Are we the 6th best team in the league?

Sky1981

Fending off the urge
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
30,046
Location
Under the bright neon lights of sincity
If the last 30 are indicators you're not, you can change the stats dramatically by choosing where you want to start them



Your defence is way better than theirs.

Basically, the doom is quick to return here, fair enough, you've been burnt quite a bit in the recent past.

But you have a clear strategy now, it's a good one too and you are exciting to watch, I'm enjoying watching you lot for the first time in years!
So many people said they would be happy with just that change this season.

Then the penalties ... people miss them, it happens, if those two had gone in I doubt any of the "are we 6th best in the league" "wake up call" "we aren't great" threads would exist, 2 pens that's a tiny difference and I still don't understand how Rashford's didn't go in! Finally remember Palace beat city at the Etihad last season, Newcastle just beat Spurs, these results happen, like you were against Wolves, you were clearly the better team, if you were getting beat comprehensively (like you were at Everton last season) then fine, but you're not.

I know people are pissed off, but I wouldn't write off your season yet, your front 3 have scored 2 each them in 3 games, you are creating (22 shots against palace, 11 against Chelsea, 9 against Wolves) your front 3 have pace to burn, things are changing at OT give it a bit of time, this team will only improve as the season goes on.
So. Where do you think we are at the moment? 6th? 5th!
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,020
Location
Canada
At gunpoint I'd say 6th because if I was naming Chelsea's best possible XI I probably wouldn't include Giroud, Pedro, Loftus-Cheek, Barkley, Willian, Mount, Alonso, Reece James or Zouma and that seems like enough depth to squeak past us.

If we lose Pogba or McTominay for a few games we might be in real trouble in midfield and it's tough to see us finding 6th place level production from the #10 or RW spots, whereas Chelsea don't really have any positions where you'd say they're basically a 12th-18th place quality side.

We have the better defence, but Chelsea and definitely Arsenal have more goals in them.

Worth noting that it's easier to see us signing an attacking midfielder in January and it helping us a ton, whereas Arsenal probably aren't going to seriously address their defensive issues and Chelsea can't. So, if we sign a winger or 10, maybe?
So the team we just hammered 4-0 is better than us? Makes sense.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,020
Location
Canada
I like how many disregard Chelsea. A side who make loads of chances with attacking football, & if they can get better defensively will be a threat. Compared to us who hardly create anything, unless playing an attacking team. Five shots on goal total against defensive Wolves & Palace says it all.
"If they can get better defensively". All signs point to them not being good defensively. At all. That's been our downfall over the years while last year there was absolutely nothing between the 4 top 4 challenging sides last season in attacking stats. So with us massively improving our defence, we'll see a big difference over the season.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,020
Location
Canada
Why the feck are people discounting Chelsea? They finished third last season, and Hazard apart they still got the same team as last year.
Their 3rd was hardly impressive. They lost the player who carried them for 5+ years. They lost their manager. Their defence is atrocious. They arent going to be close to top 4 this year IMO.
 

Frank Grimes

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
8,643
Location
Newbies 15/16 FPL Champion.
"If they can get better defensively". All signs point to them not being good defensively. At all. That's been our downfall over the years while last year there was absolutely nothing between the 4 top 4 challenging sides last season in attacking stats. So with us massively improving our defence, we'll see a big difference over the season.
He's right though. Creating is the hardest aspect of the game and Chelsea can iron out there defensive misgivings a lot easier than we can our side to side passing lack of creativity problem. I fancy Chelsea to finish above us once Kante is fully fit.
 

gerdm07

Thinks we should have kept Pereira
Joined
Aug 8, 2011
Messages
2,751
Why are aerials won so important in the ratings. I could think of 5 or 6 more important numbers.
 

Amarsdd

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
3,299
If the last 30 are indicators you're not, you can change the stats dramatically by choosing where you want to start them



Your defence is way better than theirs.

Basically, the doom is quick to return here, fair enough, you've been burnt quite a bit in the recent past.

But you have a clear strategy now, it's a good one too and you are exciting to watch, I'm enjoying watching you lot for the first time in years!
So many people said they would be happy with just that change this season.

Then the penalties ... people miss them, it happens, if those two had gone in I doubt any of the "are we 6th best in the league" "wake up call" "we aren't great" threads would exist, 2 pens that's a tiny difference and I still don't understand how Rashford's didn't go in! Finally remember Palace beat city at the Etihad last season, Newcastle just beat Spurs, these results happen, like you were against Wolves, you were clearly the better team, if you were getting beat comprehensively (like you were at Everton last season) then fine, but you're not.

I know people are pissed off, but I wouldn't write off your season yet, your front 3 have scored 2 each them in 3 games, you are creating (22 shots against palace, 11 against Chelsea, 9 against Wolves) your front 3 have pace to burn, things are changing at OT give it a bit of time, this team will only improve as the season goes on.
I've seen more sensible posts from non-United fans here than the United fans in the last week.
 

The Boy

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
4,363
Supports
Brighton and Hove Albion
So. Where do you think we are at the moment? 6th? 5th!
Who knows, we're only 3 games in - but what you can see from Utd is progression and that's the first season I've been able to write that for a while
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,020
Location
Canada
He's right though. Creating is the hardest aspect of the game and Chelsea can iron out there defensive misgivings a lot easier than we can our side to side passing lack of creativity problem. I fancy Chelsea to finish above us once Kante is fully fit.
We have created far more chances and better quality chances than Chelsea have so far though? Last season as well, we created better quality chances than they did over the whole season and especially with Ole. On paper as well we are much better going forward. So why exactly do some people think they have a better attack? We just fecking beat them 4-0 where yeah, they had a couple of half chances, but nothing apart from that and hardly tested us apart from 2 shots from half chances that hit the woodwork.

So comparing us to Chelsea, we have a better defence then them, and we create more chances than them and have better players in attack than they do. Yet you think they'll do better? Perfect example of the fecking dramatic nature of people on here and lack of perspective. All the top 4 challengers will be inconsistent, we just beat one supposed challenger 4-0 yet people seemingly forget that instantly and just assume they'll be good?

As for sorting out defensive misgivings being easy... Come on. That obviously isn't the case. Time and time again it's been shown that if you play an open, expansive style of football, if you just don't have the quality of players at the back, you won't be solid. Lampard wants to play attacking football, but they haven't been tremendously creative. Even still, they've been woeful at the back. The only way they get stronger defensively is by pulling them back quite a bit, along with Kante getting back to his best (which he hasn't been in a few years).
 

Frank Grimes

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
8,643
Location
Newbies 15/16 FPL Champion.
We have created far more chances and better quality chances than Chelsea have so far though? Last season as well, we created better quality chances than they did over the whole season and especially with Ole. On paper as well we are much better going forward. So why exactly do some people think they have a better attack? We just fecking beat them 4-0 where yeah, they had a couple of half chances, but nothing apart from that and hardly tested us apart from 2 shots from half chances that hit the woodwork.

So comparing us to Chelsea, we have a better defence then them, and we create more chances than them and have better players in attack than they do. Yet you think they'll do better? Perfect example of the fecking dramatic nature of people on here and lack of perspective. All the top 4 challengers will be inconsistent, we just beat one supposed challenger 4-0 yet people seemingly forget that instantly and just assume they'll be good?

As for sorting out defensive misgivings being easy... Come on. That obviously isn't the case. Time and time again it's been shown that if you play an open, expansive style of football, if you just don't have the quality of players at the back, you won't be solid. Lampard wants to play attacking football, but they haven't been tremendously creative. Even still, they've been woeful at the back. The only way they get stronger defensively is by pulling them back quite a bit, along with Kante getting back to his best (which he hasn't been in a few years).
We hit Chelsea on the counter but they are much better at controlling the play than us and creating chances. They also have a better squad than us. If Pogba gets injured we have no hope. Chelsea have a midfield of Kante, Jorginho, Kovacic Mount, Barkley, Pulisic, Loftus Cheek and Hudson Odoi. That's vastly superior to United's. They also have Alonso and Zappacosta as FB cover and Giroud as back up up front. Their squad is superior and it will show.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,020
Location
Canada
We hit Chelsea on the counter but they are much better at controlling the play than us and creating chances. They also have a better squad than us. If Pogba gets injured we have no hope. Chelsea have a midfield of Kante, Jorginho, Kovacic Mount, Barkley, Pulisic, Loftus Cheek and Hudson Odoi. That's vastly superior to United's. They also have Alonso and Zappacosta as FB cover and Giroud as back up up front. Their squad is superior and it will show.
They have a better midfield, that's it. And yeah we hit them on the counter? That's a perfectly valid way of playing? We beat them 4-0 while De Gea literally had no real save to make. Its laughable seeing anyone claim they are better than us this season, and that will show over the year, I guarantee it.

People are too dramatic. Liverpool and City are the 2 best sides in the league, and Spurs should be 3rd, but past that, there isnt anyone who has a better squad or starting 11 really.we'll see how the season plays out, but I'd say its very clearly between United and Arsenal for 4th, with the potential of Spurs falling behind in that group, while Chelsea will be in the 6th-9th group. I'll be shocked if they are close to top 4.

I know people love to shit on United on here while ignoring the frailties of other teams... but seriously. We just hammered them 2 weeks ago. Don't you see how funny is it to claim they are better? If they were better, they sure as feck wouldn't lose 4-0 to us. On paper they aren't better, they aren't better in statistical performances during the season both in chance creation and in defensive ability, and they aren't better than us in the actual result on the pitch between the 2.
 

Amerifan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
986
1 City
2 Liverpool due to injuries and weaker bench

— gap —

3 Spurs

— gap —

4 Arsenal benefitting from manager stability and a good transfer window
5-6 United and Chelsea with talent but novice managers and youth learning mistakes
7-8 Wolves, Leister though either could reach 4th
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,107
Location
Where the grass is greener.
There’s player improvement in a couple of defensive positions, but that shouldn’t be confused with progression, which there is none of thus far.
 

markhrad

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2014
Messages
1,100
Location
St. Kitts
Any place between 4th and 8th is where I see us, so 6th is a fair bet. We have to face facts most teams in Europe that have our name recognition tend to buy success. We seem caught up in trying to push our academy players into situations that they are either not prepared for or simply not good enough to handle.
I think we should buy creative and hardworking midfielders to surround Pogba. Push Pogba further up and let him interplay with Martial and a world class striker. Then introduce 1 or 2 youngsters occasionally and see if they can fit in.
 

Denis' cuff

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
7,771
Location
here
At gunpoint I'd say 6th because if I was naming Chelsea's best possible XI I probably wouldn't include Giroud, Pedro, Loftus-Cheek, Barkley, Willian, Mount, Alonso, Reece James or Zouma and that seems like enough depth to squeak past us.

If we lose Pogba or McTominay for a few games we might be in real trouble in midfield and it's tough to see us finding 6th place level production from the #10 or RW spots, whereas Chelsea don't really have any positions where you'd say they're basically a 12th-18th place quality side.

We have the better defence, but Chelsea and definitely Arsenal have more goals in them.

Worth noting that it's easier to see us signing an attacking midfielder in January and it helping us a ton, whereas Arsenal probably aren't going to seriously address their defensive issues and Chelsea can't. So, if we sign a winger or 10, maybe?

I think 10 wingers is overdoing it a bit, tbh.
 

The Boy

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
4,363
Supports
Brighton and Hove Albion
Progression? You call this progress? Based on what?
Based on the fact that I can see how you're actually set up, high press, fast transitional play, a fluid attack - yes it doesn't always happen but there is a clear plan, everyone knows what they're meant to do and the space they're expected to exploit.

I couldn't see how you were meant to play under Mou as it chopped and changed so often depending on who was in favour or which team you were playing. Under LvG it was clear what you were meant to do but it was painfully dull to watch.

Now after 1 transfer window and one preseason, there is a strategy. You may not have got who you wanted and what you wanted in the window, but not getting Bale and Dybala for instance show a clear strategy. You also have a strategy on the pitch, whether it works or not is subjective and too early to tell, but it's a feck of alot more fun to watch than anything you've served up for years. So yes I call that progress.
 

Sky1981

Fending off the urge
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
30,046
Location
Under the bright neon lights of sincity
Based on the fact that I can see how you're actually set up, high press, fast transitional play, a fluid attack - yes it doesn't always happen but there is a clear plan, everyone knows what they're meant to do and the space they're expected to exploit.

I couldn't see how you were meant to play under Mou as it chopped and changed so often depending on who was in favour or which team you were playing. Under LvG it was clear what you were meant to do but it was painfully dull to watch.

Now after 1 transfer window and one preseason, there is a strategy. You may not have got who you wanted and what you wanted in the window, but not getting Bale and Dybala for instance show a clear strategy. You also have a strategy on the pitch, whether it works or not is subjective and too early to tell, but it's a feck of alot more fun to watch than anything you've served up for years. So yes I call that progress.
I see same old shit under jose. But each to his own i guess
 

Suedesi

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
23,873
Location
New York City
Their 3rd was hardly impressive. They lost the player who carried them for 5+ years. They lost their manager. Their defence is atrocious. They arent going to be close to top 4 this year IMO.
Hardly call Sarri a loss, I think they achieved 3rd despite of Sarri not because of him. They finished ahead of Spurs and Arsenal and won the EL, so they did well considering.

Their defense is fine, as soon as Rudiger comes back. It's true Hazard is a loss, but Pulisic might just soften the blow.
 

The Boy

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
4,363
Supports
Brighton and Hove Albion
I see same old shit under jose. But each to his own i guess
I am genuinely surprised by that. For me, the difference in your football, the mood around the club and how you operated in the transfer market are so different it's like comparing night and day!
 

PieCrust

Full Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2015
Messages
1,592
I see same old shit under jose. But each to his own i guess
For me it's more like the same old shit under LVG, with the difference that we press with more intensity now. But all we do while in possession is knock the ball around to the CB's for 75 minutes and then chase the game at the end.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,121
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
I am genuinely surprised by that. For me, the difference in your football, the mood around the club and how you operated in the transfer market are so different it's like comparing night and day!
We’re definitely missing things still, but I see the clear direction of travel now. Kinda similar to when Klopp first came in. Issue is with that, is we need to buy a CM/RW in the Ilk of VVD transfer. Sancho would do that, but we need to be in CL to get him, which no one can guarantee right now.
 

The Boy

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
4,363
Supports
Brighton and Hove Albion
We’re definitely missing things still, but I see the clear direction of travel now. Kinda similar to when Klopp first came in. Issue is with that, is we need to buy a CM/RW in the Ilk of VVD transfer. Sancho would do that, but we need to be in CL to get him, which no one can guarantee right now.
Agree with this - you’ve got a way to go yet but that’s what happens when you switch philosophy every time you change your manager. But for me it looks like finally you’re heading in the right direction
 

Sky1981

Fending off the urge
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
30,046
Location
Under the bright neon lights of sincity
Fair enough - but that must be quite a miserable way to watch football
Both are miserable. But between winning while playing badly and losing beautifully it'd pick winning badly.

There's no enjoyment in our predicament. Beaten by half the teams in the league while seeing city and pool raked up pts after pts.

And i dont see our supposed youth products worth any excitement, lingard and rashford are fast becoming the supermega star we all loathe.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,121
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
Agree with this - you’ve got a way to go yet but that’s what happens when you switch philosophy every time you change your manager. But for me it looks like finally you’re heading in the right direction
I’m excited for you boys, I have a lot of time for Potter and I like the look of Trossard and Maupay. Throw Webster in the mix and you will have probably changed your style of play completely as well! although I had a lot of time for Hughton, think bad transfer decisions caught up with him.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,722
xG model is rated highly by few isn't it? Going by that model, we created 3rd most goal scoring chances and have the best defensive record. Also have the 2nd most expected points going by chances created.

We have obvious problems, can't ignore that especially when it comes to creating quality chances or taking the shots quickly by making space with quick feet.
 

AlwaysRed66

Full Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2016
Messages
1,897
We also need to take into account that our manager is the worst of the top 6, without looking at our team.
 

Kurton

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
197
If I was Ole, once EL starts I would put everything in it and just make sure that we are in the top half of the table for the rest of the season. We do not have resources to sustain in both and we are not doing much PL anyway. We should have enough to around stay in the top half of the table. Just hope that Arsenal gets eliminated in the early stages of EL.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,020
Location
Canada
Hardly call Sarri a loss, I think they achieved 3rd despite of Sarri not because of him. They finished ahead of Spurs and Arsenal and won the EL, so they did well considering.

Their defense is fine, as soon as Rudiger comes back. It's true Hazard is a loss, but Pulisic might just soften the blow.
Sarri did a very decent job for them overall and they'll do worse without him IMO. Pulisic is alright but is young and in a new league, don't think he'll be anything amazing. Also their defence most definitely is not fine. They leak space all over the pitch and can be got at so easily. Rudiger isn't some world class player that'll fix that on his own without Lampard dramatically changing tactics. They'll adapt over the year, but in terms of defending, it'll almost certainly be a massive problem for them and that's not an easy thing to fix. Also going forward they really aren't great with creativity so far. Not awful, but not great. The only actual position where they are better than us is in midfield, but they are very far off in both boxes.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,881
Location
Somewhere out there
I'm not sure I'd trust anything as a reliable indicator that says Newcastle are better than us.

6th was about right. Leicester are the closest team to the top six and we were better than them last year. Arguably about level with Spurs, Chelsea and Arsenal but when we were bad we were worse than any of those. It's going to be skewed considering how awful some of our performances under Jose were.
Nailed it noods.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,152
Why the feck are people discounting Chelsea? They finished third last season, and Hazard apart they still got the same team as last year.
Think you answered your own question there.
 

DiceRoller

Full Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2014
Messages
412
Location
Dublin
We will be no higher than 6th. I'm super confident about this and actually had a £50 bet on before season started. We messed up the window, its plain and simple, we are not as good as we were last season in midfield or attack and we were bad enough last year.

Will get £1900 returns so that should soften the blow.
You got 38/1 that Utd would finish no higher than 6th? What bookies and when did you place it?
Strange considering there are three teams you’d expect us to be behind which means we’re 4th at best but with two other close rivals (Ars, Che) who could easily finish 4th/5th ahead of us.

Find those odds hard to believe.
 

Nick7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
19,311
Location
Ireland
I don't think we're worse than Arsenal or Chelsea. Tottenham aren't that much better either.
 

Canagel

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
13,888
I said 6th place before the season and I didn't see much to change my opinion. It could potentially be lower if our key players like Pogba and Martial get injured.
 

NJM78

New Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
6,345
Location
Cardiff
You got 38/1 that Utd would finish no higher than 6th? What bookies and when did you place it?
Strange considering there are three teams you’d expect us to be behind which means we’re 4th at best but with two other close rivals (Ars, Che) who could easily finish 4th/5th ahead of us.

Find those odds hard to believe.

You'd be very right to not believe them :lol: Sorry typo, 190 quid returns. Did it with Betfred after we had signed Daniel James.

1900 would have definitely softened the blow but very much hardened something else.