Rojofiam
Full Member
- Joined
- May 11, 2017
- Messages
- 5,853
If Palmer plays for Utd it'll be when he's washed up in his 30s. Similar to Leeds fans dreaming of Haaland playing for them because he supported them as a child, it'll only be likely in the twilight of his career.
Just because you liked Utd as a child doesn't mean it's a great idea to mix your professional career with the club you liked as a kid, it can ruin the fantasy and you may end up disliking the club after having to work there.
Not even remotely similar, though. United are a top 3 biggest club in the world and only need 1-2 years of half-decent leadership at the top, in order to compete for the biggest trophies again, with the likes of Madrid, City, and Arsenal.
Leeds are probably not even top 30, and Haaland wasn't even in kindergarten yet when they were last competitive at the top. There's also no way for them to reach that level again in the next 10-20 years, unless they're bought by a billionaire / nation state that gets their shit together like the Saudis did for Newcastle.
It's absolutely delusional to think Palmer playing for United at some point in the future is inconceivable and that we would be some sort of pre-retirement destination for him with no real sporting aspirations.
What you said in your post, is rathe closer to someone in 2009 claiming that Ronaldo shouldn't go to Real Madrid, because they weren't competitive at that time and haven't been a European superpower for several years back then. Except that United were a top 2 team in Europe at that point, and Chelsea are widely accepted to be a mess today, and nowhere near a top team. Or club.
You basically claim that it's as difficult for United to become a City/Madrid/Arsenal level side again, as it would be for Leeds? Or did I misunderstand?