tenpoless
No 6-pack, just 2Pac
Converting to mpg is not how football is played, its how you watch it in video formatHe's not a 1 in 2 player. You can convert it to mpG if you like, but that's not how football is played.
Converting to mpg is not how football is played, its how you watch it in video formatHe's not a 1 in 2 player. You can convert it to mpG if you like, but that's not how football is played.
Based on what I saw when its a sequence of movements like receive a pass -> open a room for a shot -> score. Or any kind of combinations that seem instinctive to him, his executions are top quality. But when he has time to think or is off the ball his decision making can still be improved much more.He had a very good game. Took his goal well and his link up play was very good. The one issue I have with him is that he doesnt really press the keepers or defenders, at all. Several times Bruno came sprinting and locked down passing options and Sesk just moved around like a snail.
But this is an easy thing to teach him so I am not worried at all.
Who else did you have a quick glance at to back that up? Strikers on similar amounts of goals like Watkins, Gyokeres, DCL, Mateta are all the same or significantly worse than Sesko.What and quoting mpG isn't simplistic thinking? Sorry, but you can just completely ignore the fact that half the time he passed the ball, we didn't retain possession, but I think that's actually quite important. I hope I'm wrong, but I don't think he has the overall game to lead the line for a club that wants to compete on all fronts. If he ends up being a 1 in 2 striker across the competitions, then the build up game is neither here nor there.
So do I.
I don't think experience particularly matters when it comes to passing, but it's not though having a quick glance. It's the same as Thiagos and Haaland but theyve scored double he has. Genuinely, it was a very well taken goal. That's not the bit I'm worried about and I'll be less worried about it when he puts up numbers like Thiago.
Joao pedro, Welbeck, Ekitike, Watkins, Kroupi are all better in that regard by 5%+ what I saw. Just went t down the top scorer list and you're right on Gyokeres, but his is insanely bad.Who else did you have a quick glance at to back that up? Strikers on similar amounts of goals like Watkins, Gyokeres, DCL, Mateta are all the same or significantly worse than Sesko.
Thiago has scored seven premier league penalties and played double the minutes. To expect him to put up Thiago numbers this season is silly. There was nothing wrong with his build up play tonight, so it’s a very strange game to pick this out.
Watkins is 2% higher, Kroupi 4%. This is probably one of the most irrelevant ways of comparing a striker I can think of. I wouldn’t expect Sesko to be matching the likes of Pedro who has played a lot of minutes at 10 or Welbeck, who plays in a very defined system and is hugely experienced.Joao pedro, Welbeck, Ekitike, Watkins, Kroupi are all better in that regard by 5%+ what I saw. Just went t down the top scorer list and you're right on Gyokeres, but his is insanely bad.
I'm not expecting to put up Thiago numbers, I'm saying improve the overall play OR put up Thiago numbers. The minutes point is also down to Sesko, he was not trusted in our best performances this season. Hopefully that changes next season. We have a different opinion on that aspect of the game then. I have absolutely zero problem with him in front of goal, it's the pressing and overall play I think is lacking.
Also, Welbeck has had 15 seasons in the Prem and this is the only one of those seasons where he’s scored more than Sesko has in his debut seasonWatkins is 2% higher, Kroupi 4%. This is probably one of the most irrelevant ways of comparing a striker I can think of. I wouldn’t expect Sesko to be matching the likes of Pedro who has played a lot of minutes at 10 or Welbeck, who plays in a very defined system and is hugely experienced.
So you’d be fine with his overall play if he had scored seven penalties this season? Thiago looked absolutely woeful compared to Sesko last night. Also don’t forget that Mbeumo was a 20 goal a season striker at that club. He’s on half that at United this season.
The minutes thing this season was partly Sesko settling into the league, partly Amorim’s system being absolutely awful. It’s fine to have concerns, there were times this season when Sesko looked really short of confidence with the ball at his feet, but last night wasn’t that at all.
That's not what's on fot mob, per 90. Pedro has been their no 9. Either way, if they've got more or the same goals, you go into other aspects of play. It's not a high benchmark, I'm not asking him to be Harry Kane.Watkins is 2% higher, Kroupi 4%. This is probably one of the most irrelevant ways of comparing a striker I can think of. I wouldn’t expect Sesko to be matching the likes of Pedro who has played a lot of minutes at 10 or Welbeck, who plays in a very defined system and is hugely experienced.
So you’d be fine with his overall play if he had scored seven penalties this season? Thiago looked absolutely woeful compared to Sesko last night. Also don’t forget that Mbeumo was a 20 goal a season striker at that club. He’s on half that at United this season.
The minutes thing this season was partly Sesko settling into the league, partly Amorim’s system being absolutely awful. It’s fine to have concerns, there were times this season when Sesko looked really short of confidence with the ball at his feet, but last night wasn’t that at all.
This is a team/personnel problem though. If that's how we want to play, we need to invest in wingers, midfielders and FBs who can cross and set up the team as such. Hopefully we'll see that in the summer along with a partner for Mainoo and the squad will have more balance.It's pretty funny how this thread swings from "He's useless" to "This kid is special" from game to game. Of course I understand the reasons - he's a young kid in a new league and a team that isn't exactly a purring attacking machine, so there is some inconsistency there. I guess this lack of nuance is a hallmark of internet discourse.
Overall I just wish the team could provide him with more chances, especially by putting in some crosses. We've not nearly made enough use of his heading ability.
I don't think he's useless or special. He's been quite good overall and I think he has potential to be a very good PL forward who averages 15-20 per season in a top 4 team. Considering the lack of elite level strikers in football these days, and the ridiculous fees they all go for, I think we can be generally pleased with the transferIt's pretty funny how this thread swings from "He's useless" to "This kid is special" from game to game. Of course I understand the reasons - he's a young kid in a new league and a team that isn't exactly a purring attacking machine, so there is some inconsistency there. I guess this lack of nuance is a hallmark of internet discourse.
Overall I just wish the team could provide him with more chances, especially by putting in some crosses. We've not nearly made enough use of his heading ability.
Exactly at set pieces we have three genuine threats which is why teams are so scared to give away free kicks and corners, it’s not just Casemiro and Harry, Sesko is talking then both of them?It's pretty funny how this thread swings from "He's useless" to "This kid is special" from game to game. Of course I understand the reasons - he's a young kid in a new league and a team that isn't exactly a purring attacking machine, so there is some inconsistency there. I guess this lack of nuance is a hallmark of internet discourse.
Overall I just wish the team could provide him with more chances, especially by putting in some crosses. We've not nearly made enough use of his heading ability.
Of course. It's everything from the quality of our wingers, the quality of our fullbacks, and the ability of the team so sustain possession and create overlapping situations to put in good crosses. The team needs to improve in just about every way next season.This is a team/personnel problem though. If that's how we want to play, we need to invest in wingers, midfielders and FBs who can cross and set up the team as such. Hopefully we'll see that in the summer along with a partner for Mainoo and the squad will have more balance.
Sadly, I think Bruno is the only one in the squad capable of consistently putting a good cross in. Dorgu started to do it before he was injured. I think that needs to be a paramount factor when it comes to signing a LB - Diouf might actually be a good option in that regard.Of course. It's everything from the quality of our wingers, the quality of our fullbacks, and the ability of the team so sustain possession and create overlapping situations to put in good crosses. The team needs to improve in just about every way next season.
Still, I think the team could have tried to find him more with crosses, even with our current limitations. That headed goal he scored from Bruno's cross is a good example.
I noticed that amad type play a lot in general yesterday. Our players have a habit of not only being within 5 yards of each other but actively getting in each others way.I thought his hold up play was decent. I was fuming when he beat two defenders with a nutmeg and Amad came charging over and kicked the ball straight to an opposition player.
He held the ball up well when played into himI thought his hold up play was decent. I was fuming when he beat two defenders with a nutmeg and Amad came charging over and kicked the ball straight to an opposition player.
It's been a thing for a long time. Happened pretty much every match when Højlund was playing. But Carrick also mentioned during his post match interview that the classic number 9 isn't as common as it used to be. Different profiles are used by a lot of teams.What really annoys me is the balls being pinged into Amad at the back post, possibly the smallest player on the pitch, yet when Sesko is free a ball is never incoming!
I’m sorry but some of that post is illogical. Pass completion is 69% vs 72% on FootMob for Sesko and Watkins, it’s splitting hairs for a striker. You could also go into other parts of their play such as aerial duels won where Sesko is 15% higher than Watkins. Which isn’t surprising because players will have different strengths and weaknesses.That's not what's on fot mob, per 90. Pedro has been their no 9. Either way, if they've got more or the same goals, you go into other aspects of play. It's not a high benchmark, I'm not asking him to be Harry Kane.
I'm talking about numbers, he needs to be our undisputed source of goals if his build up doesn't improve, in my opinion. I don't really care how Thiago or Mbuemo got them.
Yeah, which is fine. I was more concerned with the quality on the ball and how he pressed, something I already have concerns about.
This is a team/personnel problem though. If that's how we want to play, we need to invest in wingers, midfielders and FBs who can cross and set up the team as such. Hopefully we'll see that in the summer along with a partner for Mainoo and the squad will have more balance.
Agreed, the lack of service throughout the game makes him look bad, almost nothing is created and he is so isolated from the forwards that he can't do much with them not trying to connect with him more often either by early balls or one-twos and so on.I think hes also slightly unlucky that Bruno and the rest of our teammates werent looking for early balls in behind the defence for him. There were plenty of times where we were breaking and he was moving faster than the CBs and the right ball in behind has him 1 on 1 with the goalkeeper. Yes our 2nd goal was the product of Bruno delaying and picking a correct pass in the end but there were other times where he might have added to his goal if we released him earlier.
But I'm discussing his overall play, so that's why I was looking at that particular stat. He also gets dispossesed less, wins more fouls, etc. I'm not arguing against Sesko's aerial ability, that's never been in question.I’m sorry but some of that post is illogical. Pass completion is 69% vs 72% on FootMob for Sesko and Watkins, it’s splitting hairs for a striker. You could also go into other parts of their play such as aerial duels won where Sesko is 15% higher than Watkins. Which isn’t surprising because players will have different strengths and weaknesses.
You can’t just expect a striker with the height and speed of Sesko to also have the passing ability of a Joao Pedro - who incidentally has started at 10 for 11 of his last 50 starts. He’s clearly a different type of player.
To say you don’t care that Thiago has scored seven penalty goals is weird, you can’t be discussing stats and then suddenly ignore something like that because it doesn’t suit your argument.
Sesko actually ranked highly for his defensive work at Leipzig, which is unsurprising in their system. Our press has always been poor and un-coordinated https://football-observatory.com/WeeklyPost463
If he can continually replicate the kind of hold up play we saw last night and score at a similar rate next season, he’s going to be our first choice striker long term.
There’s definitely a case of cherry picking what stats you’re looking at. Why would winning an aerial duel be less important than something like winning fouls. Watkins goes down embarrassingly easy, but that’s definitely an experience thing. Sesko can improve on that if that’s something you’re really looking for from a striker.But I'm discussing his overall play, so that's why I was looking at that particular stat. He also gets dispossesed less, wins more fouls, etc. I'm not arguing against Sesko's aerial ability, that's never been in question.
I'm not, it's about effectiveness. If you can't pass and play like Joao pedro, you should score more.
I don't care in the sense that if Sesko was our penalty taker, I wouldn't discount them either. He didn't even take one against Grimsby. We've had 4 pens this season, if he had taken and scored all 4, I'd be happier too. My argument is purely output.
That's fine, but we're not going to play or press like Leipzig. That was peak Red Bull, he has to be a bit smarter in how he presses.
If he scores at the same mpG rate whilst starting, this will all be moot from me and will happily scoff that humble pie down.
I mean, you're doing the exact same thing. You're just weighting aerial duels higher, when I'm obviously talking about him holding up the ball and bringing people into play. I'm generally looking him to improve his all round play so he can be a focal point, so yeah, if he does - great.There’s definitely a case of cherry picking what stats you’re looking at. Why would winning an aerial duel be less important than something like winning fouls. Watkins goes down embarrassingly easy, but that’s definitely an experience thing. Sesko can improve on that if that’s something you’re really looking for from a striker.
Again, I don’t get the Pedro comparison. Completely different players, we’ve already covered this. Sesko has some strengths over Pedro and the goal output is similar, despite less minutes. Not to mention they’ve all got years on Sesko both in terms of age and exposure to English football.
His penalty record is 11 scored and 0 missed in his career, so I don’t find this relevant at all. Just purely looking at it from total goals is a very school way of looking at stats. If that makes you happier then so be it.
And for the record, he did score a penalty against Grimsby. I can’t see us fundamentally agreeing on much here
. I don't know why you wouldn't want to look at a striker from their total goals record. His underlying stats are good, but that does still just boil down to 10 goals, I think going into the season that was going to be the bare minimum.
I’m definitely not interested in comparing stats that way, I’m just showing you that strikers have different qualities to consider. Do you actually realise what difference it would make if Sesko increased his pass completion from 69% to Pedro’s 77%? It’s 19 made passes over the space of 29 games. Not even one extra made pass per game.I mean, you're doing the exact same thing. You're just weighting aerial duels higher, when I'm obviously talking about him holding up the ball and bringing people into play. I'm generally looking him to improve his all round play so he can be a focal point, so yeah, if he does - great.
It's not a direct comparison, it's saying that if you have a choice of striker and you pick someone like Sesko over Pedro, they need to be as effective. Again, if Sesko was sitting on 14 goals and 5 assists, this is the output I'm expecting of my striker. You're trying to make a stylistic comparison, which I've never tried to do it. They are a different type of striker that has more to their game and have a better output.
I'm not saying he's a bad penalty taker. I don't know why you wouldn't want to look at a striker from their total goals record. His underlying stats are good, but that does still just boil down to 10 goals, I think going into the season that was going to be the bare minimum.
My bad, misremembered that, he was no 10 in the list. Probably not. For the record, I hope you're right.