Swedish_Plumber
Full Member
Can’t see us finding a buyer for Rasmus
The italian serie a way.Only way how and why this can happen is in the fact that (according to rumours) his agent is offering him around. If he is doing that with club's blessing then fee can be negotiated in our favor.
Lets say for 60-70 mil in 40 installments
Signing an unproven striker from the Bundesliga for £80m. What could go wrong?
People are soiling themselves over Liverpool trying to do just thatSigning an unproven striker from the Bundesliga for £80m. What could go wrong?

I agree with this. But I also feel the same way about Ekitike, who scored 2 more goals and had 3 more assists and is being lauded as prime Thierry Henry.OK I'll put it another way. In our position spending a mega fee (70m+) on a striker who finished a full BL season on 13 goals would be insanity. People here love hype though
People are soiling themselves over Liverpool trying to do just that![]()
Do we even have the funds for this after Cunha and Mbuemo?
Offer Hojlund + cash and see what they say
What profile do you think we need?Sesko is the wrong profile of striker for us.
Reassuring.Its not like we have signed another unproven striker for almost the same amount before.
A more proven goalscorerWhat profile do you think we need?
Someone that scores actual goals at a good rate. Right now Sesko is closer to being the next Moratta.What profile do you think we need?
This, exactly this, however, depending on what the net income and wage differential comes out of it.Would rather Watkins on a swap with Garnacho, and use any funds we can raise for a midfielder and goalkeeper personally.
What profile do you think we need?
I think we need a striker in the Gyökeres/Osimhen/Watkins mould. Someone who runs in behind and attacks the box. A player who generates (and delivers in line with) a high xG due to their movement, offensive positioning and finishing ability. A box crashing, high intensity/ high volume runner and finisher.What profile do you think we need?
Agree 110% Watkins would suit so much better. He runs the channels so well and that is needed with 2 number 10s behind the striker.Would rather Watkins on a swap with Garnacho, and use any funds we can raise for a midfielder and goalkeeper personally.
The goals will flow if they raise the level in midfield. The likes of Bruno, Mbuemo, Amad and Cunha will score goals in advanced positions. The goal threat is high in attack imo but if your attack is constantly undermined by the midfield who are unable to vertically pass the ball forward and also help with containing the counter in a higher line, then it will be problematic again over the course of the season.A more proven goalscorer
Hojlund!I think we need a striker in the Gyökeres/Osimhen/Watkins mould. Someone who runs in behind and attacks the box. A player who generates (and delivers in line with) a high xG due to their movement, offensive positioning and finishing ability. A box crashing, high intensity/ high volume runner and finisher.
Højlund in his first season here, at least looked like the right profile of striker. Ideally, we just need a move experienced and refined version. What we saw from him last season, I cannot describe what sort of profile he was.Hojlund!
Glad to have that confirmed before I got carried away!There’s no chance of us signing him or any other expensive striker this transfer window. It’s going to be a late loan deal/free agent or we’ll just go with what we have.
Im actually in agreement with all of this. I just thing the price as you say is too high. For that kind of money I want better goalscoring pedigree.The goals will flow if they raise the level in midfield. The likes of Bruno, Mbuemo, Amad and Cunha will score goals in advanced positions. The goal threat is high in attack imo but if your attack is constantly undermined by the midfield who are unable to vertically pass the ball forward and also help with containing the counter in a higher line, then it will be problematic again over the course of the season.
I think ideally I would've liked a striker who is aerially dominant. Someone like Osimhem would've been good in that regard but his wage demands are said to be a stumbling block.
I think with Sesko the asking price is too high if reports are to be believed. But he's a young striker who does have the attributes to potentially be elite unlike alot of the other players we're linked with imo. But for me the midfield is the most important area to strengthen. I'm yet to see United consistently dominate teams in a higher defensive line backing the high press. We're unable to execute the strategy because our first two lines have been weak. The first line has improved but the midfield needs players who not only can retain possession at a high level but also have the ability to vertically thread the lines whilst also controlling space in a higher line. Liverpool did that with Wijnaldum and Henderson.
The price does seem excessive, especially for a team like ours who would probably be better off going for a marquee midfield signing and a central striker who fits into the value money signing category. Of course that all depends on how much the overall budget will be.Im actually in agreement with all of this. I just thing the price as you say is too high. For that kind of money I want better goalscoring pedigree.
If he has that he hides it very well...Sesko has word class potential. Better than Gyökeres and Ekitike.
Sesko has word class potential. Better than Gyökeres and Ekitike.