Best way to play with 10 men?

MattofManchester

Full Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2018
Messages
3,748
If you're Ole, these are the steps:

  1. You concede that your team can't score or even attack despite how good your forwards are or how shite the opposition is
  2. You throw as many defenders as possible because the only way of winning is not conceding and the only way of not conceding is more and more defenders
  3. You show that you're not some PE teacher who's afraid to sub off the GOAT. Even though you could've done that when you were leading rather than when you need a goal. Sub out the other Portuguese guy as well because why the feck not?!
  4. You have an option of throwing the kid who can carry the ball and has 3 goals in 4 games. Or there's this French guy who was Mbappe's replacement for France. But you remind yourself that you don't care about nonsense like stats or common sense, you want the smile on a young lad's face. On comes Jesse to bring the glory.
  5. Since there are no more defenders left, throw on the next best thing so you can have 5 defenders, 2 defensive midfielders, 1 central midfielder and 1 Jesse
  6. Just when you the time is getting over, you ask yourself, can I make one final change to be known as the greatest tactician ever. You point to the any random sub, throw him on for any random outfielder.
  7. You have already made miracles happen in the CL. Will it be a night like Paris where your tactical brilliance of throwing a couple of reserves and a third choice RB win you the game? Oh no, luck has swung the other way.
  8. It's okay. You tell yourself that you fought for a hard earned point against a very tough contender. All that matters now is that you bring out a motivational quote for your next press conference.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
42,727
Liverpool are immeasurably better then Young Boys, yet after the pen Chelsea conceded no goals, while we conceded 2 to a team who would struggle to stay in the Championship.
Sure they defended better. Even with 11 men they are a better possession team than us, so it's easier to reorganize even after a red card, but did they ever look like snatching the win? I think they just gave up attacking. People talk about formation and all, but Tuchel is even more defensive than Ole, he's just better at it.
 

Schmeichel's Cartwheel

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Dec 21, 2014
Messages
11,420
Location
Manchester
Sure they defended better. Even with 11 men they are a better possession team than us, so it's easier to reorganize even after a red card, but did they ever look like snatching the win? I think they just gave up attacking. People talk about formation and all, but Tuchel is even more defensive than Ole, he's just better at it.
Would Chelsea have reacted that way against Young Boys, as opposed to Liverpool though?

Not exactly the same are they?
 

youmeletsfly

New Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2018
Messages
2,528
Think it's more about the opposition and how they play. You need to identify where they don't apply enough pressure and use that position to play like you're with 11.
It also important to have two high energy midfielders though.
 

moses

Can't We Just Be Nice?
Staff
Joined
Jul 28, 2006
Messages
42,765
Location
I have no idea either, yet.
If you don't have to score then just take off a striker. At the level we're supposed to be at you should be able to shut anyone out (and especially Young Boys) for an hour. As has been mentioned, Chelsea did this against a much better class of opposition and the key was the midfield. We looked like a poor Ireland side last night after the sending off, with no real connection between the front and back. But that is who we are, even when we beat a team convincingly, we are just better at attacking, showing no real control or game management. Going to a back 5 before the 90th minute is unforgivable. Also, Sancho was the last of the attackers that should have been taken off IMO. I thought Ole got almost every decision wrong last night.
 

Acheron

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2016
Messages
2,843
Supports
Real Madrid
I think the best would be to take out one of the forwards and try to keep the same formation. Of course it also depends on the score and how many minutes are left to play. So if there are about like 60 minutes left to play I don't think it would be wise to park bus and give up the attack and midfield.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,348
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Accept the fact that the odds are against you with 10 men and even if you do a lot right you will likely walk away with a loss against a competent team.
Depends how you define “likely” and “competent”. As @moses said, a team as (allegedly) good as us should be able to shut a team like Young Boys out for 60 minutes far more often than not, even when a man down.

Obviously stopping them scoring involves not allowing them 71% possession for that hour. That was just asking for trouble.
 

moses

Can't We Just Be Nice?
Staff
Joined
Jul 28, 2006
Messages
42,765
Location
I have no idea either, yet.
Jose's Inter held Barca at bay for longer with 10 men I think. 2010, Motta sent off early, conceded only 1, won 3-2 on aggregate. Again the key was the midfield, shielding the defence, and holding possession long enough for people to breathe and regroup, and posing a long ball threat down the channels to occupy the defence. Greenwood or Sancho on the shoulder of the last defender would have given them something to think about, especially if we had a deep sitting midfielder with any passing range.
 

moses

Can't We Just Be Nice?
Staff
Joined
Jul 28, 2006
Messages
42,765
Location
I have no idea either, yet.
Accept the fact that the odds are against you with 10 men and even if you do a lot right you will likely walk away with a loss against a competent team.
Nah, it's been done by too many to dismiss it. My favourite was in euro 2000(?) when Italy lost Iuliano early on and drew 0-0 with Holland after extra time, then beat them on penos. That was their only way to win after the sending off and they relished it. (I won money on the result, doubled the bet when they went a man down).

So while it's not a guarantee, the teams that have done it have the personnel and coaching to do it. With the gulf in class last night, the right set up and personnel would see you through more often than not IMO.
 

andersj

Nick Powell Expert
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Messages
4,274
Location
Copenhagen
Just wondering (no particular reason!) what is the best way to set up after having a man sent off?

Obviously a lot will depend on how you start the game and the score when someone is sent off. So let’s assume (again, no particular reason!) you start with four at the back, generally dominate possession and are a goal up.

In my opinion, if you go into the game thinking your back four can keep the opposition out then have the courage of your convictions. Leave the back four as a back four.

I also think you don’t feck with minefield. Keep the shape and numbers exactly the same. If it’s good enough to win midfield when you have XI then it becomes even more important to keep a grip on midfield when you’re a man down.

So my conclusion is that the immediate response to getting a player sent off is to tweak things so that the only area you’re a man short is in the attacking third.

Other opinions are available, obviously. Especially if you have examples of other teams/managers successfully taking a different approach.

Go!
No idea, but feels like we know the worst today.
 

Powderfinger

Full Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2015
Messages
2,196
Supports
Arsenal
As many others have said, you take off an attacker and play largely the same formation/tactics in defense and midfield that you're used to playing and, presumably, good at playing.

You obviously don't press high anymore because you don't have the numbers. You sub the attackers eventually because they're going to have to do a ton of work without the ball chasing shadows and because they need to have the energy once you do get the ball to move to become your outlet and the strength/ability to hold it up a little bit and let others come into play.

To the extent you look to score, its going to be off a very quick counter if they're throwing everybody forward or you look to win a few set pieces in the attacking third and give it a real go off those.
 

honirelandboy

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 24, 2021
Messages
353
4-4-1 is the clear outlet.

I would of going for a midfield of Sancho- Fred-VDB-Greenwood with Bruno as a false nine.

You need that wing space when down to 10 men.

Ronaldo and Pogba would of been replaced by Dalot and Greenwood.
 

ti vu

Full Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
12,799
You, as the team with 10 men, have to have something you're good at (identity), then work from there taking opposition's quality, the scoreline, the revised best outcome into account.

Managers may change the formation, team shape, when they're a man down; but most of them had prepare the team for the situation, and retain fundamental function of the team. To have a team totally play like stranger in their first day with others is reflecting badly on the manager's preparation work.
 
Last edited:

Jericho

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
1,109
Agreed with anyone saying 4-4-1. The natural inclination is to put on more defenders and go 3 CBs with wingbacks or something, but you end up inviting more pressure and making it much more difficult to get out of your own final third.
 

Stevondo8

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2019
Messages
1,103
Speaking entirely from a football manager perspective, I’d always go 4-4-1. Last night I’d have been tempted to sacrifice one of Bruno or Pogba initially (just because Sancho is more used to the winger role). Then 2nd half it’s all about legs and workrate really.
 

RedRonaldo

Wishes to be oppressed.
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
18,996
De Gea
Dalot Varane Maguire Shaw
Fred Matic
Bruno Pogba
Ronaldo​
 

Chipper

Adulterer.
Joined
Oct 25, 2017
Messages
5,466
Best? Probably not, but I'd be tempted to try a sort of 4-2-3-0/4-3-2/4-5-0 these days.

Strikerless, wide men/wing forwards the furthest players forward. They'd need to be mobile, hard working and have good stamina as they need to support the midfield when out of possession too.

Plenty of bodies still in midfield so you can attempt to play a keep ball.

On the counter you can try to hit the wide players who can isolate against a full back rather than a central striker being up against what will likely be 2 central defenders. Hopefully that's easier for them to find space.

Would be dropping off a lot of the time when their central defenders have the ball. Could come undone if one of them is particularly gifted at passing or even dribbling.

Don't really think we had the right players on the pitch to make that work well yesterday if that's what it's about.


---------------------GK------------------
-----RB------CB------CB-----LB----
----DM/CM--CM/AM--DM/CM-
-RWF---------------------------LWF-
 
Last edited:

caid

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2014
Messages
8,266
Location
Dublin
It’s interesting to me that so many people are focussing on the Lingard, Fred, Martial substitutions (which I agree were all debatable) but there’s not been much discussion about switching to five at the back. That was what really killed us IMO. Basically turned the game into attack vs defence. Which will almost always fail if you need to keep a clean sheet for an hour.
I thought it was a mistake. I just dont think Dalot is trusted as a full back. he's probably played as a winger as often for Solskjaer as in a back 4.
I get bringing Varane on, that made total sense but it should have been for Lindelof. Maguire and Lindelof were pretty comfortable even after going down to 10, bringing on Varane was enough to keep us covered back there. If he wanted to protect Dalot then throw Lingard on the wing ahead of him to track back or stick Fred on his side, he can't be so bad that he needs an extra cb to do all the defending for him. Bailly, Matic and Telles were on the bench and with a bit of shuffling you could get an extra cb if they bring on an extra attacker.
A lot of their attacks were starting wide, i'd want my wide players to drop back and support the full back and midfield.
I'd leave one player forward to try and keep their defenders honest, making runs out to the channels would be nice. They need to be able to offer some threat on their own really, no ones is going to worry too much about lingard.
441 last night basically. The 423 was mostly fine too.
 

2 man midfield

Last Man Standing finalist 2021/22
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
45,667
Location
?
It’s interesting to me that so many people are focussing on the Lingard, Fred, Martial substitutions (which I agree were all debatable) but there’s not been much discussion about switching to five at the back. That was what really killed us IMO. Basically turned the game into attack vs defence. Which will almost always fail if you need to keep a clean sheet for an hour.
Exactly, the best form of defence against teams like this is attack. There was a thread on here over the weekend about fear factor. Well the precise thing you do not want to do, is surrender all attacking threat and sub off all your forwards including the best one ever. We could’ve won that even with 10, but we invited them onto us and you could see their bollocks growing by the minute. We needed to be strong and we blew it.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,121
I'd have taken off Bruno because he's wasteful on the ball and its a bad idea with 10 men.

Dalot-Maguire-Varane-Shaw
Fred-Matic-VDB
Greenwood-Ronaldo

3 at the back doesn't work because you need able wingbacks to ensure the team isn't penned back too much. If one resorts to hoof ball it fecks it all up. We played 3 at the back, so it meant our midfield had zero control. Lingard was struggling to hold the ball in deep areas and Dalot kept punting it back to them. It was all a mess.
 

Chipper

Adulterer.
Joined
Oct 25, 2017
Messages
5,466
Chelsea were battered. Fortunately they didn't have a lingard.
They really weren't.

The penalty following the red card put Liverpool's xG up to 1.45 after 49 minutes. They ended up on 2.08, with Chelseas keeping them down to 0.63 for the remaining 41 minutes plus injury time. At half time Liverpool's xG was 0.69 so if you take the penalty out of it there was no discernable difference to Liverpool's goalscoring threat in the second half.

The 1.32 overall xG that Liverpool created in open play throughout the game is just not a battering. It's less than they created against all of their other 3 opponents in the league so far.
 
Last edited:

TheMagicFoolBus

Full Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
6,502
Location
Lisboa, Portugal
Supports
Chelsea
Sure they defended better. Even with 11 men they are a better possession team than us, so it's easier to reorganize even after a red card, but did they ever look like snatching the win? I think they just gave up attacking. People talk about formation and all, but Tuchel is even more defensive than Ole, he's just better at it.
We had the best chance of the second half mate.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
42,727
They really weren't.

The penalty following the red card put Liverpool's xG up to 1.45 after 49 minutes. They ended up on 2.08, with Chelseas keeping them down to 0.63 for the remaining 41 minutes plus injury time. At half time Liverpool's xG was 0.69 so if you take the penalty out of it there was no discernable difference to Liverpool's goalscoring threat in the second half.

The 1.32 overall xG that Liverpool created in open play throughout the game is just not a battering. It's less than they created against all of their other 3 opponents in the league so far.
http://www.soccer-blogger.com/2021/...h-stats-expected-goals-shots-map-lfc-1-1-cfc/

66% - 34% possession, 24 shots to 6, 12 corners, 4 big chances and twice as many passes.
 

Chipper

Adulterer.
Joined
Oct 25, 2017
Messages
5,466
http://www.soccer-blogger.com/2021/...h-stats-expected-goals-shots-map-lfc-1-1-cfc/

66% - 34% possession, 24 shots to 6, 12 corners, 4 big chances and twice as many passes.
Perhaps that bloke's xG model is superior to both Understat's and Michael Caley's but that seems really off to me. Fbref put it halfway in between.

I think that guy might have counted the chance(s) that led to the penalty as well as the penalty itself in the total whereas the others didn't? Hard to tell but would explain it, looks like there's a big dot from where Matip headed it and also from around the area where James conceded the penalty from Mane's effort.

2 or even 3 of the attempts leading up to the penalty plus the penalty itself may be 3 of the 4 big chances.

Does he do a timeline on there that I'm not seeing? I don't remember Liverpool having many big chances after Chelsea were down to 10.

Possession, , corners etc. don't really mean much if you're not creating much from then and shot count doesn't if they're not good chances.

Here's Understat's timeline for what its worth.
 
Last edited:

DON’T PANIC ™

Full Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2011
Messages
1,161
Location
Ireland
As much as I agree that Ole got all the second half subs wrong, on paper, this shouldn’t have mattered too much given the supposed gulf in class between Utd and YB.
However the second half defensive and hoof ball tactics employed made the formation irrelevant. There were no calm heads or any attempt to keep the ball from the opposition to stifle their attacks. Instead Utd got deeper and deeper and tried to rely on having a “world class” defensive pairing + Lindelof to keep a clean sheet.

The earlier poster who presented how Bayern would have responded got it spot on. Against a lower level team, even with 10 men, Utd should have been playing to get a second goal instead of hanging on and parking the bus.

The withdrawal of Sancho for Dalot made sense at the time, it was the half time decision to go ultra defensive that killed us.
 

FootballHQ

Full Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
18,139
Supports
Aston Villa
It's not easy.

Easily Chelsea's worst performance under Tuchel was that game v West Brom. 1 up and think it was Silva who was sent off and they conceded five in the end. Always worse to lose a CB I think as pretty much always means you have to put on a sub unless one of the midfielders can slot into the backline. Can be o.k if you lose a wide play as you just narrow the midfield then.

Worst though has to be the rare occasions a keeper gets sent off as you automatically have to make a sub and pretty much means an attacker has to go off so a double whammy in one go.
 

ReddBalls

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2015
Messages
992
Liverpool are immeasurably better then Young Boys, yet after the pen Chelsea conceded no goals, while we conceded 2 to a team who would struggle to stay in the Championship.
...and West Brom are infinitely worse than Liverpool. Chelsea and genius Tuchel still lost 5-2 to them after playing with ten men for most of the game last season. City with genius Pep lost 3-2 to fecking Brighton after being 2 up and playing with ten men last season, and Leicester under (fading) genius Rodgers lost 4-1 to West Ham after getting one man sent off after 40 minutes a couple of weeks ago.

It is just fecking hard to play 10 against 11 for most of the game in real life.

Edit: The only manager who has worked around it is Klopp. No Liverpool players have been sent off since 2019. Weirdly, they still lost games.
 

VivaRonaldo85

Full Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2018
Messages
1,984
4-4-1, keep the midfield tight and narrow, maintaining as high a defensive line as possible, and have your quickest fittest forward up front running the channels as best he can.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2002
Messages
52,519
Location
Founder of IhateMakeleles.org and Gourcufffanboysa
Just wondering (no particular reason!) what is the best way to set up after having a man sent off?

Obviously a lot will depend on how you start the game and the score when someone is sent off. So let’s assume (again, no particular reason!) you start with four at the back, generally dominate possession and are a goal up.

In my opinion, if you go into the game thinking your back four can keep the opposition out then have the courage of your convictions. Leave the back four as a back four.

I also think you don’t feck with minefield. Keep the shape and numbers exactly the same. If it’s good enough to win midfield when you have XI then it becomes even more important to keep a grip on midfield when you’re a man down.

So my conclusion is that the immediate response to getting a player sent off is to tweak things so that the only area you’re a man short is in the attacking third.

Other opinions are available, obviously. Especially if you have examples of other teams/managers successfully taking a different approach.

Go!
play to your strengths its that simple. We didn't and payed for that cardinal sin. We should have set up to pick young boys off on the counter. we instead set up to park the bus and sit on a lead. Which isn't our strengths and played into theirs: Which is attacking with reckless abandon

We should have been set up this way at the start of second half:
de gea - dalot varane mcguire shaw - Fred - vasn de beek pogba -- bruno- Cr7

then we should have taken pogba and bruno off because of their risky passing that loses possession against 11 men counter pressers. brought on Matic for Pogba. To act as a deep 6/3rd cb. Greenwood for Ronaldo. Lingard or Martial for bruno,. using themn as split strikers. to end up like this

de gea - dalot varane maguire shaw - matic - DVB Fred - Greenwood Lingard/Martial


even with the back 5 at worst we could have set up to counter. By encouraging shaw and dolot to attack.Then by bringing grreenwood and lingard to run either side of cr7.

we plain just bottled it
 
Last edited:

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
19,836
By getting one of their players sent off.

Easiest thing in the world and I don’t know why players/teams don’t do it more.

Just wait until you get fouled and then start “tapping out” on the floor like you’ve just broke your leg. Then run around like nothing happened 1 minute later. Worked for Young Boys and Fred should have done it just before half time to make it 10v10
Yeah it was a great performance by Martins, the scream was just loud enough for the ref to hear and not too many rolls.