Hoof the ball
Full Member
Maybe it's Make Austria Great Again. You ever think about that, chief?Ugh...
Maybe it's Make Austria Great Again. You ever think about that, chief?Ugh...
Hadn’t considered that. You may be rightI honestly think the Glazers have no problem with paying huge wages because they are yanks, so used to it but they can't get their heads around paying huge transfer fees.
That certainly is a part of it, but the Lightning have somewhat bucked that trend in recent years with playoff runs. Thing is that the Rays made the playoffs from 2008 to 2013 but didn’t gain the same percentage of attendance increase (roughly around 13K) as the Lightning did coming out of their absolute hell during much the same time. Granted, hockey is a more violent & intimate sport than baseball, intimate in that many great hockey arenas have stands that are built vertically off the ice to keep the sound of the fans on top of the ice & right in front of the fans, but with the exception of the Lightning winning the Stanley Cup in 2004, the playoff records of both the Rays & the Lightning, expansion teams that came into existence within a couple of years of one another, are somewhat similar. Both have far surpassed the Bucs’ playoff records over the past decade.I am a Yankee fan, so don't you think the problem with the Rays is that a lot of Florida residents have retired down there from other big Cities so already have an allegiance to other teams.
One of the few things that motivated me for next season, giving a shot to the kids in EL, cups, and some isolated games here and there and we won't have it either, apparently.Solskjaer will be charged with getting the type of form from his players which he managed when he arrived. One or two will be promoted, most likely centre-back Axel Tuanzebe. The likes of Angel Gomes and Tahith Chong will be sent on loan. Despite desperate, misguided pleas from fans to play the kids, the kids are not ready.
As long as they get full houses they will be happy. They always say match revenue does not matter. Now if TV revenue dropped because nobody wants to watch us, who knows. Value of sponsorship deals dropping and impacting on the value of the club? Now there is a new shirt coming out, everybody will rush out and buy one. Why not just wear the shirts you already have? Then Adidas will be on their backs and it is them who will lose money. It will be a drip, drip, drip effect and might take years until they have run us into the ground.That certainly is a part of it, but the Lightning have somewhat bucked that trend in recent years with playoff runs. Thing is that the Rays made the playoffs from 2008 to 2013 but didn’t gain the same percentage of attendance increase (roughly around 13K) as the Lightning did coming out of their absolute hell during much the same time. Granted, hockey is a more violent & intimate sport than baseball, intimate in that many great hockey arenas have stands that are built vertically off the ice to keep the sound of the fans on top of the ice & right in front of the fans, but with the exception of the Lightning winning the Stanley Cup in 2004, the playoff records of both the Rays & the Lightning, expansion teams that came into existence within a couple of years of one another, are somewhat similar. Both have far surpassed the Bucs’ playoff records over the past decade.
The Bucs will always have at least 50000 fans in the stadium, so, like the poster who wrote about the attendance rank earlier said, the Glazers will never feel the attendance slipping away due to the welfare state. There are definitely opposing fans en masse in RJ Stadium as well.
I have thought recently what would be the consistent attendance number in OT needs to get to in order to give the Glazers pause & realize how challenging the situation is.
I fully agree with the potential long term deterioration before a rebound occurs.As long as they get full houses they will be happy. They always say match revenue does not matter. Now if TV revenue dropped because nobody wants to watch us, who knows. Value of sponsorship deals dropping and impacting on the value of the club? Now there is a new shirt coming out, everybody will rush out and buy one. Why not just wear the shirts you already have? Then Adidas will be on their backs and it is them who will lose money. It will be a drip, drip, drip effect and might take years until they have run us into the ground.
Of course, but he is a fan the same and it is better seeing all our worries actually in print for a wider audience to read, than us weeping on a fan forum.Stopped reading after 10 paragraphs. He's just repeating what 90% of us know already.
Shows you all you need to know about those cnuts.Best part of this article is the paragraph about how the players are blaming each other about their paycuts. That's where their priorities are: Money not Man Utd. Shows why there's so little effort on the pitch.
Not much, the players decided that now they have to show everybody that Mourinho was the problem, so they upped their game (right from downing the tools they did prior to Mourinho's sacking), went on for a couple of easy games, had a bit of luck against PSG then they believed their own hype and went back to their complacent selves. Then you've got people like Martial who caught fantastic form prior to his contract prolongation just to magically lose it after it was already prolonged.What i don't understand is how we went from 14/19 wins as we entered April, to 2 in 10, just as Ole was appointed as permanent manager
Fatigue? Did the players down tools? Did Ole suddenly decide we should start playing shit? Might be wishful thinking, but i think this is our low point and it can only go up from here.
Yeah I follow NFL, it’s simply not that simple. But whatever.There is no longer 145,000 eager fans on the Bucs' season ticket waiting list like there was in 2007. Since Gruden's departure, the club have had four managers in 10 years with no tangible long-term strategy.
Is it ringing alarm bells yet, United fans?
https://www.manchestereveningnews.c.../man-utd-transfer-glazers-buccaneers-15056099
Ok.Brother, you couldn’t be more wrong with that statement if you needed to.
Which teams?Ole said we could finish behind those teams in his last PC so it could be him.
I think the Liverpool supporters were critical of the owners up until a year or two ago. Get the right manager in and things can turn quickly.feck sake, this is all so depressing right now, every thread, headline and rumour make coming onto these forums so bloody bleak, then you look across to the likes of City and Liverpool and see how well they’re doing, being run and playing and you realise how far we’ve fallen.
Unless these Glazer cnuts and Woodward walk away I’m struggling to see where and when it’ll get any better. *sigh*
Exactly. They lucked-in to getting Klopp.I think the Liverpool supporters were critical of the owners up until a year or two ago.
Exactly, lets not forget Liverpool had a similar issue of out of touch American owners making a mockery of their club before their current one took over and they made an effort to put pressure on them and they sold the club off.But remember, any discussion for fans action is cringeworthy, embarrassing or pointless and anyway, Ed scowled at the camera anyway and gave a look that said 'football manager signings mode'.
Every bit of decline from here, many fans are complicit. When are we going to get real and stop swallowing the shit
This is the problem with Solskjaer being appointed, would any manager with ambition to win things have these three in their like up ?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Wolves and Everton.Which teams?
He didn't say that. That's just telegraph's creative headline.Wolves and Everton.
Smalling extended his contract when Jose was the manager.This is the problem with Solskjaer being appointed, would any manager with ambition to win things have these three in their like up ?
I highly doubt Woodward would have offered extensions without getting the consent from Ole.
Absolute disgrace
No wonder they are grinning like Cheshire cats.We are a disgrace
well we could've lucked into getting him too if Woodward hadn't presented us as some sort of football version of Disneyland.Exactly. They lucked-in to getting Klopp.
Pretty much this. Considering the reaction on here I was expecting at least something in the article but we heard it all before.Stopped reading after 10 paragraphs. He's just repeating what 90% of us know already.
And now everyone think they're great ownersExactly. They lucked-in to getting Klopp.
Do we have to keep trotting this line out? if that's the sole reason Klopp turned us down then he's as much a fool as Woodward. Likelihood is he felt Liverpool were in better shape or that he would not have such intense focus on what he was doing at Liverpool and could put his plan together.well we could've lucked into getting him too if Woodward hadn't presented us as some sort of football version of Disneyland.
I imagine the two are inter-twined.Do we have to keep trotting this line out? if that's the sole reason Klopp turned us down then he's as much a fool as Woodward. Likelihood is he felt Liverpool were in better shape or that he would not have such intense focus on what he was doing at Liverpool and could put his plan together.