Makes sense.The troops should get minimum wage
And not the $15 per hour minimum wage either. $7.25Makes sense.
We already do.Also teachers should get part time pay for part time work.
You should call them and tell them.They should take your benefits away too.
And why should they do that ?They should take your benefits away too.
Benefits are for full time positions.And why should they do that ?
That's one way to look at it. You don't believe teachers are beneficial to society ?Benefits are for full time positions.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
awful lot of racists are in the police force now.This shit happens every day in every part of the country and the apologists on here try to pretend it's just a few bad apples. Its sickening. Police are an organized crime group
He shouldn't have had to have been riding his luck though.That guy was riding his luck though...
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Just a crime of “speeding”, no as it’s an infraction.I don't think you can actually be arrested for speeding, can you?
At what point does an infraction then lead to an arrest? I thought you had to just write a ticket for that and then go. The officer clearly said he was arresting the guy for speeding which seems to be a violation of his rights.Just a crime of “speeding”, no as it’s an infraction.
Unless he angles for some reckless driving angle but that’s rarely just straight up speed.
Well without knowing specifically what the stop was for, it would be hard to say for sure what angle he’d try and spin.At what point does an infraction then lead to an arrest? I thought you had to just write a ticket for that and then go. The officer clearly said he was arresting the guy for speeding which seems to be a violation of his rights.
Well if you tell someone you are arresting them for an infraction and they know that you can't do that, then are they within their rights to resist an illegal arrest?Well without knowing specifically what the stop was for, it would be hard to say for sure what angle he’d try and spin.
For example, in California I could drop someone for a straight speed violation of going over 65mph, and it would be an infraction. If I stop someone for reckless driving, which speed alone COULD justify depending on speed, traffic, etc, then it could ether be dealt with as a ticket and signed, or taken to jail as it’s a misdemeanor.
Similar to someone driving on a suspending license. We typically wouldn’t arrest someone for that, but certain states would.
Not that any of this is an endorsement for his actions, just trying to explain.
Yeah the Supreme Court has upheld that I believe. If there’s no grounds for an arrest, you can resist. Which I see both as a good and bad. Prefacing this with no I don’t believe anyone should be wrongfully arrested.Well if you tell someone you are arresting them for an infraction and they know that you can't do that, then are they within their rights to resist an illegal arrest?
That's horrible. On a training/procedure note, putting bodyweight on a combative/resisting suspect's back is actually very common practice. But it IS dangerous to keep someone like that for a prolonged time. Heck even when my toddler is on my back I struggle to breathe. As long as the cuffs are on and the suspect stops resisting/fighting, we (at my dept) get them on their side or sit them up. It definitely needs to be policy throughout the country though, as I don't believe it is.
It would only lead to an arrest if the person refuses to sign the citation. I'm curious to know why the cop had the guy out of the car in the first place. If he had reasonable suspicion for some other crime (drugs, weapons, etc) or if the driver indeed was refusing to sign and was just arguing.At what point does an infraction then lead to an arrest? I thought you had to just write a ticket for that and then go. The officer clearly said he was arresting the guy for speeding which seems to be a violation of his rights.