sullydnl
Ross Kemp's caf ID
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2012
- Messages
- 36,278
A key piece of context for this transfer is that we know who the "guaranteed goals", "PL proven", "easily has 3+ years left in him", "manager's preferred choice" alternative would have been.
Ollie Watkins. Currently on zero goals for the season, having played over two full 90's more than Sesko. And getting these sort of reviews from Villa fans:
It's easy to say "we needed a striker who can come in and score goals straight away". But as we saw in the summer, a lot of teams were looking for and struggling to find the same.
Add in players who reportedly rejected us for other teams (Gyokeres, Ekitike, Delap) or we were never going to get (Isak), and your options come down to that Sesko/Watkins level. It's not like we didn't try for alternatives, but you can't make players come here.
Maybe Watkins will come good this season and maybe Sesko will be a long term flop. But right now, I don't feel particularly uncomfortable with the choice we made in backing the younger long term option. Because none of these players guarantee goals.
And if that means Sesko sitting on the bench sometimes in favour of a Cunha/Mbeumo/Mount front three, that's fine. I'll judge that call on how well the chosen front three play.
Ollie Watkins. Currently on zero goals for the season, having played over two full 90's more than Sesko. And getting these sort of reviews from Villa fans:
if he's not missing sitters from 4 yards out, he can't even take a decent penalty. Hasn't offered us anything at all for months. Can we find anyone daft enough to give us a good fee for him in January? Just useless. Can't score, can't pass and can't even get on the ball anymore.
When out of form and low in confidence he not only contributes nothing but is actively the oppos best player because any chances that come his way are missed.
His Villa career is going to end like Gabby's.
He has done well to get to this level as a striker because that isn’t his natural position and he isn’t a natural goalscorer.
He is a problem
Just don't rate him. At all.
I'd say it's his last season with us. He'll either want to go anyway, or we will sell him. A better more aggressive striker, playing that high line will win us trophies, I have no doubt.
He is lucky we have no alternative. A Duran or Rashford type and he would be no where near the team at the moment.
This is just Watkins. When he's being spoon fed chances he'll score goals, but we can't rely on a striker scoring chances that anyone will score. We need him to at least add something.
I don't think Malen was particularly outstanding yesterday, but the flow of the game was night and day when he went off and Watkins came on.
Just a technically poor player. His actual ball striking is just random number generator.
It's easy to say "we needed a striker who can come in and score goals straight away". But as we saw in the summer, a lot of teams were looking for and struggling to find the same.
Add in players who reportedly rejected us for other teams (Gyokeres, Ekitike, Delap) or we were never going to get (Isak), and your options come down to that Sesko/Watkins level. It's not like we didn't try for alternatives, but you can't make players come here.
Maybe Watkins will come good this season and maybe Sesko will be a long term flop. But right now, I don't feel particularly uncomfortable with the choice we made in backing the younger long term option. Because none of these players guarantee goals.
And if that means Sesko sitting on the bench sometimes in favour of a Cunha/Mbeumo/Mount front three, that's fine. I'll judge that call on how well the chosen front three play.
