Hugh Jass
Shave Dass
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2016
- Messages
- 11,292
During the roman empire.You still remember Euro 200?
I can’t even remember who won that one..
During the roman empire.You still remember Euro 200?
I can’t even remember who won that one..
North KoreaYou still remember Euro 200?
I can’t even remember who won that one..
Funnily enough of the 4 best signings juventus made in his era, he was against 2 of those(pirlo and tevez) and neutral to the other 2(vidal and pogba). Good thing he's quick to accept when he's wrong and adaptI'm not sure if his strength is building a team - his own signings at Chelsea were quite poor (Kante was signed before him) & I don't think he had much influence in Juventus' recruitment. But he seems to get the most out of the resources available to him - at least for a while, in Chelsea's case.
For starters, most managers don't have anything to do with signingsWhy do so many clubs get an instant impact from a new manager in terms of a tactical system, signings and motivated players yet we struggle left, right and center with any manager?
The same reason a new relationship breathes fresh air into some people and not others: package. You got lots of it. You're a hot mess.Why do so many clubs get an instant impact from a new manager in terms of a tactical system, signings and motivated players yet we struggle left, right and center with any manager?
What? That literally happened under Ole. We went on a fantastic run the first few months under him.Why do so many clubs get an instant impact from a new manager in terms of a tactical system, signings and motivated players yet we struggle left, right and center with any manager?
That's actually a bit of a deceptive statement with Conte.Good thing he's quick to accept when he's wrong and adapt
Yeah, i meant he's quick to accept and adapt when it comes to signingsThat's actually a bit of a deceptive statement with Conte.
He 'adapts' to his preferred system once it goes tits up with the system he inherited but (atleast with us) when managers started finding tactical answers to his 3atb he had absolutely no answer and we (save for 15/16) played our most tumescent and dour brand of football in the modern era.
Dortmund been off colour in recent months and Inter had better head to head record over two games so very frustrating campaign for them given they were 2 up in Dortmund and also 1 up in Barcelona and lost both of those games late on.It was a tough group, pretty harsh criticism.
He did o.k in the Paris away leg last season.Doesn't help when your star striker is absolute shite in big games, which all CL games are.
You may have tried but he had no intention to remain in the Prem.I feel Conte would have been perfect to take over Jose at United. We missed a trick here.
Me too. He worked well with the type of players Mourinho had around in Chelsea.I feel Conte would have been perfect to take over Jose at United. We missed a trick here.
Exactly my thoughts, he has Inter playing quite well and challenging in the league without having a strong squad like Juve.I feel Conte would have been perfect to take over Jose at United. We missed a trick here.
In that case Lukaku would still be here.I feel Conte would have been perfect to take over Jose at United. We missed a trick here.
What, skriniar de vrij and godin as a back three? That's as strong as any side in Europe at the back. But I agree he has done well. Still don't believe he was the right fit for United. He plays counter attacking football essentially. Isn't that what we want to get rid of? We want to start taking the game to the opposition, not wait for the game to come to us.Exactly my thoughts, he has Inter playing quite well and challenging in the league without having a strong squad like Juve.
Yes I not saying he has a shitty squad but I dont find it great, he has a solid defence and a good attack, the midfield is really poor, much like us.What, skriniar de vrij and godin as a back three? That's as strong as any side in Europe at the back. But I agree he has done well. Still don't believe he was the right fit for United. He plays counter attacking football essentially. Isn't that what we want to get rid of? We want to start taking the game to the opposition, not wait for the game to come to us.
Conte isn't a progressive manager, he's old school. When it works then great, but when it doesn't it goes to sh*t.
And scoring goals probablyIn that case Lukaku would still be here.
Inter press more than United actuallyWhat, skriniar de vrij and godin as a back three? That's as strong as any side in Europe at the back. But I agree he has done well. Still don't believe he was the right fit for United. He plays counter attacking football essentially. Isn't that what we want to get rid of? We want to start taking the game to the opposition, not wait for the game to come to us.
Conte isn't a progressive manager, he's old school. When it works then great, but when it doesn't it goes to sh*t.
It's pretty much how everything works in the universe.When it works then great, but when it doesn't it goes to sh*t.
Well he also made Giaccherini, Luiz, Moses, and Alonso almost look like a world class players at some point.He's doing an unbelievable job and making Rom look like a world beater. Fair play to him.
Yeah, he made Alonso look like a killer in 16-17...Well he also made Giaccherini, Luiz, Moses, and Alonso almost look like a world class players at some point.
Could we get a title change?
Antonio Conte | Hired as United DOF - May 2019
Difference is, he’s actually doing well with them. Mourinho was up to nothing.You realise he's purchased 3 30+ year olds from United alone, this forum was in freefall last summer when Mourinho tried to purchase Perisic and Willian FFS. (Who would be our 2 best players right now if Woodward had actually backed his man.)
Mourinho won the EL and LC in his first season and finished 2nd to Pep's £1B City (as well as being a Phil Jones mistake away from the FA Cup). What?Difference is, he’s actually doing well with them. Mourinho was up to nothing.
Conte is a serious manager. Just a tier below the Klopp’s of the world due to his inability in Europe
I thought you guys had gotten over your fetish for OAPs, considering how big a waste of money both Sanchez and Matic turned out to be. And you want to add another 2?You realise he's purchased 3 30+ year olds from United alone, this forum was in freefall last summer when Mourinho tried to purchase Perisic and Willian FFS. (Who would be our 2 best players right now if Woodward had actually backed his man.)
I wouldn't say Matic was a waste of money. He was very good in his first season then completely overplayed due to a lack of depth and options. Since coming back he's looked again.I thought you guys had gotten over your fetish for OAPs, considering how big a waste of money both Sanchez and Matic turned out to be. And you want to add another 2?
Matic was a collosal waste of money for £40m and 1 good season. 1 good season which delivered feck all in terms of tangible success.I wouldn't say Matic was a waste of money. He was very good in his first season then completely overplayed due to a lack of depth and options. Since coming back he's looked again.
Sanchez in hindsight was a poor purchase but age wasn't the reason.
Lots of teams purchase players over 28 and reap success. I don't need to list them but there are a lot of examples.
I don't think the "team nowhere good enough to win a title" is referring specifically to us buying Matic though. Our problem (up until this season where we sold Fellaini/Herrera and have had Pogba/McTominay injured) was not midfield.Matic was a collosal waste of money for £40m and 1 good season. 1 good season which delivered feck all in terms of tangible success.
I get buying 1-2 30+ year olds if they're the key to taking you over the line but Matic didn't do that. And Mourinho himself admitted the team was nowhere near good enough to win a title, so why did we spend £40m on him rather than get a younger alternative like Fabinho for the same price?
No I'm talking about Mourinho himself saying getting 2nd was a miracle success. If in his opinion the club was so far from the required level, why did he spend so much on players like Matic and Sanchez who you would typically buy to "take you over the line". Generally, with that type of investment you're signifying you're close to short term success.I don't think the "team nowhere good enough to win a title" is referring specifically to us buying Matic though. Our problem (up until this season where we sold Fellaini/Herrera and have had Pogba/McTominay injured) was not midfield.
We've failed in so many aspects (personnel, performance, management) over the past few years that it's