Not really. I mean, they've detained more than 200 people last night for laying down flowers at random memorials, there's no real room for escalation, everyone's rightly scared. And those who could've potentially organized something are either imprisoned or abroad (or killed — not that there were many but more than 0 is more than enough).@harms expecting anything to happen after this or is it going to go the way of Nemtsov?
Another couple years of Russia's economy being bogged down in Ukraine and costs felt more and more at home and I suppose something like this may act as more of a catalyst. All the more reason to get him out the way sooner rather than later.Not really. I mean, they've detained more than 200 people last night for laying down flowers at random memorials, there's no real room for escalation, everyone's rightly scared. And those who could've potentially organized something are either imprisoned or abroad (or killed — not that there were many but more than 0 is more than enough).
I genuinely hope for the chain of events to go as you predict. Nevertheless, a part of me is worried that Putin could exactly find ways to survive and extend his power like Erdogan has done in Turkey, despite the many crises his government went through.Another couple years of Russia's economy being bogged down in Ukraine and costs felt more and more at home and I suppose something like this may act as more of a catalyst. All the more reason to get him out the way sooner rather than later.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Yeah, dictators need dictators at the end of the day, so they prop each other up where possible. They are a dying breed, unfortunately its a long process, generational.I genuinely hope for the chain of events to go as you predict. Nevertheless, a part of me is worried that Putin could exactly find ways to survive and extend his power like Erdogan has done in Turkey, despite the many crises his government went through.
Outside of what this means for Russia, my biggest concern now is that Navalny's death is also a signal for Xi to do exactly the same against Jimmy Lai - the most preeminent voice for democracy in Hong Kong. Now that the Iranian regime already did what they did against the anti-hijab crowd and now that Navalny is no more, all eyes are on the CCP. Fecking dictatorial regimes, man.
A large majority of ordinary Russians say they are largely unaffected by the sanctions.They are due a revolution in Russia. I know they are being fed a lot of propaganda, but surely a large share of the population can see how fecked up their situation is.
We haven't heard a lot about their economy for a while, but it must be severely hit by sanctions and millions of men being away fighting. Can't be good.
Today's main CNN headline: "The Kremlin Has Never Been Richer" -They are due a revolution in Russia. I know they are being fed a lot of propaganda, but surely a large share of the population can see how fecked up their situation is.
We haven't heard a lot about their economy for a while, but it must be severely hit by sanctions and millions of men being away fighting. Can't be good.
They are due a revolution in Russia. I know they are being fed a lot of propaganda, but surely a large share of the population can see how fecked up their situation is.
We haven't heard a lot about their economy for a while, but it must be severely hit by sanctions and millions of men being away fighting. Can't be good.
What's the point of you. You have like 5 post about other things than russia. You have let your mask down so many times (probably drunk) that even the most gullible people know you are nothing but a russian propagandist. Nobody takes anything you write seriously.Today's main CNN headline: "The Kremlin Has Never Been Richer" -
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/02/19/europe/russia-oil-india-shadow-fleet-cmd-intl/index.html
IMF raises Russian GDP forecast again. It's outperforming both Germany and the UK -
https://www.ft.com/content/21a5be9c-afaa-495f-b7af-cf937093144d
Thanks, will give that a watch. I guess it's not nearly as bad as I would have expected.
Not sure about his other posts, but the particular post you referenced are facts mate.What's the point of you. You have like 5 post about other things than russia. You have let your mask down so many times (probably drunk) that even the most gullible people know you are nothing but a russian propagandist. Nobody takes anything you write seriously.
I know. So what? Mate. If you have no idea what you are talking about, you could, you know, not talk.Not sure about his other posts, but the particular post you referenced are facts mate.
I'm convinced he's an actual paid troll. He's mentioned before he lives in St. Petersburg, where the troll farms are based. Registered here around the time they (Internet Research Agency) were set up ready for the Trump campaign, when I'm sure they registered accounts on any remotely popular forum/community around the western world. Posts are often essay's with media links at the ready to back up his half-truth's, as if he does it for a living.What's the point of you. You have like 5 post about other things than russia. You have let your mask down so many times (probably drunk) that even the most gullible people know you are nothing but a russian propagandist. Nobody takes anything you write seriously.
Nope.They are due a revolution in Russia. I know they are being fed a lot of propaganda, but surely a large share of the population can see how fecked up their situation is.
We haven't heard a lot about their economy for a while, but it must be severely hit by sanctions and millions of men being away fighting. Can't be good.
I think the Caf should just boot him out. It's very abnormal that he is a full member with only 93 posts in 10 years.I'm convinced he's an actual paid troll. He's mentioned before he lives in St. Petersburg, where the troll farms are based. Registered here around the time they (Internet Research Agency) were set up ready for the Trump campaign, when I'm sure they registered accounts on any remotely popular forum/community around the western world. Posts are often essay's with media links at the ready to back up his half-truth's, as if he does it for a living.
I'm sure they pay very well for fluent English speakers.
Is somber but proud moment for Brad Fiedel.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Chanting "no to war" as well.The lines looked extremely long. Suspect this isn't turning out how Putin wanted.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
You're much better informed about the Russian domestic situation than I'll ever be and an outstanding poster, hence my question to you and you only: How much of a domestic support and following did Navalny have in Russia? What exactly were his ideas and political program? What would be a credible alternative to Putin? I've done my own research but having a hard time navigating through the waters, and it would be great to hear an informed opinion from someone who lives in Russia.Not really. I mean, they've detained more than 200 people last night for laying down flowers at random memorials, there's no real room for escalation, everyone's rightly scared. And those who could've potentially organized something are either imprisoned or abroad (or killed — not that there were many but more than 0 is more than enough).
It's incredibly hard to properly assess the real support for Navalny in a country with an active military censorship, especially when he and his comrades were labeled, in the eyes of the law, as terrorists. A lot of those who supported him have fled the country since the beginning of the full scale invasion, but overall — it's still in millions, with most of them being relatively young. How many millions would be anyone's guess though. It's certainly not even close to the majority, but it's a considerable number.You're much better informed about the Russian domestic situation than I'll ever be and an outstanding poster, hence my question to you and you only: How much of a domestic support and following did Navalny have in Russia? What exactly were his ideas and political program? What would be a credible alternative to Putin? I've done my own research but having a hard time navigating through the waters, and it would be great to hear an informed opinion from someone who lives in Russia.
Thanks.
Thanks a bunch for for the speedy reply.It's incredibly hard to properly assess the real support for Navalny in a country with an active military censorship, especially when he and his comrades were labeled, in the eyes of the law, as terrorists. A lot of those who supported him have fled the country since the beginning of the full scale invasion, but overall — it's still in millions, with most of them being relatively young. How many millions would be anyone's guess though. It's certainly not even close to the majority, but it's a considerable number.
The last elections he was allowed to participate in were the Moscow mayoral elections of 2013 where he got 27%. That's the official number though and the elections (like all of the Russian elections over the past decade at least) were far from fair. In all likelihood he probably didn't get the majority of the votes but in fair elections he would've gone to the second round with Sobyanin (who luckily enough got just over 50%). That was 2013 though, more than a decade ago... and in Moscow, where Navalny would get more support than overall across the country.
As for his program — he changed it quite a bit but it doesn't really matter. As for his own views, he was a populist, so, aside from the war on corruption & less centralized power hierarchy it's hard to pinpoint which of his political goals were genuine. Most likely in a normal world he would be a right-leaning centrist. But it really doesn't matter as the main goal of the opposition is — and was — to overthrow Putin first and foremost, that's the important bit.
As for who would be the credible alternative to Putin? No idea. He himself does everything to eliminate any potential rivals from his own camp (the last notable one was Medvedev who is know a royal jester). From the opposition? There isn't really a standout figure there anymore. Maybe we'll follow the Belorussian scenario with Yulia Navalnaya taking on the mantle. It's certainly an issue that we don't have a central figure to rally around anymore, not that it was working very well before that.
During the 2020 elections that Lukashenko, by all accounts, lost by some significant margin, the entire opposition voted for a very unlikely candidate — Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, the wife of an actual political opponent of Lukashenko who was in prison at the time (and still, sadly, is). Lukashenko had managed to keep hold of the power though due to some brutal repressions (and with Russia's willing help), but the precedent is there. And she's still considered by a lot of Belarussions to be the legitimate president.My knowledge of Belarus is sadly lacking. Lukashenko is a Russian drone, that much I know, but not enouch on the domestic situation. What do you mean by "Navalnaya taking on the mantle" ? Does she have the means and abilities to build on her husband's legacy?
There's usually a potential successor in the mix but Putin keeps them fairly away from any real power. The current one if we believe the insiders is Aleksey Dyumin, the governor of Tula oblast', but I can guarantee you that the 90% of Russian population doesn't even know who he is. That's the potential weak point of Putin's hierarchy — Putin is too crucial for it's functionality, without him it'll likely crumble in a moment.That's the MO of a successful dictatorship, I've seen it many times before. However the system Putin has built can hardly survive without a "strong man" at its helm. Is there anyone in his court able to preserve and expand on his work? He's not immortal, he knows it and must have been grooming someone, Medvedev not being part of the plan. Is there really no one?
Gotcha, thank you.During the 2020 elections that Lukashenko, by all accounts, lost by some significant margin, the entire opposition voted for a very unlikely candidate — Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, the wife of an actual political opponent of Lukashenko who was in prison at the time (and still, sadly, is). Lukashenko had managed to keep hold of the power though due to some brutal repressions (and with Russia's willing help), but the precedent is there. And she's still considered by a lot of Belarussions to be the legitimate president.
Navalnaya said that she's willing to continue her late husband's work. Whenever she'll be able to do it is yet to be seen, but the precedent is there.
I've done a quick search on him. Not nearly enough to have an informed opinion about him, but I can see why you pointed in his direction.There's usually a potential successor in the mix but Putin keeps them fairly away from any real power. The current one if we believe the insiders is Aleksey Dyumin, the governor of Tula oblast', but I can guarantee you that the 90% of Russian population doesn't even know who he is. That's the potential weak point of Putin's hierarchy — Putin is too crucial for it's functionality, without him it'll likely crumble in a moment.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date