I can't believe I'm having to explain the value of the per 90 stat but I guess I have to. If a player, lets call him Bruno plays 50 games and contributes 15 goals and another player Kevin plays 25 games and contributes 10 goals well then Kevin has performed better. The per 90 stat whittles down player's effectiveness for when they're on the pitch. It's really very useful but I suspect you know that and are trying to dismiss it because it doesn't suit your point.
Scoring goals and assisting goals are the 2 main things attacking players do. They might be dribbling game breakers, not Bruno, or hardworking but primarily they are assessed on their output. As I've said the players who everybody agrees as having had a good season are at the top of this chart, which leads me to my next point. You ignored my Saka argument because it highlights exactly how valuable my stat is. Last year he was 3rd and everyone thought he was great and this year he's struggled and is way down the list. Please address this point.
I highlighted De Bruyne because I was told there was no player who could be so consistent and now I'm told that's because he was in a great team, so I highlighted players that weren't in great teams who outperformed Bruno over the course of a season.
I have led you to the water but you will not drink. I'm not wasting any more time.