Rolaholic
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2016
- Messages
- 17,357
Giuseppe Antonaccio is United's lead scout in South America and he's been with the club since 2016. So this lad Orozco and Diego Leon previously were signed on the recommendation of our scout Giuseppe Antonaccio according to the Colombian source that first broke the Orozco transfer to us.
It’s 5’ 10” - 6ft isn’t 180cm178cm is not 5'8". 180cm is 6 foot, so he is around 5'11".
2 'talents' in 1-1.5 years, you've got to wonder how many we passed on since 2016.Giuseppe Antonaccio is United's lead scout in South America and he's been with the club since 2016. So this lad Orozco and Diego Leon previously were signed on the recommendation of our scout Giuseppe Antonaccio according to the Colombian source that first broke the Orozco transfer to us.
I would presume we passed on a number of talents due to our chief scout (Jim Lawlor) at the time being reluctant (according to some reports) towards signing players from the South American market. Lawlor was a prominent scout at the club from the Fergie days.2 'talents' in 1-1.5 years, you've got to wonder how many we passed on since 2016.
The guy has thrown so much shit to the wall that some stuff sticks. He’s cynically used here in South América cause he hypes so much crap. The “malas lenguas” (poisoned tongues, haha) says he gotten wealthy from his transfer hype, which if you think about it, makes total sense. He must’ve made duckets on that Moreno transfer to Citeh. Was way over the topHe also called Caicedo the best talent to come out of Ecuador since Valencia when we were linked to him in 2021.
3.5 million isn't going to break the bank.These type of signings rarely come off, especially when going directly to a club of this size.
People always bang on about Caicedo going to Brighton, but he was the exception rather than the rule.
It's far far better to let these type of players take a step up at a lower level where there's less of a spotlight and more time to develop with less scrutiny.
We waste so much money on completly unproven project players that would be better served on improving the first team.
Nope.
He's always been a hot-head, and he was overrated from the moment he arrived. He never had any truly exceptional qualities beyond running around like a lunatic.
Completely disagree. This is exactly what we should be doing and you shouldn't conflate the project signings we've made for the first team to this potential deal for the young 17 year old from Colombia who is reported to cost us £1m. The likes of Garnacho and Kobbie Mainoo and several others have been identified in similar fashion with the long-term in mind and we've made good money from them. With Garnacho the latest example of a young 16 year old being signed for £100k and being sold for around £40m.These type of signings rarely come off, especially when going directly to a club of this size.
People always bang on about Caicedo going to Brighton, but he was the exception rather than the rule.
It's far far better to let these type of players take a step up at a lower level where there's less of a spotlight and more time to develop with less scrutiny.
We waste so much money on completly unproven project players that would be better served on improving the first team.
Still dabbling.What’s happening with Dabo?
If done well, we should make back any money we spend on these sort of signings thoughThese type of signings rarely come off, especially when going directly to a club of this size.
People always bang on about Caicedo going to Brighton, but he was the exception rather than the rule.
It's far far better to let these type of players take a step up at a lower level where there's less of a spotlight and more time to develop with less scrutiny.
We waste so much money on completly unproven project players that would be better served on improving the first team.
Dont forget we came within a whisker of signing Caicedo before we got cold feet.2 'talents' in 1-1.5 years, you've got to wonder how many we passed on since 2016.
It took Caicedo a year and half to reach good levels Brighton, people tend to forget this. He also needed a full season with Chelsea to reach a consistent level.These type of signings rarely come off, especially when going directly to a club of this size.
People always bang on about Caicedo going to Brighton, but he was the exception rather than the rule.
It's far far better to let these type of players take a step up at a lower level where there's less of a spotlight and more time to develop with less scrutiny.
We waste so much money on completly unproven project players that would be better served on improving the first team.
Don’t worry, in a few years it will be pontificating the significant calf circumferences relative to progressive passing ability and press resistance.AbeSimpsonWalkInandOut.gif
Come in to read about the new signing, its posters squabbling over height measurements
About time we build long term again5 years until he's in the first team
This is clearly part of our transfer strategy for the last couple of years though. Buying up tonnes of exciting young and inexpensive talent. I’m well on board - the thinking behind it has to be that if even a one or two of them become top first team players then it’s worth it.5 years until he's in the first team
Dont forget we came within a whisker of signing Caicedo before we got cold feet.
We were also interested in Julian Alvarez and we had Martinelli on trial four times.
Our scouts can only make recommendations - dread to think how many we have passed on for basically no good reason.
This is clearly part of our transfer strategy for the last couple of years though. Buying up tonnes of exciting young and inexpensive talent. I’m well on board - the thinking behind it has to be that if even a one or two of them become top first team players then it’s worth it.
Moan if we don't take punts, moan if we do, moan if we sign established. Moan, moan, moanI understand not being 'excited', as it's true most young punts like this don't make it at big clubs. But how can some people be against these types of signings? They're low cost and are not impacting the first team transfers. It's not one or the other. it is, and should always be, both.
And players like this don't need to become world beaters - that's just the unfair expectations thrown at them by fans and media. They just need to become somewhat decent to recoup our spending or profit.
Yeah I don't disagree.This is clearly part of our transfer strategy for the last couple of years though. Buying up tonnes of exciting young and inexpensive talent. I’m well on board - the thinking behind it has to be that if even a one or two of them become top first team players then it’s worth it.
2 players in under a year is certainly progress. Missing out to Brighton isn’t something we should be doing again.
He was our best player in the academy at a point for sure,
You're right and wrong as well. The scouts at the bottom of the scouting chain or often known as the lead scouts make recommendations to the chief of scouting who then has to decided if the recommendation is good enough to be made to the higher ups who will then proceed to get a deal done. Our issue pertaining the South American market has been that the recommendations didn't pass through the chief of scouting with reports suggesting that Jim Lawlor seemed to have reservations about signing players from South America.Dont forget we came within a whisker of signing Caicedo before we got cold feet.
We were also interested in Julian Alvarez and we had Martinelli on trial four times.
Our scouts can only make recommendations - dread to think how many we have passed on for basically no good reason.
Exactly this. Chelsea have made £365mil from selling academy players since 2020.I understand not being 'excited', as it's true most young punts like this don't make it at big clubs. But how can some people be against these types of signings? They're low cost and are not impacting the first team transfers. It's not one or the other. it is, and should always be, both.
And players like this don't need to become world beaters - that's just the unfair expectations thrown at them by fans and media. They just need to become somewhat decent to recoup our spending or profit.
They hade a bit of an unfair advantage having the talent pool of London and a bottomless pit of money to dip into under Abramaovich. They've shifted that model somewhat to bigger purchases, I'm not sure it's as sustainable as before, but we'll see.Exactly this. Chelsea have made £365mil from selling academy players since 2020.
That's £73mil a year.
It's the way forward. A small few will make it, many may not. However it's more transfer money to put towards the first team.
Impressive young holding midfielder about to sign, shame he can’t join straight away. Our South American scouting network finally getting some results.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/36825703/man-utd-agree-transfer-cristian-orozco/
Being a bad passer is a prerequisite not a hindrance for usHonest verdict:
Passing - underwhelming (didn't look crisp at all whether it was short or turning play. Seems to lack through balls but I see that as a bonus, not a requirement for a DM)
Positioning - great (able to receive passes and to anticipate opposition passes)
Recoveries (as in actually turning and hunting down a player and winning it back) - probably lacking (didn't see much of it in the video)
Breakthrough ability - unclear (he clearly knows how to turn in to space but the pressing of the opponents was abysmal, slow paced and way too much space available)
Stamina, pace - unclear (didn't see it at all so need more pictures)
I love South American DMs as they usually have decent technique (not always the most refined to be honest, often just functional) on top of a nasty side and hard running. Based on the clip I wouldn't buy him or I would at least want to watch him for 2 games to better understand why I should consider it.