- Joined
- Nov 6, 2019
- Messages
- 215
Doesn't every player in La Liga have a mandatory release clause?The rule itself is fine. It's when it's paired with mandatory release clauses that it becomes a bit farcical.
Doesn't every player in La Liga have a mandatory release clause?The rule itself is fine. It's when it's paired with mandatory release clauses that it becomes a bit farcical.
ExactlyDoesn't every player in La Liga have a mandatory release clause?
Is there any evidence that Barca even have intention on using this rule? Looks more like journalists figured out something to write about.And how often has this rule had to be applied? They got an advantage based on a rule every single la liga team agreed on. It wasn’t some made up rule on the spot to favor Barca. Every team in the league knew the deal. Only on this forum are people whining about it and ironically it’s not even Madrid fans, who at least accept the rule even if they don’t love it.
It’s not a big deal.
I wanna say they will because we desperately need a #9 but you ha e a point in that it seems like they haven’t contacted any teams yetIs there any evidence that Barca even have intention on using this rule? Looks more like journalists figured out something to write about.
Its been two weeks after the window and release clauses in play it should of took few days, at best they looking at short term loan if anything at all.
Replaced by players they already own, not by other team’s players!Don't really understand people in this thread acting as though Barca have gone cap in hand to the Spanish FA and have been given some kind of special dispensation. It's obviously a pre-existing La Liga registration rule and presumably other sides have taken advantage of it in the past. If one of my FC Andorra players goes down with a broken leg in FM, I can make use of it as well
I would guess that the idea behind buying Griezmann was for him to play false nine, otherwise there was no god reason to buy a second striker that only played in 4-4-2I wanna say they will because we desperately need a #9 but you ha e a point in that it seems like they haven’t contacted any teams yet
It’s absolutely disgraceful. What a joke league.How is it fair Leganes who are in a relegation battle lose their best player and can do nothing about it due to Barcelona activating his release clause?
Makes Igahlo look like Harry Kane.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Done deal.
Do I? I assume there had to be unanimity from all clubs before such a rule was put in place, so they only have themselves to blame in that case. I actually can't believe anyone would've agreed to it in the first place tbh.Quite shocking really. You have to feel for Leganes, what an awful position they have found themselves in.
All players have a minimum release fee clauseCould Leganés or any other club have said no? Surely they didn’t have to sell him if they didn’t want to. It’s definitely a rule that they should look at reviewing and changing though.
Funnily enough, I think that Barcelona and Real Madrid will like the consequence of that move. They will most relax the registration rules and allow older players to be played without registrations which means that the likes of Barcelona and Real Madrid will be able to stash players in their B teams and have a far bigger team than they currently have.Could Leganés or any other club have said no? Surely they didn’t have to sell him if they didn’t want to. It’s definitely a rule that they should look at reviewing and changing though.
Ah shite, I forgot about that in La Liga.All players have a minimum release fee clause
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Wouldn't really make sense to permit it. All it would do is move the problem into the hands of whichever club Leganes purchase a player from, leading the said club making the same request.So they lose a player, the player is not on their books no more. A worse situation than an injury and la Liga says no. It's a comedy league.
This rule will only make sense is the deal is agreed between two clubs, which means selling club after okay with this. In this case selling club didn't agree and Barca just triggered the release clause.Wouldn't really make sense to permit it. All it would do is move the problem into the hands of whichever club Leganes purchase a player from, leading the said club making the same request.
Leganes cant buy a striker because they dont have anyone having a 4 month injury.This rule will only make sense is the deal is agreed between two clubs, which means selling club after okay with this. In this case selling club didn't agree and Barca just triggered the release clause.
Now Barca problem is shifted to Leganes.
And they don't have that player permanently too. Awful situation to be in.Leganes cant buy a striker because they dont have anyone having a 4 month injury.
Barca are going to go for a very cheap player who will play twice a month at the most. It doesn’t really move the needle.
People crying tears over nothing.
It won’t move the needle significantly at all for the squad problems.
It‘s one thing to stick up for your club because they‘re playing within the rules, but to ignorantly state that it‘s not a big deal or it doesn‘t move the needle is very poor and completely false.Only on this forum are people whining about it and ironically it’s not even Madrid fans, who at least accept the rule even if they don’t love it.
It’s not a big deal.