That’s exactly what good managers do actually and is probably the best piece of management we have seen from Amorim at United so far.
Had he not shown flexibility and tactical nous we absolutely would not be looking at European final or Champions League football.
Good players give managers alternatives, and that is a good thing.
I think, you are missing a point. Pretty sure the poster wasn't against being pragmatic and somewhat flexible when it comes to prepare for individual matches here and there. Thats fine and necessary and takes into account, who is available, who is in form, who are we playing against and so on. What the other poster alluded to, I personally would totally agree with it, is us sometimes clinging onto temporary solutions like for example "find a way to get some use out of a certain player". That simply can't be the way forward. A system requires certain players to fulfill roles and while it is fine to adjust on a micro level for something like "the next 2 to 3 games", it must not be something that bleeds into longterm plans. The system is the skeleton, it is supposed to provide a possibility for as many players as possible to shine in their roles. When one player can't fulfill his role, than his role has to be adapted, often making the role of another player more difficult. Or the system has to be adjusted as a whole, which effects every other player.
You are right of course, pragmatism and adaptiveness is an important quality, potentially even one of the most important. But it shines even brighter when applied to teams who have a solid foundation to fall back on. Uniteds situation is different though, I feel. We haven't gone with the times, we missed trends, we tried to act as if we were the same team in the same league with the same financial environment as 20 years ago. From an on-field organisational level, we were left far behind - good players might be able to soften the blow here and there but if the chasm gets too big, results will show. Which is what we've seen throughout the last years.
This has to be the main objective right now. Not finding ways to make do with "good players" since "there are available". Those times will come back, I am sure about it, but first we have to close the gap.
I think most of our contracts have that clause.
The question is whether the rumored 350K GBP that he supposedly receives per week include the CL bonus or is the CL bonus outside that.
Pretty sure the 350k is with CL money.
We simply can't be that dumb.
You can blame it on the players if it happened once or twice, but if same thing happened for the whole season? It can only be blamed at manager either for lack of authority to punish players or lack of tactical acument ie it was all by design, i think i knew which one was that.
I don't want to exclude the manager completely from criticism here, thats why I said, I think it is overstated. He should have adjusted especially after more and more injuries made the whole approach less and less effective. But the approach wasn't entirely fruitless. Iirc there was a point in time, where we were the team with the highest number of high turnovers, so the aggressive pressing was doing what it was supposed to, it was just canceled out because our attackers being unable to convert those turnovers into goals.