- Joined
- May 10, 2009
- Messages
- 36,722
How is it fair, what if some back up player is injured and club goes on to sign better player.It sounds fair enough as long as the injured player is not allowed to play for at least "X" number of months.
Well personally I don't think it's that unfair as all the clubs in the league will have had to vote for it to be implemented in the first place. I'm sure it's a rule that if you have two players from the same or similar position out for the season then you're allowed to sign a replacement, which I find quite fair tbh and think the PL should implement something similar.This can't be allowed can it? How unfair it is on other clubs, especially one that will have to sell their main striker??
It isn't any kind of special treatment though, all clubs get the same, these are rules that have been voted for.Imagine the meltdown on here if something like that happened with Liverpool rightfully so really, that's bizarre. How can you take a league seriously with that sort of special treatment.
And the player can play in CL? That’s unfair the PL should introduce the same if that’s the case.It isn't any kind of special treatment though, all clubs get the same, these are rules that have been voted for.
So a small club votes against it and now Barca can buy one of their strikers away from them. Very fair.It isn't any kind of special treatment though, all clubs get the same, these are rules that have been voted for.
Probably not.And the player can play in CL? That’s unfair the PL should introduce the same if that’s the case.
They’re allowed a squad of 25 players, with unlimited eligibility for u21s. It’s their fault if they are left short.It sounds fair enough as long as the injured player is not allowed to play for at least "X" number of months.
Suarez is injured too. Their only fit attackers at the minute are Messi and Griezmann. Ansu Fati too (16 years old).What's happened to Suarez and Messi? Griezmann?
Absolute bullshit. They have just had a transfer window, they've got a squad, nobody else's fault but their own that they're stupid.
I understand when all 3-4 goalkeepers are injured, that's freaky.
It's not like Barcelona always play with strikers anyway, or another outfield player can't fill that role.
CL registration deadline has long passed.And the player can play in CL? That’s unfair the PL should introduce the same if that’s the case.
So they have to get emergency dispensation from La Liga, I thought this only worked for goalkeepers but obviously not so.Although, in England, transfers between clubs in the same league can take place as soon as the last competitive fixtures for the season have been played, many transfers will not be completed until 1 July because many players' contracts expire on 30 June. International transfers into the English leagues (including the Premier League) cannot be made until the window has opened on 17 May. Outside the transfer window, a club may still sign players on an emergency basis, usually if they have no goalkeeper available. Special dispensation from their competition's governing body, for example the Premier League,
Transfers shouldn't be allowed outside the window and free agent window is closed around March if i'm not wrong.Well personally I don't think it's that unfair as all the clubs in the league will have had to vote for it to be implemented in the first place. I'm sure it's a rule that if you have two players from the same or similar position out for the season then you're allowed to sign a replacement, which I find quite fair tbh and think the PL should implement something similar.
When Pogba and McTominay first got their injuries, we should've been able to bring in a replacement under certain circumstances, ie the player must be a loan and hasn't started a certain amount of games for their club like Llorente. It would keep teams being able to compete and ensure further injuries don't occur to other players due to over playing them because of injuries.
So has the transfer window..CL registration deadline has long passed.
Doesn’t make sense as Barcelona have a B team who most probably have loads of fit attackers. Thats what any other club would have to do - play the youngsters.Suarez is injured too. Their only fit attackers at the minute are Messi and Griezmann. Ansu Fati too (16 years old).
It is a bit dodgy - as is literally everything Barcelona do - but it does make sense. They have barely anybody left fit. Self inflicted issue notwithstanding.
What if they just activate a clause?Why do people care? Let them pay through their nose to get an above average striker who will probably never feature when most of the team is fit.
Getafe is in the middle of the top 4 race, they'll never sell their leading striker now.
If he's not in the registered squad for the CL then he won't be able to.And the player can play in CL? That’s unfair the PL should introduce the same if that’s the case.
Have Getafe voted against it? It only says he's on their radar, not that they'll sign him.So a small club votes against it and now Barca can buy one of their strikers away from them. Very fair.