Film Braveheart or Gladiator

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,573
Settle this once and for all, which one is better and why?
 

Igor Drefljak

Definitely Russian
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
7,156
Location
The Wastelands
Gladiator

Why? Because it's a great film, and to be honest, I've not seen Braveheart since I were a kid, so probably never really appreciated it.
 

RedSky

Shepherd’s Delight
Scout
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
74,240
Location
Hereford FC (Soccermanager)
Gladiator had by far the better fight sequences. Do not look in the background of any fight sequence in Braveheart, it'll break all immersion. :lol:

I did love Braveheart as a kid mind, but I kind of feel that film hasn't aged well. Gladiator is still as good as ever tbh.
 

Hoof the ball

Full Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
12,280
Location
San Antonio, Texas.
Phoenix's Commodus was more nuanced than the Braveheart counterpart. Much more multi-faceted and fleshed out. Crowe and Phoenix alone are enough to form a solid argument for Gladiator, even without commenting on Ridley's direction, cinematography and score.
 

El-Manos

Full Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2011
Messages
14,951
Location
Ireland
Difficult, both are great. However, I'd pick Gladiator. The story, the music, the acting. Just superb.
 

KirkDuyt

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
24,548
Location
Dutchland
Supports
Feyenoord
Gladiator for me. But mostly because Mel Gibson hasnt aged well.
 

Tiber

Full Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
10,275
Of Those two? Gladiator without hesitation.

What a speech
 

DVG7

New Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2019
Messages
2,381
Gladiator aged far better and was far more realistic.
 

Ish

Lights on for Luke
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
32,171
Location
Voted the best city in the world
Both in my top 10, maybe top 5 of all time.

Braveheart for me. The English on the Caf seemingly dislikes their PM & royal family, so I'm not sure but would there be possible bias on here against Braveheart? (actually thinking about it, maybe for Braveheart :lol:).

Anyway. Love both movies. Add Shawshank Redemption in there.
 

duffer

Sensible and not a complete jerk like most oppo's
Scout
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
50,357
Location
Chelsea (the saviours of football) fan.
Both in my top 10, maybe top 5 of all time.

Braveheart for me. The English on the Caf seemingly dislikes their PM & royal family, so I'm not sure but would there be possible bias on here against Braveheart? (actually thinking about it, maybe for Braveheart :lol:).

Anyway. Love both movies. Add Shawshank Redemption in there.
Nah, the English win at the end of Braveheart, don't they?

Plus the King in it is one of the best baddies ever.
 

Ish

Lights on for Luke
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
32,171
Location
Voted the best city in the world
Nah, the English win at the end of Braveheart, don't they?

Plus the King in it is one of the best baddies ever.
Longshanks. :lol: Feck dude, I've watched both of these movies way too many times. A pity the King's son was such a "let down". ;)

Yeah, they rightfully slay William Wallace, but as the narration go....the Scots ended up winning under Bruce?
 

Organic Potatoes

Full Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2013
Messages
17,155
Location
85R723R2+R6
Supports
Colorado Rapids
Braveheart, by some distance.

Name another movie with a story so compelling you feel sorry for Mel Gibson, and has Sophie Marceau...exactly.
 

InfiniteBoredom

Full Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2013
Messages
13,665
Location
Melbourne
Both films are a travesty historically but Gladiator is actually well made, the soundtrack by Hans Zimmer is arguably his finest work ever.

Acting performance wise Gladiator also tramples all over Braveheart, Connie Nielsen and Joaquin Phoenix were mesmerizing, can’t say the same for Sophie Marceau and Patrick McGoohan (Longshanks).
 

Spark

Full Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2012
Messages
2,264
Watched Braveheart recently, as fancied a classic.

What an utter shite film.

Gladiator is a film I watch easily twice a year thinking I haven’t seen it in ages. Absolutely cracking, a million miles better than Braveheart.
 

2cents

Historiographer, and obtainer of rare antiquities
Scout
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
16,276
Watched Braveheart recently, as fancied a classic.

What an utter shite film.

Gladiator is a film I watch easily twice a year thinking I haven’t seen it in ages. Absolutely cracking, a million miles better than Braveheart.
Exactly how I feel.
 

KirkDuyt

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
24,548
Location
Dutchland
Supports
Feyenoord
This topic makes me want to watch Rob Roy.

By far the best movie in the Taken franchise.
 

sherrinford

Full Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2017
Messages
1,198
Both films are a travesty historically but Gladiator is actually well made, the soundtrack by Hans Zimmer is arguably his finest work ever.

Acting performance wise Gladiator also tramples all over Braveheart, Connie Nielsen and Joaquin Phoenix were mesmerizing, can’t say the same for Sophie Marceau and Patrick McGoohan (Longshanks).
Come on, Longshanks was a great baddie!
 

InfiniteBoredom

Full Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2013
Messages
13,665
Location
Melbourne
Come on, Longshanks was a great baddie!
The actor had great charisma and screen presence, but he wasn’t given much to work with, just a by the book villain with no redeeming quality, from the first scene when he walked in and chuck his son’s advisor out of the window, you can see that coming from miles away.

One thing I’ll say in favor of that film is that no matter how surreal it got, there’s nothing as ridiculous as Maximus continuing to be a slave after the very public declaration in the Collosseum.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
Braveheart has been doing the rounds of Sky Movies recently. It hasn’t half aged terribly. Still a fun watch, mind.

Gladiator is better acted, better directed and better to look at. The score, as commented upon, will always be phenomenal.

Gladiator all day.
 

sherrinford

Full Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2017
Messages
1,198
The actor had great charisma and screen presence, but he wasn’t given much to work with, just a by the book villain with no redeeming quality, from the first scene when he walked in and chuck his son’s advisor out of the window, you can see that coming from miles away.

One thing I’ll say in favor of that film is that no matter how surreal it got, there’s nothing as ridiculous as Maximus continuing to be a slave after the very public declaration in the Collosseum.
He’s good at it though, nothing wrong with that.

Both films are great - is there a historical epic to match them?
 

Redplane

( . Y . ) planned for Christmas
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
10,354
Location
The Royal Kingdom of Trumpistan
Gladiator because it didn't completely make a joke of actual historical events. Don't get me wrong - I love Braveheart in its own right, it has it all in a way, but Gladiator in many ways is much more memorable.

I still remember the chills I got from the opening battle scene, the emotion from when Maximus found his wife and son, the anger and hatred I felt for Commodus. Tbh - can't think of any other movie I had those vast range of intense emotions with.
 

InfiniteBoredom

Full Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2013
Messages
13,665
Location
Melbourne
Gladiator because it didn't completely make a joke of actual historical events. Don't get me wrong - I love Braveheart in its own right, it has it all in a way, but Gladiator in many ways is much more memorable.

I still remember the chills I got from the opening battle scene, the emotion from when Maximus found his wife and son, the anger and hatred I felt for Commodus.
Except if you are talking strictly about historicity, Braveheart holds up better than Gladiator.

Maximus was completely made up, Commodus was always designed as heir (Marcus Aurelius went against the then long established tradition of adopting a competent public servant/military commander as protégée and heir in favour of his own blood, and the dude was actually choked to death in his bath by a Gladiator hired by a mistress of his)