Bury - EFL to discuss re-entry to L2 | and Bolton - sold

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,173
Location
Montevideo
Re Bury FC, "It's probably the biggest day in their history. Today Bury, the town, might not have a football club. It's absolutely disgraceful." said the multimillionaire former footballer Phil Neville.
Your point being?
 

Lay

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
19,982
Location
England
Re Bury FC, "It's probably the biggest day in their history. Today Bury, the town, might not have a football club. It's absolutely disgraceful." said the multimillionaire former footballer Phil Neville.
Don’t understand? Do you want Phil to put money into Bury just because he’s a millionaire?
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
22,067
Location
Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
Re Bury FC, "It's probably the biggest day in their history. Today Bury, the town, might not have a football club. It's absolutely disgraceful." said the multimillionaire former footballer Phil Neville.
So if he goes around giving all his EARNED money to struggling clubs, he wouldn't be a multimillionaire.

Read his interview.... he's clearly pissed at Dale and it's personal for him because of parents involvement with the club.

Maybe he should have just said "ah feck em"?
 

Lynty

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2014
Messages
3,094
Let's compare 2 sides:

Huddersfield:
TV Money: £12.3 million which is minimum for all teams shown live 10 matches. The sum increases by £1.1 million for each additional game after number 10 regardless of home or away game.

Prize Money: All teams in the P.L are guaranteed £79 million in addition to a bonus depending on position. Huddersfield ended last received a bonus of just £1.9 million

In total Huddersfield received £93 millioner for doing horribly bad in the Premier League. The better and more popular teams received about £40 million more.


Leeds:
TV Money: A team in the Championship get from £100.000-180.000 for home matches - Close to nothing for away matches. Can't remember the details but midweek matches earn you more, weekend less. Leeds was live 24 times and is believed to have made about £2.5 million in TV-Money for being shown 24 times.

Prize Money: All teams in the Championship have a fixed Prize Money - £2.3 million for 2018, believed to be 10% higher for 2019. In addition they get a solidarity payment to help bridge the gap between the Championship and the P.L) of £4.5 million for 2018- expected to rise to £4.7 million for 2019.

Leeds for being the most popular and almost the best team in Championship received a total of roughly £9.5 million. That is almost exactly 10% of what Huddersfield received for being crap.


Let's for sake of argument say that Huddersfield signed 6 players on a free transfer and paid them as little as £15.000 a week - which by P.L standards is next to nothing. When Huddersfield get relegated and don't go up again after 2 years - these 6 players will cost the club £4.5 million a year in wages. And that is just for these 6 players. As Huddersfield is a lot less popular club than Leeds, they realistically will receive £8 million in TV and Prize Money. You don't have to have a Shady chairman or spending a huge amount of Money to end up in problems if you get relegated from the P.L

And that is why so many clubs get relegated 2-3 times almost in succession when they get relegated. They can have extremely low wages by P.L standards, but extremely high by Championship standards.

Clubs being relegated into the Championship need to offload players extremely quick, but not all players want to go. Look at us With Rojo, Darmian and Sanchez. And by off-loading their best players they also ruin their chances of going back up again. If a club like Huddersfield are stuck With 2-3 poor signings making £20.000 a week - how easy will they be to get rid of ?

So of course the gap is the problem. In order to survive in the P.L you need to spend a bit of Money - but someone will get relegated and then they haven't got the Financials to survive. Huddersfield will not come back to the P.L in the near future, Brighton and Burnley will probably struggle if they get relegated.
I think your missing my point.

Everyone knows there's a gulf in money. The pros/cons of having all the money in the Premier League is a discussion for another thread.

But I'm talking about money trickling down the ladder to third and fourth tier. Where there isn't a spotlight on how owners run clubs and how they spend the money. Doubling everyone's pool of money isn't going to solve anything. It creates an inflation effect where players can demand a better salary, and clubs will pay better players more money chasing success. It's naïve to think that these clubs will put aside money for 'hard times/relegation bounces' when immediate success is the name of the game.

Bury's average wage is £2.4kp/w (middle ground for league 1). Introducing more cash into this league, someone like Jermaine Beckford can request £4kp/w. Then League 2 players can also request an increase, or go sit on the bench at Bury, so the average salary in League 2 rises to £2kp/w. Your more likely to create a fifth tier of pro football (where a players are paid an average full time wage and clubs struggle to stay afloat) than bridge the gap in money.

https://www.footy.com/footballers-vs-the-fans/#efl-league-two

It would be better to introduce a wage cap for each tier, mandatory salary cuts for relegation or shorter contract lengths in the lower leagues. All of which come with their own problems or would mean teams relinquishing some of their power.

It's not an easy problem, and throwing money at it isn't the solution.




Another aspect is the laughable 'fit and proper' owner checks.
 

Cheech Wizard

Liverpool fan
Joined
Jul 2, 2013
Messages
6,803
Location
Lé Fylde Coast
Supports
Liverpool
Went into admin twice at that time scarily close to folding as a club the 80s on the whole were dark days
Blackpool were in the same boat too around that time in the 80's. Previous owners racked up debts and tried to sell the ground for supermarket site before the council stopped it. They got so low down the leagues, you had to get voted back in the football league back then. Then eventually the club was sold for £1 to the Oystons would you believe.
 

diarm

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2014
Messages
16,753
Rather than Premier League clubs paying to keep lower League clubs sustainable, I'd prefer to see limits on the number of youth and reserve players big clubs can stockpile.

Rather than having all the talented kids and youth coaches at a handful of top flight clubs, have quotas so more of them are dispersed around the leagues and the quality of the product will improve.

Smaller clubs will receive greater transfer fees for their more developed stars as the Chelseas and Uniteds of the league can't just hoover up bucket loads of them when they're under 16.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,112
Rather than Premier League clubs paying to keep lower League clubs sustainable, I'd prefer to see limits on the number of youth and reserve players big clubs can stockpile.

Rather than having all the talented kids and youth coaches at a handful of top flight clubs, have quotas so more of them are dispersed around the leagues and the quality of the product will improve.

Smaller clubs will receive greater transfer fees for their more developed stars as the Chelseas and Uniteds of the league can't just hoover up bucket loads of them when they're under 16.
That rule change that capped the fee big clubs would have to pay for players under a certain age (not sure if it was 16 or 18) was an utter disgrace.

Take an example from Wycombe.
We sold Ibe to Liverpool, decent fee upfront, and then a big fee as a sell on as part of the 15m sale to Bournemouth.

Probably 20-25 times the maximum we'd receive now.
 

DavidDeSchmikes

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Messages
17,243
Hearing on Sky Sports News, it is some London consortium. The reporter said maybe betting.
Still a bit vague
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Rather than Premier League clubs paying to keep lower League clubs sustainable, I'd prefer to see limits on the number of youth and reserve players big clubs can stockpile.

Rather than having all the talented kids and youth coaches at a handful of top flight clubs, have quotas so more of them are dispersed around the leagues and the quality of the product will improve.

Smaller clubs will receive greater transfer fees for their more developed stars as the Chelseas and Uniteds of the league can't just hoover up bucket loads of them when they're under 16.
Wrong approach IMO. Too much talent will go to waste. If anything they should be compensated further for said players.
These players shouldn't be deprived of top level coaching so they can stay in kick and rush sides further down the leagues
 

Reducation

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Messages
1,524
Location
Northern England
Don’t understand? Do you want Phil to put money into Bury just because he’s a millionaire?
Well he has more than enough, and it would help. It'd be nice of him.

So if he goes around giving all his EARNED money to struggling clubs, he wouldn't be a multimillionaire.
I don't think he'd be interested in doing that, but he could give significant help to Bury FC.
 

DavidDeSchmikes

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Messages
17,243
I’ve heard one of the Bury chair people saying this guy is an asset stripper and blaming the league for their fit and proper person test but don’t they have a responsibility to do their own due diligence too? I mean his directorships would have been visible with an internet search.
I would think they do, but i'm not sure. What has happened at Bury and Bolton shows how important due diligence is, and how the fit and proper test is not fit for purpose
 

diarm

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2014
Messages
16,753
Wrong approach IMO. Too much talent will go to waste. If anything they should be compensated further for said players.
These players shouldn't be deprived of top level coaching so they can stay in kick and rush sides further down the leagues
If the big clubs are stockpiling less players, they'll stockpile less coaches too. Work on changing the mentality of coaching and tactics in the lower divisions and instead of talent going to waste, see talent thriving below and driving up the standard above.
 

galwayfa

Full Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
751
Wonder would the way to go be any new buyer of a club, they put 2million in to a holding fund given to English fa, this money would need to be given before takeover is complete, that in the case of them not being able to afford wages there would be that money to fall back on
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,173
Location
Montevideo
I would think they do, but i'm not sure. What has happened at Bury and Bolton shows how important due diligence is, and how the fit and proper test is not fit for purpose
Can people stop saying this? Previous owner was up shit creek and sold to new owner. Newsflash: private companies can be bought and sold.

Due dilligence was NOT the problem here, they both knew what shit they were getting the club into.

Fit and proper was NOT passed. If anything, the FA have been on Dale's back because he did NOT pass it. It does not preclude someone buying a club though, all the FA can action is removal of the club's registration, they can't stop a private transaction happening.

What this highlights though is how vulnerable clubs are to this sort of unscrupulous scum. Given their role in the community and the emotional investment involved, the government would do well at looking at specific conditions when the asset being bought/sold is a football club. Easier said than done, mind. Defining which companies are/aren't part of a football club must be a minefield.
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,280
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
The EFL have given the potential new owners until 5pm Tuesday (Monday being a bank holiday) to take over. The buyers insist they need to complete the due diligence process so they know what they're buying - assets and all debts. So, whilst there's hope, it's certainly not a done deal.

The EFL statement


The response from the potential buyer C&N Sporting Risk is that it might be impossible for them to do the necessary work in the time given.
https://www.burytimes.co.uk/news/17...-fears-prospective-new-bury-owners-need-time/
 
Last edited:

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,280
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
Looks grim from the sound of the Bolton administrator's statement:
https://www.bwfc.co.uk/news/2019/au...on-joint-administrator-for-bolton-wanderers4/
I guess that's their last shot at getting the sides to actually come up with a solution.

The sale has dragged on for weeks, so it always felt very fragile. The fact that is was also caught up in legal action (including the Bassini/Anderson case that's still ongoing) and the split of assets club/hotel being interlinked in terms of viability, but legally separate businesses with separate administrators.

Sale "almost" agreed on Friday, collapsed on Saturday. Rays of hope on Sunday. Anybody's guess if the vested interests can actually deliver a satisfactory answer to the EFL next week. No wonder the EFL and the administrators are talking about pulling the plug.
 

Luke1995

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2016
Messages
3,460
Portsmouth was in a similar situation to Bolton a few years ago and managed to bounce back

This doesn't look very good though
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,280
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
Bury - the remaining club staff have opened the ticket office and the stadium. They appealed over the weekend for cleaning supplies and volunteers to get the stadium ready to play on Saturday.

Will they still exist on Saturday? Anyone's guess really. EFL say they've seen proof of funds from the potential buyers. The buyers say that their own due diligence work and review of the accounts can't be expected to be done in one working day (Dale didn't speak to them until Friday).

Will they be able to satisfy the EFL that it's worth letting them have a shot at it, even if the legally binding paperwork isn't in place? Will they have a match on Saturday? Who knows.
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,280
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
Bolton's deal meanwhile, which always looked fragile is currently completely stalled.

Football Ventures, who were named as preferred bidders months ago, still haven't completed. Unless they can buy the hotel at the same time, their business plan apparently doesn't add up. At the moment, it looks like someone else is buying the hotel.

If the club administrators allow it, another bidder may come in for the club. So far alternate bidders haven't been given access to the club accounts, because FV were supposed to have been already chosen.

One way or another, something has to change and change fast. The pot of money the administrators were using to run the club has run out. They say they'll have to liquidate the club this week themselves if nothing changes. The EFL are expected to put them on a two week notice of expulsion today.

One way or another their fate gets settled in the next few days.
 

Spiersey

Full Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
7,386
Location
United Kingdom.
Supports
Chelsea
Apparently Campbell has pulled out of the deal.

Entire deal didn’t make any sense barring for free publicity for him. His company are opening a new statistics product (was meant to be released in July and has been delayed). There’s no way someone with his background would be interested in a club in the situation that Bury is in. All feels like he just did it to get his name out there and try and get more customers for the product being released. He was on that Beat the bookies show earlier this month trying to plug the new product as well.
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,280
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
It was always going to be a tough one. It looks like Bury had just too many undisclosed liabilities, dodgy deals and people (still) hoping to get a last bite of the rapidly rotting cherry. No surprise given their last two owners but very sad.