Someone post the Dominic Raab exchange. Can't believe anyone would read that and think it's a good idea to vote Tory or that Brexit isn't all a sham!
Brexited | the worst threads live the longest
- Thread starter Silva
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik and Imran hold a long overdue conversation about United's awful league form with 1 win in 7. They discuss a disappointing draw at Bournemouth, a not so disappointing draw against Liverpool and a crushing defeat at Chelsea - Is time nearly over for Erik Ten Hag?
Then in a special second half of the pod, Nik welcomes Natalie ( https://twitter.com/natalie_17) to discuss the fortunes of Manchester United Women as they booked a place in the FA Cup Final after a historic first ever win vs. Chelsea.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technolo...rron-banks&link_location=live-reporting-story
We've got our BBC story!
We've got our BBC story!
If they're going to cover this up any difference between them and RT will be historic. Wouldn't surprise me anymore.
The real news is that the russians have given up on Aaron and his pals though. This leak isn't coincidence (being on the day of the debate).
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
If these are genuine why on Earth are they communicating via direct message on Twitter?
Apparently the real ones are here. https://twitter.com/number10leaks
It all reads like the script from one of those bad movies on the syfy channel.
Jesus, it's not difficult to work out that one is fake - it's Guy Ritchie meets The Young Ones, ffs.
Wow he even says nice things about Corbyn.
people will fall for anything these days
Did sound like something Banks would say.
Just tried to call the number on the most recent leek. Phone rang but no answer.
Wigmore is losing his shit. Very amusing.
There's numbers for Nadine Dorries, Julia Hartley-Brewer and now Banks own number just appeared on there.
That number 10 leaks account will be suspended in no time if it's posting personal phone numbers surely?
Edit:
Latest has George Galloway seemingly going cap in hand to Banks for hand outs. Desperate stuff.
Edit:
Latest has George Galloway seemingly going cap in hand to Banks for hand outs. Desperate stuff.
Last edited:
Sigh...
Phwoar this is just like when Hitler stole our sunbeds on the French riveria!Sigh...
Gareth Winston Churchill Southgate will show them!
EU negotiator dismisses Johnson's post-Brexit trade deal claims
It will not be possible to negotiate a comprehensive trade deal in the 11-month transition period that would follow an exit from the bloc on 31 January, the EU’s chief negotiator Michel Barnier has told a private meeting of senior MEPs in Strasbourg.
The UK is due to leave the single market and customs union at the end of December 2020 under the terms of the withdrawal agreement. At that point, new arrangements – or none – will come into force. Any extension to the UK’s membership of the single market and customs union would need to be agreed before 1 July.
Barnier said that, if such an extension was not sought by the UK, negotiators would “need to focus on specific subjects” and that agreement on various issues, including the rights of British air carriers to operate as they do today, would have to wait until after 2020.
Barnier said the key areas on which the negotiators would work in the coming year would be trade in goods, data, fisheries, aviation, police and judicial cooperation.
The goal for the EU is to agree on “zero quotas, zero tariffs and zero dumping”, he said in a reference to the bloc’s determination to ensure that the UK signs up to a high degree of regulatory alignment to ensure British companies do not have a competitive advantage post-Brexit.
Barnier also told MEPs that the “toughest question” would be the EU’s insistence that free movement in goods comes as a package with the free movement of people. He added that the most “difficult outcome” for the EU would be a hung parliament as it would imperil ratification of the deal in Westminster.
The prime minister has claimed the UK can conclude a trade deal in time, though experts had already pointed out that such deal typically take years to negotiate and ratify.
We know it's impossible to do it in 11 months but you ain't heard nothing yet - Labour will do it in three, any advance on three, there at the back...
It will not be possible to negotiate a comprehensive trade deal in the 11-month transition period that would follow an exit from the bloc on 31 January, the EU’s chief negotiator Michel Barnier has told a private meeting of senior MEPs in Strasbourg.
The UK is due to leave the single market and customs union at the end of December 2020 under the terms of the withdrawal agreement. At that point, new arrangements – or none – will come into force. Any extension to the UK’s membership of the single market and customs union would need to be agreed before 1 July.
Barnier said that, if such an extension was not sought by the UK, negotiators would “need to focus on specific subjects” and that agreement on various issues, including the rights of British air carriers to operate as they do today, would have to wait until after 2020.
Barnier said the key areas on which the negotiators would work in the coming year would be trade in goods, data, fisheries, aviation, police and judicial cooperation.
The goal for the EU is to agree on “zero quotas, zero tariffs and zero dumping”, he said in a reference to the bloc’s determination to ensure that the UK signs up to a high degree of regulatory alignment to ensure British companies do not have a competitive advantage post-Brexit.
Barnier also told MEPs that the “toughest question” would be the EU’s insistence that free movement in goods comes as a package with the free movement of people. He added that the most “difficult outcome” for the EU would be a hung parliament as it would imperil ratification of the deal in Westminster.
The prime minister has claimed the UK can conclude a trade deal in time, though experts had already pointed out that such deal typically take years to negotiate and ratify.
We know it's impossible to do it in 11 months but you ain't heard nothing yet - Labour will do it in three, any advance on three, there at the back...
Isn't that due to the withdrawal agreement being much more closely aligned with the EU and as such a trade agreement being easier to sort out?
No because firstly the Uk would have to leave first before trade negotiations start. If Labour want a Brexit in name only which Labour remain supporters think is what Corbyn means then Labour would have to accept freedom of movement unconditionally and be in the customs union, neither of which Corbyn is suggesting.
But... Unicorns
I hope your post is true, but I just can’t see it.
Conservative manifesto policies lie. But they give people money.
The Labour manifesto is a horror show and has pathetically stupid policies in it that are attackable and rejectable.
It’s perfect.
You're a butt unicorn.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
What a melt.As funny as it is, it's a microcosm of the whole problem with Brexit, where the opinions of ignorant blowhards are given the same platform as the opinions of experts.
Stealing that. Thank you Sir
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
They capture the role of the BBC perfectly.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...ustoms-arrangements-could-thwart-brexit-plans
For those who thought the NI issue was now solved, think again.
For those who thought the NI issue was now solved, think again.
The harbor of Ghent in Belgium is planning a Brexit-parking, for up to 540 trucks and a new customs office. Crazy.
I have never understood the "I voted remain, but..." brigade.
If there was another referendum, would you switch to leave, even though you support remain? What a travesty that would be.
If there was another referendum, would you switch to leave, even though you support remain? What a travesty that would be.
Michel Barnier, the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator, has been recorded telling a private meeting that the EU would not be able to conclude a full trade negotiation with the EU by the end of next year, as Boris Johnson claims. As the Independent reports in its scoop, Barnier said:
Come on Michel, it's either 11 months or 3 months and Brexit will be sorted. You're not reading the script.
Why do you pretend to be dumb? The 3 months is a withdrawal agreement and a political declaration which outlines the basis for the future relationship. The 3 months refers to what Johnson has now not a full trade deal.
It will be closer to Europe with a customs union as minimum and even single market possibly but leaving the political institutions. That requires very little further negotiations as it’s effectively BRINO so it and can be implemented much much faster after the referendum even within 6 months should the country choose so.
Been through this dozens of times. How can you possibly believe this load of crap?