horsechoker
Contained
Sesko wouldn't be getting his hair pulled. Proper street fighter.Calvert Lewin an example of how he should be putting himself about
thought he was weak and we needed much more with 10 men..
Sesko wouldn't be getting his hair pulled. Proper street fighter.Calvert Lewin an example of how he should be putting himself about
thought he was weak and we needed much more with 10 men..
It should work the other way, but for some reason it doesn't. My opinion on it is that he's better against physically and mentally tired defenders and when teams sit in, it's easier to defend against players like Mbuemo and Cunha, as they mainly score from space or outside the box. The opposite is true with Sesko, as the last thing you want when you're sitting in is a big 6ft 5 lad, who can outjump a keeper.I feel like we never look like scoring with Cunha up front and Mbeumo supporting him. Its statistically not true, Mbeumo has scored plenty of his goals like that. However all our attacks look blunt because none of our players are in the box and we just pass the ball around the outside of the box trying to tee up shots, and teams can just defend that area and not worry about defending the box. It looks and feels awful as we make progress down the wing only to look up for a cross and nobody is in there. Sometimes the ball goes in anyway because someone should be in there. And the defenders calmly clear it away under no challenge.
There are ways to make a no striker system work, but it doesnt work for us.
However Sesko coming off the bench and now suddenly we do have a target in the box has obviously caught teams out as they now have to play differently. But shouldnt it work the other way also? If we start with Sesko as a threat in the box that you need to mark, shouldnt finishing the game with Cunha up top and Mbeumo off him in a no striker system also catch teams off guard and get the goals? Or are they just not as good?
It should work the other way, but for some reason it doesn't. My opinion on it is that he's better against physically and mentally tired defenders and when teams sit in, it's easier to defend against players like Mbuemo and Cunha, as they mainly score from space or outside the box. The opposite is true with Sesko, as the last thing you want when you're sitting in is a big 6ft 5 lad, who can outjump a keeper.
Mbuemo is the most productive all round attacker we have this season and Seskos best work has come from the bench. Cunha would probably still be coming from the bench if Dorgu hadn't got injured. We're just a bit of an odd group, every attacker has deserved time on the bench this season, yet have no alternatives.
I don't think any striker should get a pass against someone like Leeds. He should be regularly getting the better of Struijk, Bijol and Justin - at home. His all round game isn't a one off too, it's been on show to be average all season. So if he's not scoring, he's not offering much.Thats why I think its hard to judge Sesko on 2 starts while hes been in form. And he scored in 1 of them...
Mbeumo has been even more limited than Sesko on a bad day since those 2 games against City and Arsenal. He shows no more ability to beat a player and hasnt scored in his last 6 starts and last night's 20 min sub
Well then he should have positioned himself better to get the shot off and be direct.He wasnt clear of the defender, the defender was one on one with him as the final stop before goal.
Well then he should have positioned himself better to get the shot off and be direct.
He lacked confidence and ruthlessness in that situation for someone who is in decent form. People saying he didn't get service- was a brilliant pass to him so show what he could do.
I don't think any striker should get a pass against someone like Leeds. He should be regularly getting the better of Struijk, Bijol and Justin - at home. His all round game isn't a one off too, it's been on show to be average all season. So if he's not scoring, he's not offering much.
For sure Mbuemo has stunk up the place recently, I just think Mbuemo has a bit more credit in the bank and it also seems to bring the best out of Sesko coming from the bench.
I think his all round game was quite good all season, yesterday was just off. His hold up play has been quite good for the most part.I don't think any striker should get a pass against someone like Leeds. He should be regularly getting the better of Struijk, Bijol and Justin - at home. His all round game isn't a one off too, it's been on show to be average all season. So if he's not scoring, he's not offering much.
For sure Mbuemo has stunk up the place recently, I just think Mbuemo has a bit more credit in the bank and it also seems to bring the best out of Sesko coming from the bench.
I think his all round game was quite good all season, yesterday was just off. His hold up play has been quite good for the most part.
He was in form, then we had a month off and everyone lost all sorts of rhythm. It happens. We gotta build ourselves back into it. He didn't play well yesterday but still showed the basics for a CF (get in multiple good chances, get shots off, should've scored).
The biggest regular issue I've seen with Sesko is when he squares a defender up when he has the ball, he gets a decision paralysis. Like he forgot/never learned how to take somebody on 1v1.
Yeah and that moment was more instinctual which he's very good at, while the times he has it at his feet and has time to think, he seems to just go in slow motion.Agree. This has been the area hes looked most raw. He's a bit hesitant and doesnt quite make up his mind early enough and really go for it when taking players on
However he did well with that one time he put it through Bijol's legs and then the goalkeeper saved his initial effort and Leeds cleared the ball off the line. So it was really 50/50 for taking on a defender
I don't really think that's for next season at this point. Right now we're just in the business of getting the best out of the team and right now, that's from the bench.But if we dont start him he cant show that he can do that job too. He will only ever remain a bench goalscorer if thats the case and thats a very unwise thing to do with your most expensive summer signing. So ultimately he needs to start even if he wasnt currently in great goalscoring form
I would say it's average. He has games where it's good and then games where he's clumsy. if you're the focal point, you need be reliable in that aspect and he's not - yet.I think his all round game was quite good all season, yesterday was just off. His hold up play has been quite good for the most part.
He was in form, then we had a month off and everyone lost all sorts of rhythm. It happens. We gotta build ourselves back into it. He didn't play well yesterday but still showed the basics for a CF (get in multiple good chances, get shots off, should've scored).
The biggest regular issue I've seen with Sesko is when he squares a defender up when he has the ball, he gets a decision paralysis. Like he forgot/never learned how to take somebody on 1v1.
Id like Utd to bring in Leowandoski for a year, to help aid Sesko's development. Learn from one of the very best of his generation.
I dont think it's particularly fair to him or to Haaland at their ages to lead the line and not have a senior pro in their position on the pitch helping them with their development.
I meant hojlund. My badHaaland, why you mentioning him. He doesn't need guidance he's a bloody monster.
He doesn't really know what he's doing though. He can't hold it up well enough and he doesn't really know how to press. We didn't really have possession and we're deep, so we didn't really need someone constantly running in behind.Nothing came in close to him. We were always going to have very few chances and our 2 best fell to Cunha instead of him
But I can't help thinking we need a more dynamic and fluid centre forward.
We dont have a striker who holds it up better and I'll take goalscoring over pressing. I want to see goalsHe doesn't really know what he's doing though. He can't hold it up well enough and he doesn't really know how to press. We didn't really have possession and we're deep, so we didn't really need someone constantly running in behind.