justsomebloke
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2020
- Messages
- 6,840
Ironically you've agreed with my entire point while attempting to make out that you're refuting it. It's clearly gone over your head somehow.
The exact signings that we need to be making need to be analytically driven and not NAME driven. Our fans are largely only interested in names they've heard of, if they haven't heard of them, the general consensus becomes "Who is this player? This is not the type of player that Manchester United should be signing etc". If you haven't seen our fans come out with statements like this en masse then I don't know what to tell you, apart from asking you to leave the rock which you've been hiding under. Even in this thread the same spiel is being spun, it's painful to read.
We are not that club currently. Yes we are and always will be 'Manchester United' but currently, as it stands, we need to try a different approach with our signings and sign talented young players with a bright spark/future ahead of them, as opposed to internationally known, world class players. INEOS share the same sentiment as myself, and it's proven in quite literally ALL of their signings so far, with possibly the slight exception of MdL.
Sorry, but what's with the aggro here? I was refuting what you actually wrote in the post I responded to which, ironically, was largely not what you're writing here, but whatever. As far as I can recall, I didn't write a single word in defence of our fans attitude to signings.
Anyway, I strongly agree that our signings need to be analytically driven. I do not agree that this automatically means an emphasis on "unknown" versus "famous" players, which I would consider a rather pointless dividing line. If players are being assessed with an emphasis on analytics, then it comes down to how they fit in relation to what they cost, whether they're internationally famous or not.