I'm sure to a club spending a billion, that is a real deterrent. A further £52m fine is conditional. What an absolute joke by UEFA. The deterrent to clubs spending to win, is to fine them and not a competition ban? Yeah makes sense.
Chelsea fined £27m by UEFA.
- Thread starter Devil_forever
- Start date
-
Nik (@Rood), Jamie (@Vault Dweller) and Ed (@That'sHernandez) give their end of season awards out! They celebrate the best players, goals and moments of the season (there were some, honestly) and also give out awards for the worst and most disappointing players/moments of the season.
They then discuss all the latest transfer rumours and get into the potential ins and outs this summer at Old Trafford.
They gave up on that after City basically tore them apart in court
They will get more than £27m from the club world cup prize money alone!
What a futile gesture!
What a futile gesture!
I might be wrong but I think we pay the £27m and then we have a four year period with which to get back in line. If we don’t then we pay a much higher penalty £70mish.
It makes assumptions about the next set of accounts and seems we won’t get another penalty other than the higher fine unless i’m mistaken.
Edit: The four year period has annual targets to hit for a gradual return to compliance, miss those and there will indeed be additional penalties
It makes assumptions about the next set of accounts and seems we won’t get another penalty other than the higher fine unless i’m mistaken.
Edit: The four year period has annual targets to hit for a gradual return to compliance, miss those and there will indeed be additional penalties
Damn they won't be able to sign some random 19 year old called Mamadou Sarr and loan him to Strasbourg this summer 
Last edited:
4 years? UEFA sure do know how to look pathetic and spineless.
Oh no they'll have to settle for signing 17 players this window instead of 18
Was this £27m anything to do with conditional fines from last time or is it completely fresh?
https://www.skysports.com/football/...m-europe-for-23-24-in-separate-financial-case
Different, the previous was for accounting anomalies (paying agents off the books) under Roman. The new owners found it when they came in and self reported it
What was it for?