Casemiro image 18

Casemiro Brazil flag

2025-26 Performances


View full 2025-26 profile

6.0 Season Average Rating
Appearances
30
Goals
6
Assists
2
Yellow cards
10
Red cards
1
I would appreciate to keep it to the posts, not the poster.

That’s exactly what it is, your post was a novel to explain away real World quotes from the player and Perez to fit your confirmation bias.

You have literally said that you don’t believe what Casemiro has said, nor do you believe what Perez has said and your only explanation as to why this is, is because your own confirmation bias cannot believe it to be true?

How is that attacking you?
 
You are saying that my supposed confirmation bias is the reason for my post and that I "make up" stories. Do you think thats a neutral conversation?
 
Does the story you posted about PR spin contain any facts? Or does it directly contradict what the player and Perez himself have said?
There is no story

Casemiro was offered a long contract on a high salary. Thats not a story.
Real Madrid was offered an unreasonably high fee given that the player in question was ageing. Thats not a story, you might disagree with the extent of "unreasonably high" but that is what happened.
United was chasing FDJ all summer but then, seemingly out of nowhere brought in Casemiro - a very different player. Thats not a story, it is exactly what happened.

Was Real Madrid receiving 70 million for Casemiro a favorable move for Real Madrid? Yes, for sure.
Was it a favorable move for Casemiro? Most likely yes, financially for sure. New challenge, yes. In terms of standing in the team, yes. In terms of the team itself, no.

So when I say that there might be a PR spin in play with some of the public statements, thats a made up story? I explicitly said that I don't think anybody lied but they presented a version of the story that put them in the best light possible. If you want to believe that Perez heavy-heartedly agreed to let the player leave he already brought in the shiny replacement for, - for a fee that balanced the fee for that shiny replacement, go for it.
 
Last edited:
Was Real Madrid receiving 70 million for Casemiro a favorable move for Real Madrid? Yes, for sure.

In your opinion.

I wouldn’t have sold a 30 yr old Keane or Robson or Scholes for that myself like.
Your own club just rejected a bigger offer from Saudi Arabia for a 30 year-old Bruno Fernandes.

The problem for you is that Casemiro himself has confirmed that Perez asked him to stay and reject the deal and did not want him to leave.
You just think that because you think it is a great price that must not be true. Surely you see how you’re making up a story that directly contradicts the facts, because your confirmation bias is that it was too good a deal for Perez not to actually be delighted about it.
You’re simply acting like football is nothing but a balance sheet.

Madrid and Perez aren’t that stupid though especially considering Modrić won four Champions League titles after turning 30, and Kroos won three Champions League titles after turning 30. They wouldn’t have been happy about a 60m + add ons offer aged 30 for either of them.
 
Last edited:
In your opinion.

I wouldn’t have sold a 30 yr old Keane or Robson or Scholes for that myself like.

The problem for you is that Casemiro himself has confirmed that Perez asked him to stay and reject the deal and did not want him to leave.
You just think that because you think it is a great price that must not be true. Surely you see how you’re making up a story that directly contradicts the facts, because your confirmation bias is that it was too good a deal for Perez not to actually be delighted about it.

Stop stop he's already dead
 
You can’t help loving him, absolute legend of the game, who seem to genuinely love playing at Old Trafford.

Would be a great example for him and Maguire to take a pay cut and help the team out for another season.

But I’m not sure that is a realistic possibility in today’s game.
 
In your opinion.

I wouldn’t have sold a 30 yr old Keane or Robson or Scholes for that myself like.
Ok. As I said, the extent of "unreasonably" might be debatable. I have my stance (but I am neither the first, nor the only one with it) and you have a different one. But I am sure you don't want to claim that your take on that question is the only universally valid take, right?
The problem for you is that Casemiro himself has confirmed that Perez asked him to stay and reject the deal and did not want him to leave.
You just think that because you think it is a great price that must not be true. Surely you see how you’re making up a story that directly contradicts the facts, because your confirmation bias is that it was too good a deal for Perez not to actually be delighted about it.
All that relies on you assuming that what they said, is fact. If Perez didn't want Casemiro to leave, he didn't have to accept the offer. If Casemiro didn't want to leave, he could have stayed for as long as he had a contract at Madrid. But that isn't what happened. What happened was favorable to Real, mostly favorable for the player. Thats not a story, thats the actual outcome. But such sober pragmatism usually doesn't fly - it would make Perez look a little less graceful, it would make the player look a little less connected to the club and it would make United look ...like United. To circumvent that, lets spin it slightly differently. No victim, no judge. I am a bit shocked, that this seems to be so controversial for some of you.
 
. What happened was favorable to Real

You keep falling into the same trap again and again, it doesn’t matter how many times you post this but this here is your confirmation bias written down.
YOU simply cannot believe what they have said because YOU are convinced it was a great deal for them.

Do you think it would’ve been favourable for Madrid to have accepted a similar offer for Kroos at the same age? Or to have accepted a similar offer for Modrić at the same age?
Would it for example have been favourable for us to have sold Scholes at that age?
 
Last edited:
If he keeps this level until the end of the season, i would sell/loan Ugarte and sign another two midfielders for next season. Ideally Anderson and another holding midfielder.

Casemiro/New DM. Anderson/Mainoo

The new DM with the potential to learn and take Casemiro's place in 27/28.
 
There is no story

Casemiro was offered a long contract on a high salary. Thats not a story.
Real Madrid was offered an unreasonably high fee given that the player in question was ageing. Thats not a story, you might disagree with the extent of "unreasonably high" but that is what happened.
United was chasing FDJ all summer but then, seemingly out of nowhere brought in Casemiro - a very different player. Thats not a story, it is exactly what happened.

Was Real Madrid receiving 70 million for Casemiro a favorable move for Real Madrid? Yes, for sure.
Was it a favorable move for Casemiro? Most likely yes, financially for sure. New challenge, yes. In terms of standing in the team, yes. In terms of the team itself, no.

So when I say that there might be a PR spin in play with some of the public statements, thats a made up story? I explicitly said that I don't think anybody lied but they presented a version of the story that put them in the best light possible. If you want to believe that Perez heavy-heartedly agreed to let the player leave he already brought in the shiny replacement for, - for a fee that balanced the fee for that shiny replacement, go for it.
This isn’t what actually happened though. Fred himself shared that Casemiro had asked him about United and whether he should join MONTHS before he signed. Just because it seemed out of nowhere at the time doesn’t make it true.
 
You keep falling into the same trap again and again, it doesn’t matter how many times you post this but this here is your confirmation bias written down.
YOU simply cannot believe what they have said because YOU are convinced it was a great deal for them.
I could say the exact same thing about your standpoint as well. And once again - If you want to stick to your stance, I am not going to hinder you. But you haven't heard me talking about you making up stories or acting from your confirmation bias.
Do you think it would’ve been favourable for Madrid to have accepted a similar offer for Kroos at the same age? Or to have accepted a similar offer for Modrić at the same age?
I don't know whether they would have taken such offers, I personally don't think they would have. Because Kroos and Modric were the technical department in that midfield. Kroos had already shown that age didn't affect him as much since his game was more about positioning and passing than covering space. Modric mostly the same although slightly different aspects. I am pretty sure that Camavinga was earmarked to take over from one of them but he wasn't as established as Tchouameni was at the time. I do remember though seeing discussions online of Real Madrid fans who thought that it is about time to move away from those players who played their roles way longer than it usually happens. But the way forward was difficult to predict since the chances of replacing such a midfield with those exact types was clearly a very difficult task. So it is impossible to say what kind of offers they would have entertained. Only thing we know for sure is that the offer for Casemiro was accepted. And there weren't many reports about any haggling.

I didn't say Uniteds offer was so favorable just because of Casemiros age. It was favorable because of his age AND because his replacements have already been brought in.
 
This isn’t what actually happened though. Fred himself shared that Casemiro had asked him about United and whether he should join MONTHS before he signed. Just because it seemed out of nowhere at the time doesn’t make it true.
I haven't seen such a report yet but I agree, if there were reports like that, maybe the thing was better prepared than I think. It wouldn't change much else of what I said though - it would have still been odd to chase FDJ only to bring in Casemiro instead. And the figures connected would still be favoring Real Madrid (at least I think that they favored Madrid).
 
I haven't seen such a report yet but I agree, if there were reports like that, maybe the thing was better prepared than I think. It wouldn't change much else of what I said though - it would have still been odd to chase FDJ only to bring in Casemiro instead. And the figures connected would still be favoring Real Madrid (at least I think that they favored Madrid).

And Perez was popping the champers when he got rid of him. Got it
 
Funny given how touchy you got earlier.

If you want to believe everyone involved in and tangentially involved in the transfer was lying go and do that
I will. And it gets even funnier when you still think that I accused anybody of lying despite me saying that I explicitly don't do that. And for the record, I didn't label you as touchy but the subject.
 
I could say the exact same thing about your standpoint as well. And once again - If you want to stick to your stan.

Well no you can’t, when Casemiro tells the World Perez asked him to stay, I’m not assuming he’s lying, I’m taking it at face value.

You believe everyone involved is lying, you are the conspiratorial one here.
 
I will. And it gets even funnier when you still think that I accused anybody of lying despite me saying that I explicitly don't do that. And for the record, I didn't label you as touchy but the subject.

Ancelotti started when I told him I was set to leave Real Madrid”, Casemiro says.

“Everything was done with Man United, I decided to enter Carlo Ancelotti’s office… he started crying”.

“So he told me: ‘Case, I don’t know... ! ’ !”.

“It was the only moment where I doubted leaving Real Madrid. It was so difficult, also because the president Florentino Pérez didn’t even want to let me leave”.

“I wanted to try something new at Man United but I’m still supporting Real and I suffer during the games!”.

“I’ll always love Real Madrid, it’s part of my life”,

And….

When talks were at final stages with Man United on personal terms, Florentino Pérez did not want me to leave.

“He didn’t want to talk to me about leaving Real Madrid. I had to talk to other people at the club”

Is Cas lying, or did Perez want him to stay?
It’s one or the other.
 
I haven't seen such a report yet but I agree, if there were reports like that, maybe the thing was better prepared than I think. It wouldn't change much else of what I said though - it would have still been odd to chase FDJ only to bring in Casemiro instead. And the figures connected would still be favoring Real Madrid (at least I think that they favored Madrid).
Well it does change it, because all evidence points to the opposite of your argument.

“WHAT HE SAID: Asked whether he was surprised at Casemiro's decision: "Man, at first, yes. I found out well before they announced it. A few months before, we had already talked, me and him," Fred told TNT Sports Brazil.”


You keep saying clubs and players are saying lies to the media, but oddly don’t think the same might be the case with the rumours that we were chasing de jong as the only midfield target all summer? Why is that theory more realistic?
 
Ancelotti started when I told him I was set to leave Real Madrid”, Casemiro says.

“Everything was done with Man United, I decided to enter Carlo Ancelotti’s office… he started crying”.

“So he told me: ‘Case, I don’t know... ! ’ !”.

“It was the only moment where I doubted leaving Real Madrid. It was so difficult, also because the president Florentino Pérez didn’t even want to let me leave”.

“I wanted to try something new at Man United but I’m still supporting Real and I suffer during the games!”.

“I’ll always love Real Madrid, it’s part of my life”,

And….



Is Cas lying, or did Perez want him to stay?
It’s one or the other.
So now Ancelotti was crying as well. An emotional bunch apparently.

I still don't get why you double down on the lying part. When relationships end or when people leave companies, the public statements are often phrased positively because why not, it doesn't hurt anybody. You don't have to lie but you can focus on the good parts. Thats not lying. You are acting as if those quotes contradict what I said. Casemiro wanted to leave Real, whether he saw the opportunity to extend the time he receives a high salary, whether it was to be an indisputed starter again or whether it was about a new challenge. If you want to tell me you know for sure what it is, again, I can't do anything about it. Real was fine letting him go. Because if they wouldn't have been fine, they didn't have to let him go. Thats exactly what I said. Whether Perez wanted him to leave or not, isn't that important because at the end of the day, he left and Real got a very good amount of money for it. If you want to insist that Perez was really really sad about it, again, go for it.

We started about the question whether the deal was favorable for Real or not. I don't think those quotes do much about it. Mainly because of the facts that surround the case - they received a fee that was unlikely to be received from anybody else at the time. And they received it when they had already brought one player in, who could take over Casemiros role. I am trying, mate, tell me, how is that not a favorable deal for Real?
 
So now Ancelotti was crying as well. An emotional bunch apparently.

I still don't get why you double down on the lying part. When relationships end or when people leave companies, the public statements are often phrased positively because why not, it doesn't hurt anybody. You don't have to lie but you can focus on the good parts. Thats not lying. You are acting as if those quotes contradict what I said. Casemiro wanted to leave Real, whether he saw the opportunity to extend the time he receives a high salary, whether it was to be an indisputed starter again or whether it was about a new challenge. If you want to tell me you know for sure what it is, again, I can't do anything about it. Real was fine letting him go. Because if they wouldn't have been fine, they didn't have to let him go. Thats exactly what I said. Whether Perez wanted him to leave or not, isn't that important because at the end of the day, he left and Real got a very good amount of money for it. If you want to insist that Perez was really really sad about it, again, go for it.

We started about the question whether the deal was favorable for Real or not. I don't think those quotes do much about it. Mainly because of the facts that surround the case - they received a fee that was unlikely to be received from anybody else at the time. And they received it when they had already brought one player in, who could take over Casemiros role. I am trying, mate, tell me, how is that not a favorable deal for Real?

Because their team got worse when they didn't want it to
 
Well it does change it, because all evidence points to the opposite of your argument.
It points against the argument that the deal wasn't well prepared. I just said that I haven't heard about that Fred quote. If it is legit then the deal seemingly didn't come out of nowhere and that part of my take would be wrong. I don't see how that changes much about the numbers and replacements.
You keep saying clubs and players are saying lies to the media, but oddly don’t think the same might be the case with the rumours that we were chasing de jong as the only midfield target all summer? Why is that theory more realistic?
I explicitly said, I don't accuse anybody of lying. The rumours about FDJ lasted the whole summer. You are right, I don't know if they are true. But I'd say the general consensus on here was at the time, and until today I suppose, that we wanted to bring in FDJ. A passer type that worked with ETH before also made a pretty plausible case if you ask me. It is still a rumour, I'll happily give you that. But it doesn't mean that complimentary statements after a deal should be taken at face value. Let me rephrase it: I don't think such statements should be taken at face value. I don't think, thats reasonable. If you think that position is unreasonable, thats fair. I won't try to convince you.
 
Also 'emotional bunch ' we're talking about a 5 time champions league winning leader for your team who you don't want to go but wants a new challenge.

The only player in his position in his generation that was arguably as good (in a different way) was Busquets. We're talking generation defining legends of football..

Of course people were emotional
 
Last edited:
Because their team got worse when they didn't want it to
If they didn't want it to, why did they let him leave then? They could have asked him nicely to stick around a year longer, they could have insisted that he respects his contract.
I am not even try to undermine Casemiro here - when he left, Real lost experience and talent. But they still had experience in the team and they brought in talent in Tchouameni who obviously wasn't as established as Casemiro but still on his way up while the other was on his way down.

Real would have had the means to stop the transfer. But they didn't. And then went out and presented the deal as a mutual decision in the best interest of the player.
 
If they didn't want it to, why did they let him leave then? They could have asked him nicely to stick around a year longer, they could have insisted that he respects his contract.
I am not even try to undermine Casemiro here - when he left, Real lost experience and talent. But they still had experience in the team and they brought in talent in Tchouameni who obviously wasn't as established as Casemiro but still on his way up while the other was on his way down.

Real would have had the means to stop the transfer. But they didn't. And then went out and presented the deal as a mutual decision in the best interest of the player.

Because he wanted to leave and he earned the right to decide his own future.

Just like we let Bruno decide last summer.

Its called respect.
 
Also 'emotional bunch ' we're talking about a 5 time champions league winning leader for your team who you don't want to go but wants a new challenge.

The only player in his position in his generation that was arguably as good (in a different way) was Busquests. We're talking generation defining legends of football..

Of course people were emotional
Fair enough. I don't think Casemiro will be seen in that high regard within all the names that made that Real Madrid so special but I might be wrong here since I am not so deep into Casemiros relation with the fans.

Still struggle to think that Perez or Ancelotti were actually crying. Or is that some figure of speech I am not familiar with
 
Fair enough. I don't think Casemiro will be seen in that high regard within all the names that made that Real Madrid so special but I might be wrong here since I am not so deep into Casemiros relation with the fans.

Still struggle to think that Perez or Ancelotti were actually crying. Or is that some figure of speech I am not familiar with
Yeah I don’t think you’re aware how much of a legend of the game Casemiro is tbh.

I’d argue he’d still start most games for Madrid today if he went back
It points against the argument that the deal wasn't well prepared. I just said that I haven't heard about that Fred quote. If it is legit then the deal seemingly didn't come out of nowhere and that part of my take would be wrong. I don't see how that changes much about the numbers and replacements.

I explicitly said, I don't accuse anybody of lying. The rumours about FDJ lasted the whole summer. You are right, I don't know if they are true. But I'd say the general consensus on here was at the time, and until today I suppose, that we wanted to bring in FDJ. A passer type that worked with ETH before also made a pretty plausible case if you ask me. It is still a rumour, I'll happily give you that. But it doesn't mean that complimentary statements after a deal should be taken at face value. Let me rephrase it: I don't think such statements should be taken at face value. I don't think, thats reasonable. If you think that position is unreasonable, thats fair. I won't try to convince you.
sure, it’s reasonable.

So then, isn’t it also reasonable to think that:

- a 5 time CL winner who obviously loves the game, wanted another challenge at the top before he gets too old?

- Real Madrid didn’t want such an important, generational talent to leave just yet?

- that they let him leave regardless because they appreciate everything he’s done for their club and respect his wishes?
 
Yeah I don’t think you’re aware how much of a legend of the game Casemiro is tbh.

I’d argue he’d still start most games for Madrid today if he went back
I know that Madrid struggles with issues especially in the middle of the park. I think it is difficult though to put a certain extent of that on Casemiro. I know that neither Tchouameni nor Camavinga have really hit it off consistently so I have no issue to say that Madrid actually got worse when he left - but thats with the benefit of hindsight. At the time, both Frenchmen were fairly hot commodities and I was talking about the perception of the time.
sure, it’s reasonable.

So then, isn’t it also reasonable to think that:

- a 5 time CL winner who obviously loves the game, wanted another challenge at the top before he gets too old?

- Real Madrid didn’t want such an important, generational talent to leave just yet?

- that they let him leave regardless because they appreciate everything he’s done for their club and respect his wishes?
Thats all reasonable. I don't think I ever claimed it wouldn't be. I just base my standpoint on my memories of the time. And Casemiros star was starting to fade - at least from my perception. And Tchouamenis star was rising. Thats why I think that Real made a pretty good exchange back then. Would they have prefered to keep him longer, I guess so, even in our club we have elements that struggle to let go of the past. And thats without the success that Real had when he was around. At the end of the day though, they made the deal with us. A deal, that AT THE TIME seemed a pretty good one for Real - adding a young promising player in Tchouameni for big money and getting big money for the player the new one was supposed to take over from. Its as if today we'd bring in Hujsen for 65 million and then the Saudis come and offer us 55 million for Maguire. Obviously it isn't exactly the same but the general notion of such a deal would be positive for us.

Regardless of the details, I don't see how calling it a favorable deal for Real is something controversial.
 
You keep falling into the same trap again and again, it doesn’t matter how many times you post this but this here is your confirmation bias written down.
YOU simply cannot believe what they have said because YOU are convinced it was a great deal for them.

Do you think it would’ve been favourable for Madrid to have accepted a similar offer for Kroos at the same age? Or to have accepted a similar offer for Modrić at the same age?
Would it for example have been favourable for us to have sold Scholes at that age?
On the face of it you can't say that's not a favorable price for a player that age on high wages. Their attempts to replace him tell a different story however.
 
Him and Bruno are two biggest professionals in our squad by miles. 33 years old, all time great on his position, won shit load of trophies but he still plays every game fully focused.
 
Letting Ugarte leave, keeping Casemiro and buying 2 new CMs is a much better transition. Plus he still has a lot to offer when used sparingly
Yeah. This gets my vote. Like others have said, it would be nice if he agreed to a pay reduction. Hopefully, United will be playing more than 50-60 matches next season, and Casemiro will need games off. With 5 substitutions, it's less of a problem if he can't go 90 minutes in intense games like against City. And he is only 33. As an athlete ages, they lose pace, but not strength nor conditioning. Long-distance runners often peak from their late 20s into their 30s.

But! Casemiro, when the manager and coaching staff, have not left him isolated has generally been really good for United. He almost always knows where he is passing the ball next before he receives the pass. That is an awareness of the game, the pitch, and what is happening that not everyone at United has. He is a very intelligent footballer. He may not have lightening pace, but his positioning is excellent. Ten Hag, especially left him on an island running after speedy forwards and wingers on counterattacks. That was on Ten Hag more than Casemiro. I think that Casemiro could still have another 1-3 years of positive contributions to make.
 
On the face of it you can't say that's not a favorable price for a player that age on high wages.

Was reportedly on 180k /week at Madrid.

I wouldn’t have sold Scholes, Keane, Kroos, Robson, Modric, Bruno Fernandes, Frank Lampard at that age so I don’t really see this ”favourable” scenario unless you’re an accountant.
They lost one of their best players and leaders.
 
Was reportedly on 180k /week at Madrid.
Capology says the same. Sounds awfully low...

Has Casemiro at 182

Hazard 521
Bale 521
Marcelo 406
Kroos 406
Benzema 400
Alaba 375
Modric 364
Courtois 250

Fecking Lucas Vasquez on 156...

Could this be true? And why the feck did we increase it by 95% to 350 that he would be on if we had CL?!