evil_geko
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2005
- Messages
- 6,389
Ffs.The boy did more in his short time on the pitch than Hojilund has this season, in terms of hold up play and bringing his fellow attackers into play

Ffs.The boy did more in his short time on the pitch than Hojilund has this season, in terms of hold up play and bringing his fellow attackers into play
He linked up more successfully than Hojlund did today. Which is an improvement
Scary isn’t itUnsurprisingly, he didn't look ready for this level.
Unfortunately, he still looked better than Hojlund.
Unsurprisingly, he didn't look ready for this level.
Unfortunately, he still looked better than Hojlund.
Thats one hell of a statement.Unsurprisingly, he didn't look ready for this level.
Unfortunately, he still looked better than Hojlund.
Rasmus is still grazing in a fieldChido is raw, but Rasmus is still in the freezer.
Rasmus is still grazing in a field
He doesn't try to wrestle defenders though, he's smart enough to take a step or two forward to get on the ball instead of backing into them. More than his technique it's this that hinders Hojlund.I have watched a fair bit of him in the 'unders' and it's clear he's nowhere near ready for the PL.
At 'unders' level he gets away with so much because he's twice the size of most of the CBs he's facing. We will quickly see, once he's up against PL CBs, that his touch / hold-up play are currently miles off even Hojlund (who's touch and hold up play are virtually non-existant at the moment).
I have watched a fair bit of him in the 'unders' and it's clear he's nowhere near ready for the PL.
At 'unders' level he gets away with so much because he's twice the size of most of the CBs he's facing. We will quickly see, once he's up against PL CBs, that his touch / hold-up play are currently miles off even Hojlund (who's touch and hold up play are virtually non-existant at the moment).
I have watched a fair bit of him in the 'unders' and it's clear he's nowhere near ready for the PL.
At 'unders' level he gets away with so much because he's twice the size of most of the CBs he's facing. We will quickly see, once he's up against PL CBs, that his touch / hold-up play are currently miles off even Hojlund (who's touch and hold up play are virtually non-existant at the moment).
I haven't really seen him, but was surprised to hear he's come into the first team straight from the u18s rather than u21s. Two big gaps he's suddenly just jumped up
There's certainly a lot of 20-24 year olds that, for one reason or another; have gone that you feel could easily still be in this squad - Kovar, Laird, Mengi, Kambwala, Fernandes, Oyedele, Hannibal, Pellistri, Garner, Elanga, Greenwood.As a club and as a fan base something odd has happened. We've skipped a generation of youth players.
The 20 year olds have almost been forgotten about and we've gone direct to the 17/18 year olds.
Really silly in my opinion.
Is it really silly though? It's what the club has always done. Who is the last player to have played a substantial amount of u21s to make it into the 1st team? You have to go a long way back. The most common path has been - dominate U18s>very few U21s>1st team debut.As a club and as a fan base something odd has happened. We've skipped a generation of youth players.
The 20 year olds have almost been forgotten about and we've gone direct to the 17/18 year olds.
Really silly in my opinion.
There's certainly a lot of 20-24 year olds that, for one reason or another; have gone that you feel could easily still be in this squad - Kovar, Laird, Mengi, Kambwala, Fernandes, Oyedele, Hannibal, Pellistri, Garner, Elanga, Greenwood.
We've lost a decent generation of potential squad players there, with just Garnacho (and Collyer if you count him as our youth player) in that 20-24 group in the current squad.
Though of the current 19/20 year olds still at the club, not many leap out as being better or with a higher ceiling than many of the promising 16-18 year olds. Gore, but for his injuries, could have had a chance. And I've felt Ethan Williams should be closer to consideration than he seems. But I can also see why many aren't deemed close to PL level and why the more promising teenagers below that age group are being looked at instead.
In Obi's case, in the attacking department, I can see why the 19-21 year old strikers like Wheatley, Hugill, McNeill have been loaned out or released (and are struggling in the EFL). And why younger strikers like Obi and Biancheri might get any opportunities instead.
Is it really silly though? It's what the club has always done. Who is the last player to have played a substantial amount of u21s to make it into the 1st team? You have to go a long way back. The most common path has been - dominate U18s>very few U21s>1st team debut.
Fair points, yeah. There's certainly a long way to go from impressing at U18 level to proving yourself first team standard.That might be the thinking, that the 17/18 year olds are just better.
But I'm not so sure. I don’t think any of them stand out as yet as nailed on. None of them have done anything at U21 level yet.
I didn't understand Hugill going back out on loan when we only really have one No.9 and he's struggling. Right now I think Hugill would be a better option that Obi.
When Gore is fit again, why send him back to Rotherham? By the time he's fit and back in the fold with them he'll probably get a handful of games. Meanwhile we have one CM who can run. He's 20, get him in the squad.
When people say "play the kids" they're forgetting about the 20 year olds. They're the kids.
Obi, Moorhouse etc are toddlers.
Fair points, yeah. There's certainly a long way to go from impressing at U18 level to proving yourself first team standard.
There's only one year age difference between Gore and Moorhouse though, so wouldn't class Moorhouse as a toddler if Gore's ready for first team consideration (as you suggest) when back from injury.
It's a shame Gore's had such a wasted 12-15 months injury wise. Had he had his EFL loan(s) as intended, we'd have a much better idea by now about how close he really is. Certainly had good potential before all his injury issues.
Ha, an apt description!Rasmus is still grazing in a field
People forget, he's only recently turned 17, he's not 18 until November. He's tall but lanky, and hasn't filled out his frame.I haven't really seen him, but was surprised to hear he's come into the first team straight from the u18s rather than u21s. Two big gaps he's suddenly just jumped up
This is something ive noticed myself and one of the issues that I think has affected us as a club even going back past the generation you mentioned to the Evans and company days. I never like to comment based on hindsight but it’s clear in this case.There's certainly a lot of 20-24 year olds that, for one reason or another; have gone that you feel could easily still be in this squad - Kovar, Laird, Mengi, Kambwala, Fernandes, Oyedele, Hannibal, Pellistri, Garner, Elanga, Greenwood.
We've lost a decent generation of potential squad players there, with just Garnacho (and Collyer if you count him as our youth player) in that 20-24 group in the current squad.
Though of the current 19/20 year olds still at the club, not many leap out as being better or with a higher ceiling than many of the promising 16-18 year olds. Gore, but for his injuries, could have had a chance. And I've felt Ethan Williams should be closer to consideration than he seems. But I can also see why many aren't deemed close to PL level and why the more promising teenagers below that age group are being looked at instead.
In Obi's case, in the attacking department, I can see why the 19-21 year old strikers like Wheatley, Hugill, McNeill have been loaned out or released (and are struggling in the EFL). And why younger strikers like Obi and Biancheri might get any opportunities instead.