giorno
boob novice
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2016
- Messages
- 26,499
- Supports
- Real Madrid
Nah, you just seemingly like unwatchable football gamesAgain - bollocks.
Nah, you just seemingly like unwatchable football gamesAgain - bollocks.
I mean, sure, but also, the '94 final was cagey because *both* teams were evidently unfit. One in particular couldn't do anything more than play for penalties...I'd prefer the cagey high-stakes of the 1994 final over, for instance, the slight anti-climactic farce of the 1998 and 2018 finals where there were players on the park evidently unfit to be there.
Superb tournament. Presence of Maradona, even though Goycochea stole the light from him a bit. One of the classics imo.Italia 90 by miles
A certified classic.Qatar 2022
1994 was actually very good with lots of goals & good matches up until the semi-final stages when the goals ran out. The fact the final was tumescent seems to negatively affect how some see the rest of the tournament.Weird to see people say 94.generally considered a quite shit world Cup overall. 98 was much better and probably the best we have had. I did really enjoy Russia 2018 as well, but 98 was the best imo.
It shouldn't. When's the last time a world cup final produced a high quality game? Argentina '78?1994 was actually very good with lots of goals & good matches up until the semi-final stages when the goals ran out. The fact the final was tumescent seems to negatively affect how some see the rest of the tournament.
That’s why Mexico 86 stands out. The final was a classic. The knockout games were poor and not many goals. I think 3 of the 4 quarter finals went to pens. The 3 knock out games which stand out was the France v Brazil, Spain v Denmark and USSR v Belgium.1994 was actually very good with lots of goals & good matches up until the semi-final stages when the goals ran out. The fact the final was tumescent seems to negatively affect how some see the rest of the tournament.
Very thin line between entertainment and high quality.It shouldn't. When's the last time a world cup final produced a high quality game? Argentina '78?
Mexico '86 for entertainment, maybe, but the game itself wasn't of particular quality
Maradona?1994. Hagi, Stoichkov, Baggio, Romario, Brolin
He played very little in that World Cup I think.Maradona?
So Mexico '86 then(full disclosure: the game was a bore and looked done until the last 20 minutes, which were entertaining)Very thin line between entertainment and high quality.
Argentina - England stood out too, iconic moments. Argentina - Romania in '94 is an overlooked WC classic imo.That’s why Mexico 86 stands out. The final was a classic. The knockout games were poor and not many goals. I think 3 of the 4 quarter finals went to pens. The 3 knock out games which stand out was the France v Brazil, Spain v Denmark and USSR v Belgium.
I was thinking about the World Cup I enjoyed the most as I was watching FIFA Uncovered on Netflix.A thread for the football history enjoyers out there and it's pretty straightforward , which Edition of the aforementioned competition was the best.
You could list your criteria as well it being the footballing strength and quality , breadth of good teams , atmosphere, the narrative surrounding it and most importantly how enjoyable it may have been.
I'm a bit biases over here due to my love of the 80s but to me 2 world cups stand shoulders above the rest the 1982 and 1986 editions, packed full of stars, enjoyable matches (legendary in fact) and even more legendary winners.
So what's your opinion.
(Mods I'm aware there are threads similar in nature to this already but I think it's a topic worth going over again and after all we're closings the occasion itself.)
I watched the whole match last year (Argentina v England) and I was shocked how poor England actually were. Gary Lineker was terrible.Argentina - England stood out too, iconic moments. Argentina - Romania in '94 is an overlooked WC classic imo.
I agree. It was definitely the World Cup with the best goals.The underrated one would be the 1978 World Cup- I know that many people don't rate this WC but maybe I'm a bit weirdo. This WC was a very attacking-minded tournament, in which a lot of teams played beautiful football( Poland, Holland, Argentina, Italy, West Germany, Austria, Peru.......). It was a transition period from the Johann-Kaiser era to another era( Zico, Kalle, young Maradona, and Platini). Some old veterans( early 1970s top/superstar players) played this WC as the last WC( Chumpitaz, Vogts, Maier, Benetti, Deyna, Rivelino, and Pirri) and some of the youngsters who would be the legend in the future played this as the first World Cup( Rummenigge, Cabrini, Hugo Sanchez, Boniek, Tardelli (23 years old) and Platini). This WC also had some of the best long rangers and screamers in the history of the World Cup the examples were Haan's against Maier and Zoff and Nelingo against Zoff.
2002 for me sucks. We know now the refs were bribed, so that makes it automatically shite for me.may I ask the reason for disliking 2002 ? it it because of south korea ?