You need to cut him a break here. I think he has a really good point in that City don't have any way of servicing that wage bill and all our income is false.
I mean, it's not like we don't get £130m-£140m a year from the PL TV deal is it? Add to that the fact that we earned more in prize/TV money than any other club in Europe from last season's Champions League run - around £70m IIRC. Then there's the £50-odd million a year from match day/corporate ticket income. Not to mention the £12 million a year kit deal from Nike - a deal that is due to run out soon and will be up for tender with rumours that a far more lucrative deal will be signed with Under Armour. That's well over £250 million a year without me even trying and is before a single penny of commercial revenue is taken into account, much of which these days doesn't come from companies located in or near our owner's homeland as you pointed out.
So yes, it's easy to see where he's coming from. City are clearly an insolvent business worth no more than a quid because obviously Mr gregster knows of some secret clause where, if the sheikh sells the club, we'll be the only club in the whole of the football league that will lose all our TV income, all our prize money, all our sponsorship revenue, all our match day revenue, and all the money from our kit deal. We'll go from generating circa £400 million a year to generating the sum total of zero pounds and zero pence per annum pretty much overnight.
Yep, what he said makes perfect sense to me.