s/8Gz5xP5vGS
If it was anything close to 50p we should have took it.Trabzonspor have reportedly increased their offer for Onana, although I'm not sure what their original offer was.
https://www.reddit.com/r/reddevils/s/8Gz5xP5vGS
So, you're calling Onana reliable I guess?That source is about as reliable as Onana GK.
All of Ten Hag transfers should be investigated.
I think we should pay themDo we get any loan fee here? 2-3m hopefully
Yeah would've thought Bayindir would be the one off to TurkeyIts welrd that they go for Onana instead of Bayindir.

Makes perfect sense. There was no way we were going to ride with Lammens, Onana, and Altay - so one of the latter two had to go.
I think it’s entirely possible that he’s both utterly pony and also the best available option we have at the club for the rest of the season. Not sure I really get the gamble on Lammens and Bayindir. One of them we already know is not good enough and the other is coming from a level of football way, way below what he is about to experience
We might have told them only Onana is available because we wanted his wages off.Its welrd that they go for Onana instead of Bayindir.
