Murder on Zidane's Floor
You'd better not kill Giroud
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2015
- Messages
- 28,599
Rather have an issue with having too many strikers in the squad than not enough.
He only started after a lot of injuries, he's struggled overall.Has he been any good? Don't think he even starts for (a fairly weak) Leipzig team right?
All I've heard about re: Leipzig was that Xavi Simmons has apparently been good.
In what way is Sesko more the profile than Hojlund? They are roughly the same height with Sesko only cm taller, Hojlund is way quicker, also had a way better goals to games ratio when they both played in the same league, infact he helped Sturm Graz smash Salzburg when they were both on the pitch against each other. They have the same amount of goals each season too. Sesko is nothing like Antony Martial and is actually more like Hojlund in terms of profile. The fact that you think Hojlund only came to prominece because he's scandinavian and shares a similar name to Haaland is crazy.More the profile we need than Hojlund, who I maintain was targeted largely due to the success of Haaland. Often happens when a striker excels then that becomes the profile to look for. The thing is, even Haaland himself would not been targeted by City had he not been an exception in terms of scoring. Haaland is tolerated by Guardiola as opposed to him being his ideal template I believe. Similarly with Kyle Walker. The purist in Pep would much rather Cancelo than Walker, but Walker is effectively a cheat code and so Pep lives with him.
Sesko is more a United striker than Hojlund for me, certainly in terms of profile. The most ideal striker we could get is the very best version of Anthony Martial. A 6ft player with speed, hold up play, finishing ability but also supreme technique who can conjur individual magic and dribble and also link with his fellow forwards at the highest level. Sesko is more that sort of player I feel, although it is of course to be determined what level he will end up at.
Neither have proven to be very good right now.In what way is Sesko more the profile than Hojlund? They are roughly the same height with Sesko only cm taller, Hojlund is way quicker, also had a way better goals to games ratio when they both played in the same league, infact he helped Sturm Graz smash Salzburg when they were both on the pitch against each other. They have the same amount of goals each season too. Sesko is nothing like Antony Martial and is actually more like Hojlund in terms of profile. The fact that you think Hojlund only came to prominece because he's scandinavian and shares a similar name to Haaland is crazy.
Your post didn’t really need to be any longer than the very first line, unless of course you preferred to answer the question yourself.In what way is Sesko more the profile than Hojlund? They are roughly the same height with Sesko only cm taller, Hojlund is way quicker, also had a way better goals to games ratio when they both played in the same league, infact he helped Sturm Graz smash Salzburg when they were both on the pitch against each other. They have the same amount of goals each season too. Sesko is nothing like Antony Martial and is actually more like Hojlund in terms of profile. The fact that you think Hojlund only came to prominece because he's scandinavian and shares a similar name to Haaland is crazy.
Is Sesko really that much better as a playmaker that you think he would find the same time, space and usage on the ball he is now/has before compared to what Hojlund has had so far in the Premier League i.e extremely minimal? I'm genuinely asking because I've not seem much of him outside of some highlights.Your post didn’t really need to be any longer than the very first line, unless of course you preferred to answer the question yourself.
Sesko is technically better to me and better at dropping deep and linking. Hojlund is a shoulder player who requires ‘service’. I don’t see him as having the ability to join in and play to a good enough standard in deeper areas.
As for the Haaland comparison, it is again a case of a striker who is not like the striker I mentioned in the paragraph above (or in my actual initial post). Prior to Haaland’s emergence, the consensus on here was that the striker needed to be more of an all-rounder.
Also, please miss me with the stat overload. I made it clear in my initial post that I was referring to profile and said that it remains unclear as to what level he will reach.
He seems to have quick feet and more talent with the ball at feet like Isak of Newcastle. Not seen enough of the rest to say he would have been better for us.In what way is Sesko more the profile than Hojlund? They are roughly the same height with Sesko only cm taller, Hojlund is way quicker, also had a way better goals to games ratio when they both played in the same league, infact he helped Sturm Graz smash Salzburg when they were both on the pitch against each other. They have the same amount of goals each season too. Sesko is nothing like Antony Martial and is actually more like Hojlund in terms of profile. The fact that you think Hojlund only came to prominece because he's scandinavian and shares a similar name to Haaland is crazy.
He's definitely more comfortable on the ball than hojlund.In what way is Sesko more the profile than Hojlund? They are roughly the same height with Sesko only cm taller, Hojlund is way quicker, also had a way better goals to games ratio when they both played in the same league, infact he helped Sturm Graz smash Salzburg when they were both on the pitch against each other. They have the same amount of goals each season too. Sesko is nothing like Antony Martial and is actually more like Hojlund in terms of profile. The fact that you think Hojlund only came to prominece because he's scandinavian and shares a similar name to Haaland is crazy.