I always find it strange how the media have these vendettas against some of these foreign players that come to the Prem.
Obviously he hasn't been amazing since coming to City, but theres a lot of factors to take into account... Their defence is absolutely terrible for one.
The way the media talk about him is completely out of order in my opinion. Joe Hart wasn't a perfect keeper by any means so lets not act like he was. Pellegrini dropped him for Caballero and Pantilimon at times and you only have to look at some of the goals he's let in for England.
I wonder if Pep didn't show the door to their English pal in favor of him, would there be as much resentment towards Bravo? I don't think so. The whole vendetta against Bravo stinks of obvious bias from Joe Hart's friends in the media. Calling him "woeful" is complete ignorance. He's been Barca's keeper for two years and won 2 consecutive Copa Americas.
They've been on his case from the get go. I remember his debut against United, the commentators were practically waiting for him to make a mistake so they could run with the whole "Why sell Hart for this guy?" story. In that game, Stones was completely at fault for one of Bravo's "errors" and they put the entire thing on Bravo. Completely ignoring Stones' lack of surroundings/defensive awareness and this is a player that cost 50m!.. but he's English and probably friends with some of those pundits, so we'll let it slide...