DomesticTadpole
Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
That would be a dick move.


That would be a dick move.

Why would you like the debt removed?I am not yet INEOS out..
They have made many mistakes, Ten Hag, Ashworth but they have also come out and owned up to those mistakes.
People underestimate the amount of negligence that was at our club and mis management previously.
Fans will also point out failed signings such as Ugarte and Zirkzee but I dont think I have seen 1 football club that gets 100% signings success.
I would however like the debt removed, better infrastructure and long term planning.

Sammy SnakeTHAT bouncy castle?
They will never say it out loud and Ineos will try to avoid Woodward's Ole pitfalls but both parties will be hoping that Carrick goes well and they just kick on with him. Saves them a lot of trouble and if he could achieve something meaningful without summer additions then it makes the whole rebuild easier. If he finishes in the top 6, I think they will keep him.So are you saying we will ignore available opportunities like those two that you mentioned then
That episode was hilarious.Sammy Snake
Can we not disguise it?That episode was hilarious.
Can we not disguise it?
Yeah, we'll put a hat on it and say it's you

Cause it costs the club £50M per annum indefinitely.Why would you like the debt removed?
Well that's utterly ridiculous, I could understand it IF none of Alonso, Tuchel, Ancelotti heck even De Zerbi or Iraola weren't obtainable but they areThey will never say it out loud and Ineos will try to avoid Woodward's Ole pitfalls but both parties will be hoping that Carrick goes well and they just kick on with him. Saves them a lot of trouble and if he could achieve something meaningful without summer additions then it makes the whole rebuild easier. If he finishes in the top 6, I think they will keep him.
Alonso will go to Liverpool, Tuchel rejected us once before and Ancelotti might not want such a challenge at this stage of his career. De Zerbi isn't a sure thing and Iraola isn't performing well this season.Well that's utterly ridiculous, I could understand it IF none of Alonso, Tuchel, Ancelotti heck even De Zerbi or Iraola weren't obtainable but they are
Feck sake does nothing about how this club is being run into the ground not really make your blood boil. Absolutely stinks these so called owners just taking the cheap easy way out instead of you know appointing someone elite.Alonso will go to Liverpool, Tuchel rejected us once before and Ancelotti might not want such a challenge at this stage of his career. De Zerbi isn't a sure thing and Iraola isn't performing well this season.
Ineos are conducting a staged build, due to performances we might not even have £100m to spend before sales and we have already dipped into next summer's budget to buy Sesko. A young, marliable coach who won't cause a huge scene if he doesn't get enough reinforcements would be a dream. So rest assured; if he does well, they will keep him.
An elite manager wouldn't accept having to rely on Shaw, Dalot, Mount and the midfield we currently have. Granted, we will look to go big on the midfield in the summer but someone like Enrique or even Tuchel will also demand a new CB, LB and LW. Ineos, like the Glazers before them, won't be able to sell off the latest bomb squad and will hide behind PSR.Feck sake does nothing about how this club is being run into the ground not really make your blood boil. Absolutely stinks these so called owners just taking the cheap easy way out instead of you know appointing someone elite.
I’m not into vilifying billionaires ‘just because’.Yeah there's not really many good options when it comes to multi billionaires unfortunately.
Exactly this. It's nonsense. None of the people with power at the club are beholden to listen to whatever Sir Alex says. They even cut his pay FFS.Real brought in Arbeloa straight away and have repeatedly hired Capello, Del Bosque and Zidane.
Arsenal have Arteta in charge and had Edu as their DOF, Bayern have always had countless ex players very vocal or work for the club.
It is normal but because it feeds hysteria the media run dumb narratives. We constantly see narratives spun about United by media and fans that are not said about other clubs despite them operating that same way, whether it be hiring interim coaches, sacking coaches, having a DOF run the point on the style of play, backing managers in the transfer market, how much time a manager should get, clinging to the past, the list is endless where the narrative around us differs from the narrative about other clubs.
They are capitalising on a fanbase who are pretty clueless because we had the protective blanket of Sir Alex Ferguson.
Ole didn't get the job because he was thinking about it potentially leading to something long term so I don't know...I think they'll let Carrick have the full-time job if they think he's the right man to take the team forward in the long run whether he gets the team into the Champions League or not. If he was an interim appointment, then no matter his performance for the rest of the season, he would have moved on. Whilst keeping him as a full-time head coach until the summer gives the club more flexibillity in getting a more desirable head coach, if Carrick does well enough and impresses the leadership, then he can stay on even if Maresca, Xabi Alonso, and other better head coaching possilbilities are not just available but open to working for United.
Financially, it would make more sense for Berrada and Wilcox to use existing coaches to form the backroom staff instead of hiring new coaches in Woodgate, Holland, and Evans. Even if the existing staff wouldn't have been fully compatible with Carrick, they'd allow Carrick to implement his system and facilitate his coaching.
Well that's utterly ridiculous, I could understand it IF none of Alonso, Tuchel, Ancelotti heck even De Zerbi or Iraola weren't obtainable but they are
Why would you like the debt removed?
If Carrick gets us into top 4, they wont have the balls to sack him. Just like they didnt sack Ten Hag after the cup win, and Amorim after his disastrous first season.
You can have Enrique or Tuchel available, but they wont make the difficult choice. They will keep him and sack him in November after a run of bad form when its easy, and throw another season down the toilet.
There won't be any need to sack him as his contract will be up on 30.06.2026.If Carrick gets us into top 4, they wont have the balls to sack him. Just like they didnt sack Ten Hag after the cup win, and Amorim after his disastrous first season.
You can have Enrique or Tuchel available, but they wont make the difficult choice. They will keep him and sack him in November after a run of bad form when its easy, and throw another season down the toilet.
They wouldn't sack him. They would just not give him a new contract. Different situation to previous two seasons.If Carrick gets us into top 4, they wont have the balls to sack him. Just like they didnt sack Ten Hag after the cup win, and Amorim after his disastrous first season.
You can have Enrique or Tuchel available, but they wont make the difficult choice. They will keep him and sack him in November after a run of bad form when its easy, and throw another season down the toilet.
Why would you not want the club with less debt?Why would you like the debt removed?
If he gets us to top 4, there will be pressure on them to make him permanent, just like there was with Ole. Do you remember how they folded and gave Ten Hag an extension when there was no need to?They wouldn't sack him. They would just not give him a new contract. Different situation to previous two seasons.
Personally, I don't think he should be anywhere near the job by the end of May but if by some miracle, he gets us playing well with a consistent style of play, there would need to be a conversation.
Do you not find greedy billionaires destroying the club and making us a complete laughing stock to try and squeeze extra profit a red line?I’m not into vilifying billionaires ‘just because’.
But the state backed option means a ‘walk away’ from me, whilst another leveraged buyout is literally taking the piss out of any fan who puts cash into the club.
I find both pretty much proverbial red lines.
The amount of money that goes into football has corrupted the game big time. We’re at a time where it’s less of a sport, more of a wealth creation system, and the more the wealth is concentrated, the less value there is for the game and its fans.
It’s all a bit shit really, just a matter of personal perspective as to how much shit you’re prepared to ignore.
Everytime INEOS had to make the choice between whats right and easy, they have done whats easy
Yes. Its easy to fire no name everyday joes. Not so easy to fire a manager who just won a cup and a high severance package.So do you think it was easy to lay off staff and make cuts?
Do you think it was an easy decision to keep Amorim in the summer when alot wanted him out?
Think you’ve probably misinterpreted what I’m saying here mate.Do you not find greedy billionaires destroying the club and making us a complete laughing stock to try and squeeze extra profit a red line?
Yes. Its easy to fire no name everyday joes. Not so easy to fire a manager who just won a cup and a high severance package.
Yes again. Because they went all in for him, and sacking him in summer would be admitting that they fecked up.
And what 6 months later... it wont be admitting?
This is football... there is no guaranteed success, it seems you think there is.. so let me ask you.
What manager do you think we should get? Or will you avoid this question.
An elite manager wouldn't accept having to rely on Shaw, Dalot, Mount and the midfield we currently have. Granted, we will look to go big on the midfield in the summer but someone like Enrique or even Tuchel will also demand a new CB, LB and LW. Ineos, like the Glazers before them, won't be able to sell off the latest bomb squad and will hide behind PSR.
We have finally run out of road and I feel that Amorim and the poorly executed summer transfer window, mainly driven by trying to support Amorim, may have been one mistake too far. We could sell Bruno and get something for Hoijlund and Rashford but that won't be enough to fund the £300m plus summer window we will need to address issues in the team and also, selling Bruno could create another big issue.
So Carrick, McKenna or Iraola are the types of manager we will attract and they can be talked into accepting the staged rebuild but find themselves getting sacked in winter after the unreliable players they would have been talked into keeping, until they can be replaced 'next summer', predictably let them down. We are now stuck in a vicious cycle of mediocrity and it won't be long before we start flirting with relegation.
Again. I think it goes beyond top 4.If he gets us to top 4, there will be pressure on them to make him permanent, just like there was with Ole. Do you remember how they folded and gave Ten Hag an extension when there was no need to?
Yes technically we wont have to sack him, but they know if they bring in a new manager who underperforms after Carrick does well, they will be under immense pressure. So they will cover their ass
Everytime INEOS had to make the choice between whats right and easy, they have done whats easy
I don't get it, so the performance of the people in charge of football operations shouldn't be measured on football success? What should it be measured on?
INEOS haven't done everything wrong, but they have fumbled the three most important decisions since they got on board (ETH, Ashworth, Amorim). They aren't the main culprit of United's currently predicament (Glazers are), but they are the most recent ones and are at the wheel right now.
Enrique is in contract until 2027If Carrick gets us into top 4, they wont have the balls to sack him. Just like they didnt sack Ten Hag after the cup win, and Amorim after his disastrous first season.
You can have Enrique or Tuchel available, but they wont make the difficult choice. They will keep him and sack him in November after a run of bad form when its easy, and throw another season down the toilet.
He’s not getting top 6 let alone top 4 so we won’t need to worry about that, we will have 32/33 points from 23 PL matches with 15 left, to be in the mix for top 4 we would need 70-72 points for 5th maybe 67-69 depending on Chelsea and Newcastle.Alonso will go to Liverpool, Tuchel rejected us once before and Ancelotti might not want such a challenge at this stage of his career. De Zerbi isn't a sure thing and Iraola isn't performing well this season.
Ineos are conducting a staged build, due to performances we might not even have £100m to spend before sales and we have already dipped into next summer's budget to buy Sesko. A young, marliable coach who won't cause a huge scene if he doesn't get enough reinforcements would be a dream. So rest assured; if he does well, they will keep him.
I don't get it, so the performance of the people in charge of football operations shouldn't be measured on football success? What should it be measured on?
INEOS haven't done everything wrong, but they have fumbled the three most important decisions since they got on board (ETH, Ashworth, Amorim). They aren't the main culprit of United's currently predicament (Glazers are), but they are the most recent ones and are at the wheel right now.
Yeah it is. But they didnt have any options, Amorim was straight up calling war on them in press conferences.And what 6 months later... it wont be admitting?
This is football... there is no guaranteed success, it seems you think there is.. so let me ask you.
What manager do you think we should get? Or will you avoid this question.
Yeah it is. But they didnt have any options, Amorim was straight up calling war on them in press conferences.
I will gladly take any manager who has some experience managing big clubs. Tuchel, Enrique, Alonso, De Zerbi are all decent choices(some more attainable ofcourse)