mark_a
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2008
- Messages
- 1,272
Ownership & running of the club. The lack of a succession plan for SAF was the first warning sign for me (after the Glazers takeover). Then, sure enough, he retires and we are where we are. The reason we are where we are is that I don't think the club knew how to run without a figure like Sir Alex. So if viewed from an owners point of view, in business terms, you'd have wanted to understand how the business worked. However, I suspect they did understand how the business side of the club worked, but not the business of the football side! That was running itself, right?
The standard model for someone buying a club would be to buy a club not doing that well, with room for improvement. That way you can invest in an asset to improve it, thus getting a return on your investment. In that model, an unavoidable part of it is to improve the football, without that you're not going to attract the sponsors etc. United was different, here was a cash cow, flying high. An investment they didn't have to improve, in football terms anyway. Ferguson saying they "didn't interfere". That's good. Maybe until you need the club to "interfere"? To "interfere" to sort out a plan of how to follow the legacy of one of the greatest managers in English football?
Anyway, that's my answer: I'm unhappy with how the club is run. We lack a direction (evidenced by the poor managerial appointments) stemming from a lack of a clear understanding on how a successful club actually works
The standard model for someone buying a club would be to buy a club not doing that well, with room for improvement. That way you can invest in an asset to improve it, thus getting a return on your investment. In that model, an unavoidable part of it is to improve the football, without that you're not going to attract the sponsors etc. United was different, here was a cash cow, flying high. An investment they didn't have to improve, in football terms anyway. Ferguson saying they "didn't interfere". That's good. Maybe until you need the club to "interfere"? To "interfere" to sort out a plan of how to follow the legacy of one of the greatest managers in English football?
Anyway, that's my answer: I'm unhappy with how the club is run. We lack a direction (evidenced by the poor managerial appointments) stemming from a lack of a clear understanding on how a successful club actually works