elmo
Can never have too many Eevees
Underperformed his XG while playing in the conference league. That isn’t a good sign.Yeah not bad at all - better than I expected. Underperformed his XG whilst most of the others over performed theirs.
Underperformed his XG while playing in the conference league. That isn’t a good sign.Yeah not bad at all - better than I expected. Underperformed his XG whilst most of the others over performed theirs.
Think those updated stats were PL only, in fairnessUnderperformed his XG while playing in the conference league. That isn’t a good sign.
Likely because they'd have to agree to that clause
Said it in anothet thread, but I think Jackson would be a decent option. Not sure if they will sell, but it would be typical Chelsea. Anyway, great underlying stats two seasons in a row. 24 years old. Great physique. Relentless pressing.
Nkunku would, regardless of price, be horrible.
Nah he’s just terrible. The sort of striker that misses 4 open nets gets a red card then scores in his 5th game after going 4 without a goal
He’s been comically bad almost every time I’ve seen him and since this is the Nkunku thread we should be going nowhere near him either
He has so few minutes that you can't really do this kind of comparison. In 23/24 for example he had less than 5 sets of 90 minutes, so each individual GA represents a whopping 0.20. When you're dealing with a range where the difference between top and bottom is little more than that, it makes the result untrustworthy. One more GA, he's at the very top of that list, one fewer GA he's at the very bottom. This is why you'd normally have a minimum game cut off when doing this kind of comparison.Same stats, PL only:
Non-penalty goal involvements per 90:
Cunha - 0.73
Amad - 0.66
Nkunku (23/24) - 0.61
Mbeumo - 0.58
Nkunku (24/25) - 0.49
Bruno - 0.45
Non-penalty expected goal involvements per 90:
Nkunku (24/25) - 0.68
Cunha - 0.57
Nkunku (23/24) - 0.51
Bruno - 0.48
Amad - 0.45
Mbeumo - 0.42
Point still stands. When he's been on the pitch, he's been productive. If someone (hopefully not us) takes the punt on him, it could well work out if they can keep him fit and playing.
Jackson is shite!Said it in anothet thread, but I think Jackson would be a decent option. Not sure if they will sell, but it would be typical Chelsea. Anyway, great underlying stats two seasons in a row. 24 years old. Great physique. Relentless pressing.
Nkunku would, regardless of price, be horrible.
Said it in anothet thread, but I think Jackson would be a decent option. Not sure if they will sell, but it would be typical Chelsea. Anyway, great underlying stats two seasons in a row. 24 years old. Great physique. Relentless pressing.
Nkunku would, regardless of price, be horrible.
To be fair he was sensational in Germany. Injuries have had a major impact on him in EnglandRemember how high people were rating him and thinking Chelsea are getting a good deal before he signed for them? Never trust the caf’s opinion on players.
why should we keep financing Chelsea's run by buying their rejects?I think all 3 - Madueke, Jackson and Nkunku will be good at the right price. Nkunku has to be a loan because injury risk but the other two we can pay money for.
Sancho was sensational in Germany and proved to be decidedly underwhelming in the premier league. Don’t need another!To be fair he was sensational in Germany. Injuries have had a major impact on him in England
Kagawa and Mkhitaryan as well for us. Werner for Chelsea. Probably a few more high profile ones to throw in thereSancho was sensational in Germany and proved to be decidedly underwhelming in the premier league. Don’t need another!
Football moves in cycles, but at the moment, the Premier League is miles ahead of any other major league, especially in terms of strength in depth down the league. Physically it’s really tough; you need to be a brilliant athlete as well technically sound. Seen a lot of players recently, Sancho and Antony being good examples, that just haven’t got the pace or strength required.Kagawa and Mkhitaryan as well for us. Werner for Chelsea. Probably a few more high profile ones to throw in there
Not into Jackson at all, he misses so many easy chances from what I've seen of him...we've already had players doing exactly that and it has really hurt us, often changing the momentum of the game.Said it in anothet thread, but I think Jackson would be a decent option. Not sure if they will sell, but it would be typical Chelsea. Anyway, great underlying stats two seasons in a row. 24 years old. Great physique. Relentless pressing.
Nkunku would, regardless of price, be horrible.
Our best players (Bruno, Amad, Yoro, De Ligt, Maz, etc.) were not Premier league proven. In the end it's about good scouting.Football moves in cycles, but at the moment, the Premier League is miles ahead of any other major league, especially in terms of strength in depth down the league. Physically it’s really tough; you need to be a brilliant athlete as well technically sound. Seen a lot of players recently, Sancho and Antony being good examples, that just haven’t got the pace or strength required.
It’s why I’m on board with signing proven premier league players as we’ve had way too many recent signings not be able to hack it, and I don’t want us taking punts on players that give off the “can’t hack it vibes” either. Let Nkunku go back to Germany or wherever.
Not into Jackson at all, he misses so many easy chances from what I've seen of him...we've already had players doing exactly that and it has really hurt us, often changing the momentum of the game.
We are not near good enough just now to present someone like Jackson with 4 or 5 chances in a game to get a goal, would be too big a gamble despite some of his better attributes.
Looked quality in Germany and initially at Chelsea. I think the combination of injuries and the manager not fancying him basically meant he couldn’t be arsed this season - which isn’t a great thing mentality wise.
Still for the right price or on a loan, he wouldn’t be a bad option, could slot into the 9 or 10 roles and do a job. If he recovered his form and fitness could be a bargain for someone.
De Bruyne?Sancho.
Remember how high people were rating him and thinking Chelsea are getting a good deal before he signed for them? Never trust the caf’s opinion on players.
Sure, but it's not a major argument to base your point on. There are more failures than successes from Germany to England.De Bruyne?
That's very debatable. Point being it's hard to judge based on individual transfersSure, but it's not a major argument to base your point on. There are more failures than successes from Germany to England.
Always a gamble signing from abroad, but if he’s shown himself not up to it at one premier league club, no reason to suggest he’d be up to it at another.That's very debatable. Point being it's hard to judge based on individual transfers
Yep, fair point and good shoutAlways a gamble signing from abroad, but if he’s shown himself not up to it at one premier league club, no reason to suggest he’d be up to it at another.
Could see him at Bayern now Musiala is knacked for the season.
Kagawa, Mkhitaryan, Werner and Havertz of the top of my head. Anyways, do not want Nkunku, specially after his injury and last season for Chelsea. Stinks of Mount all over again.De Bruyne?
Yeah avoid him at all costsKagawa, Mkhitaryan, Werner and Havertz of the top of my head. Anyways, do not want Nkunku, specially after his injury and last season for Chelsea. Stinks of Mount all over again.
why should we keep financing Chelsea's run by buying their rejects?
So you’re telling me there’s hope that Wirtz turns into a bust as well? Yes!Kagawa and Mkhitaryan as well for us. Werner for Chelsea. Probably a few more high profile ones to throw in there
Because we really appreciate it!why should we keep financing Chelsea's run by buying their rejects?
Stocking up on Chelsea's castoffs? We could see what Sterling is up to while we're at it.I think all 3 - Madueke, Jackson and Nkunku will be good at the right price. Nkunku has to be a loan because injury risk but the other two we can pay money for.