Chelsea appoint Thomas Tuchel

Hammondo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
6,809
You guys have overrated your squad many times over the last years, but not this year. Sure your midfield isn't the best, but you have a mass of talent in there. A top manager would easily make them into a real threat.
I think we have very few players that would make any of the top 3 teams.
 

SirReginald

New Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
2,295
Supports
Chelsea
I think we have very few players that would make any of the top 3 teams.
You have good options in attack, poor options in midfield and an OK defense with 2 strong GKs.

The problem with your team is that you never truly fixed your defense, just patched it and completely ignored the middle. I know a top class manager can mitigate some weak areas but you don’t have a midfield that can dominate teams on a regular basis. You’ve lost on pressing, make a lot of errors and the chemistry is all wrong - None of those players can mitigate the others weakness.

Ole was right when he said you needed to go back and get the basics right, but he was so blind by ‘the United way’ and the ghost of fergie that he didn’t see that the basics were still not being followed.
 

Zehner

Football Statistics Dork
Joined
Mar 29, 2018
Messages
8,051
Location
Germany
Supports
Bayer 04 Leverkusen
I think we have very few players that would make any of the top 3 teams.
Sancho would walk into the Chelsea team. He's much better than Havertz and he is currently starting for Chelsea while Sancho barely featured for United. Many of your players would look totally different in a well functioning team. The quality is definitely there: Greenwood, Sancho, Rashford, Cristiano, Cavani, Bruno, van de Beek and Varane are top class players. Even Martial is incredibly talented.
 

stefan92

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2021
Messages
6,167
Supports
Hannover 96
Sancho would walk into the Chelsea team. He's much better than Havertz and he is currently starting for Chelsea while Sancho barely featured for United.
Sancho for sure is not better than Havertz in Havertz current position. Havertz currently starts up front, and that mainly because two forwards are injured (Lukaku, Werner). No 9 is a position Sancho has never played and is not suited to play.
 

Zehner

Football Statistics Dork
Joined
Mar 29, 2018
Messages
8,051
Location
Germany
Supports
Bayer 04 Leverkusen
Sancho for sure is not better than Havertz in Havertz current position. Havertz currently starts up front, and that mainly because two forwards are injured (Lukaku, Werner). No 9 is a position Sancho has never played and is not suited to play.
Yes but prior to that Havertz played as one of two tens in a 3-4-2-1 behind Werner/Lukaku, e. g. in the UCL final. That's pretty much the exact same position Sancho occupied in Favre's 3-4-2-1 when Hakimi was still there. His competitors for this position, if he was to play for Chelsea instead of Havertz, would be Mount, Ziyech and maybe Pulisic. You never fully know but I think everything points towards the assumption he'd be a clear starter.

I mean, let's not Sancho outperformed many proven world class attacking players in the Bundesliga over the last few years. Reus, Gnabry, Coman, Sané, Havertz, Werner, etc. were all quite clearly worse than him.
 

stefan92

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2021
Messages
6,167
Supports
Hannover 96
Yes but prior to that Havertz played as one of two tens in a 3-4-2-1 behind Werner/Lukaku, e. g. in the UCL final. That's pretty much the exact same position Sancho occupied in Favre's 3-4-2-1 when Hakimi was still there. His competitors for this position, if he was to play for Chelsea instead of Havertz, would be Mount, Ziyech and maybe Pulisic. You never fully know but I think everything points towards the assumption he'd be a clear starter.

I mean, let's not Sancho outperformed many proven world class attacking players in the Bundesliga over the last few years. Reus, Gnabry, Coman, Sané, Havertz, Werner, etc. were all quite clearly worse than him.
I'll give you that we can be sure he would be ahead of Pulisic, as actually that situation existed at Dortmund. He would definitely be in the mix there, but it is a plus for Havertz that he is more versatile then Sancho.
 

Kentonio

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
13,188
Location
Stamford Bridge
Supports
Chelsea
We don't have an 11 that always start, but Sancho would most definitely be one of our main starting choices. I'd love him at Chelsea. I'd have loved Varane too, was gutted when Utd got him.

Shaw's class, Pogba (much as I dislike his arrogance) is class, Bruno is great, Ronaldo is obviously great despite his age. There's some serious quality in that Utd team which is just being criminally underused.
 

Dave Smith

Full Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2019
Messages
2,509
Supports
Anything anti-Dipper
Sancho would probably get into the Chelsea team and so would CR7, however on current form I am not sure how many other Utd players would get into a combo side? Certainly not any of the WB's, CM's or CB's.
 

Zehner

Football Statistics Dork
Joined
Mar 29, 2018
Messages
8,051
Location
Germany
Supports
Bayer 04 Leverkusen
Sancho would probably get into the Chelsea team and so would CR7, however on current form I am not sure how many other Utd players would get into a combo side? Certainly not any of the WB's, CM's or CB's.
I'd say Varane, too. Bruno could also make it as a CM or AM, same for De Gea. Possibly Shaw, too. There aren't that many positions in which Chelsea is clearly better. CB, CDM and RB.
 

Rajiztar

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2019
Messages
2,102
Supports
Chelsea
Sancho would walk into the Chelsea team. He's much better than Havertz and he is currently starting for Chelsea while Sancho barely featured for United. Many of your players would look totally different in a well functioning team. The quality is definitely there: Greenwood, Sancho, Rashford, Cristiano, Cavani, Bruno, van de Beek and Varane are top class players. Even Martial is incredibly talented.
Sancho won t start for Chelsea if his work rate is that low for sure. He is no better than ziyech in my opinion. Yes he will in future but whatever I watched in United shirt nothing to suggest he will replace Hudson odoi at present let alone havertz mount ziyech pulisic and all.
 

Kentonio

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
13,188
Location
Stamford Bridge
Supports
Chelsea
I'd say Varane, too. Bruno could also make it as a CM or AM, same for De Gea. Possibly Shaw, too. There aren't that many positions in which Chelsea is clearly better. CB, CDM and RB.
De Gea certainly wouldn't, Mendy has been close to perfect this season. Shaw would have to compete with both Chilwell and Alonso, so possible but far from certain. Bruno is a good shout, and possibly Pogba as we have Kante there to offset his disadvantages. Then again we have some really, really good CMs ourselves, so it's definitely not clear cut. The fact it's up for debate at all though shows there's some real class there.
 

Kentonio

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
13,188
Location
Stamford Bridge
Supports
Chelsea
Sancho won t start for Chelsea if his work rate is that low for sure. He is no better than ziyech in my opinion. Yes he will in future but whatever I watched in United shirt nothing to suggest he will replace Hudson odoi at present let alone havertz mount ziyech pulisic and all.
Can't judge the lad on the shitshow he's been dropped into since his move. He's quality.
 

Orc

Pretended to be a United fan for two years
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
5,322
Supports
Chelsea
I'd say Varane, too. Bruno could also make it as a CM or AM, same for De Gea. Possibly Shaw, too. There aren't that many positions in which Chelsea is clearly better. CB, CDM and RB.
Varane isn’t better than Thiago Silva or Rüdiger and on form over the last few months since Tuchel came in Christensen has been top class as well. Not sure Varane would go right in. I’m definitely not having Shaw in place of Chilly. Chilwell is much more adept going forward in our system.

The only player from United I’d instantly take in our XI is Bruno. And even then only against smaller teams where he wouldn't have to press high like Mount does.
 

Klopper76

"Did you see Fabinho against Red Star & Cardiff?"
Joined
Dec 15, 2015
Messages
19,809
Location
Victoria, BC
Supports
Liverpool
12 games in, 4 goals conceded. He’s got them set up in such a way that they’ll probably concede less than 20 goals all season.
 

Rajiztar

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2019
Messages
2,102
Supports
Chelsea
Can't judge the lad on the shitshow he's been dropped into since his move. He's quality.
No offense to bundesliga I just hate the stats from it. I can see why people rate sancho but certainly I didn't see anything of note yet from him. I didn't see him play for Dortmund admittedly. So probably you are right.
 

Rajiztar

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2019
Messages
2,102
Supports
Chelsea
12 games in, 4 goals conceded. He’s got them set up in such a way that they’ll probably concede less than 20 goals all season.
We certainly not water tight like last season. Mendy s top form more than anything in my opinion.
 

imanshole

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 21, 2018
Messages
19
Supports
Chelsea Fc
As usual united fans overrating their players, the same way you did with Ole after he won games against Pep and Klopp, like he was the 2nd coming of SAF.

Shaw won't get ahead of Chilwell or Alonso, Sancho is nowhere his Dortmund form and he is like any other prospect from the german league. Rashford and Greenwood are just speed merchants who go missing when needed in important matches unlike Havertz and Mount. And our midfield trio of Kovacic, Jorginho and Kante are only second to City's midfield if even. Mendy has achieved more than DDG has in his whole career inside a year. He is breaking records left and right and is more comparable to Petr. Rudiger, Christensen and Silva are far better than what you have to offer ever since SAF retired.
 

Kentonio

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
13,188
Location
Stamford Bridge
Supports
Chelsea
As usual united fans overrating their players, the same way you did with Ole after he won games against Pep and Klopp, like he was the 2nd coming of SAF.

Shaw won't get ahead of Chilwell or Alonso, Sancho is nowhere his Dortmund form and he is like any other prospect from the german league. Rashford and Greenwood are just speed merchants who go missing when needed in important matches unlike Havertz and Mount. And our midfield trio of Kovacic, Jorginho and Kante are only second to City's midfield if even. Mendy has achieved more than DDG has in his whole career inside a year. He is breaking records left and right and is more comparable to Petr. Rudiger, Christensen and Silva are far better than what you have to offer ever since SAF retired.
It would be a bad mistake to underestimate this United team. They're nowhere near as well coached as our lads, but they're far stronger as individuals than United have had in a long time.
 

Dominos

Full Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
7,000
Location
Manchester
As usual united fans overrating their players, the same way you did with Ole after he won games against Pep and Klopp, like he was the 2nd coming of SAF.

Shaw won't get ahead of Chilwell or Alonso, Sancho is nowhere his Dortmund form and he is like any other prospect from the german league. Rashford and Greenwood are just speed merchants who go missing when needed in important matches unlike Havertz and Mount. And our midfield trio of Kovacic, Jorginho and Kante are only second to City's midfield if even. Mendy has achieved more than DDG has in his whole career inside a year. He is breaking records left and right and is more comparable to Petr. Rudiger, Christensen and Silva are far better than what you have to offer ever since SAF retired.
If we look at it like this... If Tuchel was appointed United manager at the start of 2021, and Chelsea still had Lampard, we'd be sat here asking how many Chelsea players could get into the United team. The fortunes of the 2 teams would be completely reversed, there's no way Lampard would have Chelsea anywhere near us if Tuchel was our manager, in the same way Ole wasn't capable of getting anywhere near Tuchel's Chelsea.

Chelsea obviously have a very good squad.

Another way we could view these player comparisons. Would Tuchel drop any of your defenders if he was handed Varane tomorrow? Maybe not, because they've earned their place and there's no point disrupting a unit that is already working very well. If you offered the likes of PSG, Madrid, Barca, Bayern, Juve, City the chance to have 1 centre back from Chelsea or United tomorrow - I suspect a lot of them would take Varane. Speculation of course. Likewise I think most of them are going to take Bruno over Mason Mount even if Tuchel for some reason wouldn't like Bruno at Chelsea.
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,322
Supports
Chelsea
If we look at it like this... If Tuchel was appointed United manager at the start of 2021, and Chelsea still had Lampard, we'd be sat here asking how many Chelsea players could get into the United team. The fortunes of the 2 teams would be completely reversed, there's no way Lampard would have Chelsea anywhere near us if Tuchel was our manager, in the same way Ole wasn't capable of getting anywhere near Tuchel's Chelsea.

Chelsea obviously have a very good squad.

Another way we could view these player comparisons. Would Tuchel drop any of your defenders if he was handed Varane tomorrow? Maybe not, because they've earned their place and there's no point disrupting a unit that is already working very well. If you offered the likes of PSG, Madrid, Barca, Bayern, Juve, City the chance to have 1 centre back from Chelsea or United tomorrow - I suspect a lot of them would take Varane. Speculation of course. Likewise I think most of them are going to take Bruno over Mason Mount even if Tuchel for some reason wouldn't like Bruno at Chelsea.
Good post.
 

Zaphod2319

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2020
Messages
4,209
Supports
Chelsea
Sancho was not better than Havertz in Bundesliga and has not been better in the PL. Silly argument that he could be. He has to show it.

De Gea over Mendy :lol:
 

MayosNoun

Full Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2020
Messages
3,512
Supports
Chelsea
Sancho was not better than Havertz in Bundesliga and has not been better in the PL. Silly argument that he could be. He has to show it.

De Gea over Mendy :lol:
Comparing squads is easy to do on paper but as most have stated, it’s the way the manager has them performing.

Mendy over De Gea every single day for me is such an easy decision.

Both James and Azpi over AWB.

Only Varane would get into the back 3 because he’s quick and he’s good. No chance would Maguire or Lindelof get near our defence.

Last season, Shaw would have. This season, Chilwell and Alonso have been far better than him.

Kante, Jorginho, Kovacic, Loftus-Cheek, Gilmour and even Saul I’d have before McFred and Matic.

So the entire goalkeeper to midfield I feel we are far superior.

Attacking midfield to Striker, Man Utd have better individuals and we have a better unit. Rashford, Ronaldo and Greenwood would not enjoy the work ethic required by Tuchel. We don’t have a midfielder who provides a significant goal threat the way Bruno or Pogba would but their teamwork and pressing is on another level.
 

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,402
Supports
Chelsea
If we look at it like this... If Tuchel was appointed United manager at the start of 2021, and Chelsea still had Lampard, we'd be sat here asking how many Chelsea players could get into the United team. The fortunes of the 2 teams would be completely reversed, there's no way Lampard would have Chelsea anywhere near us if Tuchel was our manager, in the same way Ole wasn't capable of getting anywhere near Tuchel's Chelsea.

Chelsea obviously have a very good squad.

Another way we could view these player comparisons. Would Tuchel drop any of your defenders if he was handed Varane tomorrow? Maybe not, because they've earned their place and there's no point disrupting a unit that is already working very well. If you offered the likes of PSG, Madrid, Barca, Bayern, Juve, City the chance to have 1 centre back from Chelsea or United tomorrow - I suspect a lot of them would take Varane. Speculation of course. Likewise I think most of them are going to take Bruno over Mason Mount even if Tuchel for some reason wouldn't like Bruno at Chelsea.
I think in a 'proper' system you'll likely see Fernandes dropped.
 

imanshole

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 21, 2018
Messages
19
Supports
Chelsea Fc
It would be a bad mistake to underestimate this United team. They're nowhere near as well coached as our lads, but they're far stronger as individuals than United have had in a long time.
Of Course they are better than what they used to have, but that doesn't mean they are far better players on paper or on field than ours, because of one or two occasions couple months ago. Sancho was good in Bundesliga, doesn't mean he will be good in EPL, he already showing that he won't cut it here, he might need a very talented coach to get the best out of him, but that could just be about 10-30% of what he did in the Bundesliga. As for Pogba, they are still calling him WC, even though he hasn't done jack shit since he arrived in england. The only moments of brilliance from him arrived playing with our own Kante in the french national team and those where max 20 games since 2016. Every player of theirs are being rated by them for what they maybe in few games last season or the season before have done, which haven't produced anything significant in any meaningful way in terms of trophies. That doesn't make them WC players, but they are still calling them that.
 

Dominos

Full Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
7,000
Location
Manchester
I think in a 'proper' system you'll likely see Fernandes dropped.
Or, you'll see a top player adapt to a system. One of the reasons you're seeing an individualistic player at United is we've only seen him play under a coach who doesn't have a clue what he's doing.
 

Demas

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
98
Supports
Chelsea
I think Fernandes will walk into Chelsea's team because midfield creativity (goals and assists) has been a big problem. The team's organization will deal with the misplaced passes and his goals and assists will more than make up for his shortcomings. Other than that, I can't really comment on any other positions. Comparing squads is not easy, as we can't really tell what managers will do, and it is even more tricky when one team is in good form and the other is not.
 

Hansi Fick

New Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2020
Messages
5,057
Supports
FC Bayern
Sancho was not better than Havertz in Bundesliga and has not been better in the PL. Silly argument that he could be. He has to show it.

De Gea over Mendy :lol:
Sancho was definitively better than Havertz in Bundesliga.
 

BridgeBanter

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
378
Supports
Chelsea
As usual united fans overrating their players, the same way you did with Ole after he won games against Pep and Klopp, like he was the 2nd coming of SAF.

Shaw won't get ahead of Chilwell or Alonso, Sancho is nowhere his Dortmund form and he is like any other prospect from the german league. Rashford and Greenwood are just speed merchants who go missing when needed in important matches unlike Havertz and Mount. And our midfield trio of Kovacic, Jorginho and Kante are only second to City's midfield if even. Mendy has achieved more than DDG has in his whole career inside a year. He is breaking records left and right and is more comparable to Petr. Rudiger, Christensen and Silva are far better than what you have to offer ever since SAF retired.
I’m sorry but this is nonsense.

I rate Havertz and really hope he improves his consistency to become a great player for us but the notion that he’s way ahead of Rashford is nonsense. Rashford has scored 20+ goals on more than two occasions and I’m pretty sure he would start for Chelsea more often than not under Tuchel.

Also Mendy is prob the best goalie in the world this calendar year but De Gea was prob the best in the world or at worst top 2-3 for about 3-5 years so Mendy will need to sustain this level for at least another season or two to say that he’s surpassed him. Mendy has been fortunate to work under a supremely elite world class manager. De Gea’s peak just coincided with a lot of mediocre United teams post SAF so context matters. Mind you if I’m picking a team today, I’m choosing Mendy 10000%.
 

Moby

Dick
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
51,356
Location
Barcelona, Catalunya
I think in a 'proper' system you'll likely see Fernandes dropped.
Utter nonsense. Bruno will get in as a #10 or in an advanced role in the final third in most teams. Play him instead of Havertz/Mount in the current Chelsea team and he'd rack goals and assists for fun.
 

jakko

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 15, 2021
Messages
565
Supports
Chelsea
Or, you'll see a top player adapt to a system. One of the reasons you're seeing an individualistic player at United is we've only seen him play under a coach who doesn't have a clue what he's doing.
The coach that doesn't have a clue what he's doing had Bruno playing well though, Signed in January won the fans player of the season 5 months later.
Followed by another good season and then a stinker of a Euros. Bit odd to blame a players performances purely down to a manager.
Hazard didn't exactly play under elite managers at Chelsea, he was still brilliant under all of them whoever was in charge.
 

Dominos

Full Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
7,000
Location
Manchester
The coach that doesn't have a clue what he's doing had Bruno playing well though, Signed in January won the fans player of the season 5 months later.
Followed by another good season and then a stinker of a Euros. Bit odd to blame a players performances purely down to a manager.
Hazard didn't exactly play under elite managers at Chelsea, he was still brilliant under all of them whoever was in charge.
I wasn't saying his performances were bad. Only that the idea that he couldn't play in a top manager's "system" is not a fair statement until we've actually seen him play under an elite manager's system.
 

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,402
Supports
Chelsea
Utter nonsense. Bruno will get in as a #10 or in an advanced role in the final third in most teams. Play him instead of Havertz/Mount in the current Chelsea team and he'd rack goals and assists for fun.
I wasn't saying his performances were bad. Only that the idea that he couldn't play in a top manager's "system" is not a fair statement until we've actually seen him play under an elite manager's system.
I remember the same was said for prime Mata for us and it was equally laughed at. The heroball type of players don't tend to win you league's, even the best one's (Gerrard).

Put it this way, under say Ten Hag is it beyond possibility that he may favour the system friendly Van De Beek? Especially in big games and beyond that, if a new manager decides to go 433 or 352 where would he fit in?

Also there's the elephant in the room that him and Ronaldo together simply don't work and there's only one winner if a manager needs sacrifice one for team balance.
 

Nickholas

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Messages
399
Supports
Chelsea
According to Newsnow, Mason Mount is very unhappy at not playing enough and his wages are to low for how good he is (not playing at all well atm) and Liverpoop are going to try to buy Pulisic as he isn't playing enough at Chelsea..
 

jakko

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 15, 2021
Messages
565
Supports
Chelsea
I wasn't saying his performances were bad. Only that the idea that he couldn't play in a top manager's "system" is not a fair statement until we've actually seen him play under an elite manager's system.
Ok yeah my bad, thats a fair point. I just find it amusing the same players that played well last season for Utd had nothing to do with Ole but as soon as those same players now are play poorly it's all down to Ole.
Surely it works both ways?. I actually do think Bruno has been playing poorly though.
 

Moby

Dick
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
51,356
Location
Barcelona, Catalunya
I remember the same was said for prime Mata for us and it was equally laughed at.
By who? You?
The heroball type of players don't tend to win you league's, even the best one's (Gerrard).
Michael Laudrup, the poster boy for playing hollywood through balls won 4 La Ligas under the greatest exponent of total football - Johan Cruyff, in the same team that had Pep Guardiola. I could give countless examples but it is pointless over here.
Put it this way, under say Ten Hag is it beyond possibility that he may favour the system friendly Van De Beek?
He will play both.
Especially in big games and beyond that, if a new manager decides to go 433 or 352 where would he fit in?
left/right in the front three in 433 and AM in 352.
Also there's the elephant in the room that him and Ronaldo together simply don't work and there's only one winner if a manager needs sacrifice one for team balance.
More baseless crap.

That post kept on getting more shambolic with every line.
 

Dominos

Full Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
7,000
Location
Manchester
Also there's the elephant in the room that him and Ronaldo together simply don't work and there's only one winner if a manager needs sacrifice one for team balance.
Bruno and Ronaldo have combined for several goals this season already despite the whole team being an absolute shambles, their link up is literally the only positive thing about the season so far.

Again, judging players on a couple of months under a completely inept manager where the players have basically stopped playing for him. We could have slated a lot of Chelsea players last season under Lampard.
 

Sviken

New Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2021
Messages
2,450
Hazard didn't exactly play under elite managers at Chelsea, he was still brilliant under all of them whoever was in charge.
And Bruno hasn't? He's single-handedly carried this team for the past 2 years dragging it to top 4 twice and even finishing 2nd. Bruno has his faults, faults that under a top manager would be quickly rectified, but let's not pretend Hazard was at the top of his game all of the time. He had some spells that he was absolutely unplayable, especially under Mourinho and Conte, but at the same time he had spells were he was completely anonymous. Bruno has been absolute shit this season, but even in his shit form he has basically scrounged us a number of points, both in the CL and PL.

You guys seriously believe that you'd challenge for the league if Ole was in charge of your club? Or even play good football? Not long ago you were talking about a full rebuild, then you hired a great manager and went on to win the CL and are title favorites without much change to your squad. Even if we pretend Chelsea are somehow a better team than us, you're not that much better in terms of quality. We should still be right there on top of you if we had a similar calibre of manager at the helm. Liverpool are the same. Who can argue here that a midfield of Fabinho-Henderson-Oxlade Chamberlain is championship material? On paper it's the same dross as ours, yet Klopp has them performing while Ole can't. It's that simple.
 

BlueHaze

New Member
Joined
May 20, 2018
Messages
4,453
I will wait and see how this turns out in the long run but as for now he has greatly surprised me. I never thought he would come in and turn things around so quickly for them. Certainly a top quality manager.