Cristiano Ronaldo - 968/1000

:lol: You’re just another fanboi.

Cute. However; that won’t delete his “Legend” profile on the official club website. Nor does it explain why it would be weird for United fans to follow a United legend.

This was the club, 4 days ago:



And this was the club, 2 days ago:



Seems like Manchester United Football Club is quite fond of Ronaldo. Harsh realities you’ve just gotta deal with. Also, I have one more post than you in this thread - 22 to 21 respectively - so I take it you also have a “fanboi” membership :confused:
 
Him walking out of the stadion while still being picked in the team as a sub, because we were playing better without him that match really destroys the idea the idea of him being a consummate professional and an ideal rolemodel in a team game. Leaving work on your shift when you're the highest paid player in the league should be called out.
That was really poor from him.
 
You use the term retarded logic and then go on to compare what Messi did for Barca to what Ronaldo did for United. Irony.

And no Ronaldo was not clearly our best player in any season aside from 2007 and he didn’t even play for us in 2009 but as you were.

I can’t be arsed to argue the entire fanboy army. Carry on with your wanking. Sorry to disturb.
You said that United continuing to win after his departure proves he wasn’t as integral as being made out so I compared it to Messi leaving and Barca still winning and asked if that meant that he wasn’t as integral to their success?
That has nothing to do with comparing Messi’s achievements with Barca to Ronaldo’s with United.

And you’re wrong. He was clearly our best player for at the very least 2 seasons (06/07 & 07/08). I can agree others were as important/more important in 08/09 (Vidic).

I would personally say he was our best player for the 2nd half of 05/06 aswell.
 
You said that United continuing to win after his departure proves he wasn’t as integral as being made out so I compared it to Messi leaving and Barca still winning and asked if that meant that he wasn’t as integral to their success?
I imagine that if Barca had sold Messi in his pomp and bought Valencia to replace him while Abu Dhabi was pumping truckloads of cash into Espanyol and TV revenue rights allowed for proper competition from the likes of Atleti and Valencia they would’ve been well and truly fecked.
 
You use the term retarded logic and then go on to compare what Messi did for Barca to what Ronaldo did for United. Irony.

And no Ronaldo was not clearly our best player in any season aside from 2007 and he didn’t even play for us in 2009 but as you were.

I can’t be arsed to argue the entire fanboy army. Carry on with your wanking. Sorry to disturb.
Unless im living im another dimension he did actually play for us in 2009.
 
There were plenty of catalysts as players and Ronaldo obviously wasn’t the very core of it or we would’ve stopped winning after he left. Never mind the Glazernomics we were operating with at the time. All you have to do is look at how things have gone post-Fergie to see who was driving our success.

I don’t know how you’ve managed to find that take weird or somehow insecure. And furthermore I think it’s smalltime to consider a player who had one outstanding season for us one of our best ever players. He certainly had one of the best seasons we’ve seen at the club. But that’s the measure of it.
What utter nonsense.

Ronaldo played for us for six seasons from being 18. He won our player of the year THREE times (04,07,08) his 08 season is up there with the best from George Best. Culminating in us almost doing the treble again and completing a double of league and CL (only the 3rd we’ve ever won and the last we won). Of all the great players in that side, and there were many…You take Ronaldo out of that side and we aren’t winning the CL.

In 07 he was outstanding and inspired our first league title since 2003 and broke Chelsea’s dominance, winning PFA player of the year and then retaining it. In 08 he became only the 4th United player to win the ballon d’or playing for United, and remains the last to do so.

In the six seasons he played for us we won….

3 x league titles
1 x CL
1 x fifa world club cup
1 x FA CUP
2 x league cups

We went from winning the league 3 times on the bounce after his transformation from potential to worlds best…to finishing second the season after he left.

In fact in the six seasons after he left we won…

2 x league titles
1 x league cup

We may not have completely stopped winning…but we massively dropped off. It’s evident, it’s factual and your point is disproven.

He’s literally one of the best players that has ever played the game and for three seasons he was, by SAF own admissions, the best player he ever managed. Being butt hurt because you liked someone else more will never change that fact or detract from the fact that any club would massively have missed their best player of the past three seasons and only GOAT regardless of how good other players were.
 
What utter nonsense.

Ronaldo played for us for six seasons from being 18. He won our player of the year THREE times (04,07,08) his 08 season is up there with the best from George Best. Culminating in us almost doing the treble again and completing a double of league and CL (only the 3rd we’ve ever won and the last we won). Of all the great players in that side, and there were many…You take Ronaldo out of that side and we aren’t winning the CL.

In 07 he was outstanding and inspired our first league title since 2003 and broke Chelsea’s dominance, winning PFA player of the year and then retaining it. In 08 he became only the 4th United player to win the ballon d’or playing for United, and remains the last to do so.

In the six seasons he played for us we won….

3 x league titles
1 x CL
1 x fifa world club cup
1 x FA CUP
2 x league cups

We went from winning the league 3 times on the bounce after his transformation from potential to worlds best…to finishing second the season after he left.

In fact in the six seasons after he left we won…

2 x league titles
1 x league cup

We may not have completely stopped winning…but we massively dropped off. It’s evident, it’s factual and your point is disproven.

He’s literally one of the best players that has ever played the game and for three seasons he was, by SAF own admissions, the best player he ever managed. Being butt hurt because you liked someone else more will never change that fact or detract from the fact that any club would massively have missed their best player of the past three seasons and only GOAT regardless of how good other players were.

Exactly, he was the catalyst in many games. We must also not forget the goals he got for us in the CL campaign, Porto away is probably one of the best CL goals, Arsenal away FK and in the final against Chelsea.

Fans can pretend to re-write history but you do not win a Ballon D'or by not being one of the best players.
 
Him walking out of the stadion while still being picked in the team as a sub, because we were playing better without him that match really destroys the idea the idea of him being a consummate professional and an ideal rolemodel in a team game. Leaving work on your shift when you're the highest paid player in the league should be called out.
Man child behaviour, who threw his toys out of his pram and went running to Piers Morgan to play the victim.
 
You said that United continuing to win after his departure proves he wasn’t as integral as being made out so I compared it to Messi leaving and Barca still winning and asked if that meant that he wasn’t as integral to their success?
That has nothing to do with comparing Messi’s achievements with Barca to Ronaldo’s with United.

And you’re wrong. He was clearly our best player for at the very least 2 seasons (06/07 & 07/08). I can agree others were as important/more important in 08/09 (Vidic).

I would personally say he was our best player for the 2nd half of 05/06 aswell.
Honestly, his early United years were pretty good as well. You won't see that in his stats but he had a couple of standout matches before his prime.

-2004 FA Cup final. Scored a header against Millwall and was the best player on the pitch.
-2005 vs Arsenal away- Everybody talks about that infamous tunnel incident but Ronaldo scored twice that day and he silenced Highbury (literally).
- 2005 FA Cup final- I watched this yesterday and he was incredible. Although we lost on penalties, he literally destoyed Arsenal's defence, especially Lauren. His dribbling in that match was astonishing and I wouldn't be surprised if he was close to having 10 successful dribbles.

Those matches were just a preview of what was to come for Ronaldo in his later United and Madrid years. His talent was undeniable and it's worth mentioning that even before his prime, he was a very good player.
 
You use the term retarded logic and then go on to compare what Messi did for Barca to what Ronaldo did for United. Irony.

And no Ronaldo was not clearly our best player in any season aside from 2007 and he didn’t even play for us in 2009 but as you were.

I can’t be arsed to argue the entire fanboy army. Carry on with your wanking. Sorry to disturb.
You are just objectively wrong here. Although his best years were in Madrid, he had three really good seasons for united between 2006 to 2009. He won a Ballon Do'r in 2008 and finished second in 2007 and 2009. He was our key player in our EPL three-peat EPL titles and the UCL title. And you could say that he was the best player in the world at that time, since he was more consistent than Kaka and Messi. I can't believe that you would write this type of nonsense. Even if you hated him, you have to acknowledge his incredible contributions to United.
 
Him walking out of the stadion while still being picked in the team as a sub, because we were playing better without him that match really destroys the idea the idea of him being a consummate professional and an ideal rolemodel in a team game. Leaving work on your shift when you're the highest paid player in the league should be called out.
yea great take on it too. I think more 'loyals' would do well to take the ronaldo tinted glasses off
 
The worst thing to ever happen on September 11th.

3000 civilians killed in one day vs Ronaldo playing for United again.

Tough one.

PS: Just saw that it was Rimaldo… and now I feel dumb
 
Last edited:
That was really poor from him.
For someone whose professionalism is talked up so much, that and his tantrums every time he was hooked were completely unprofessional.

"He just wants to play every minute" They all do.
 
You are just objectively wrong here. Although his best years were in Madrid, he had three really good seasons for united between 2006 to 2009. He won a Ballon Do'r in 2008 and finished second in 2007 and 2009. He was our key player in our EPL three-peat EPL titles and the UCL title. And you could say that he was the best player in the world at that time, since he was more consistent than Kaka and Messi. I can't believe that you would write this type of nonsense. Even if you hated him, you have to acknowledge his incredible contributions to United.
He clearly did but he’s not the only one who did. For all the moaning about Rooney after his early season injury issues in 06/07 he ended up on the same goal tally as Ronaldo in the end and all from open play. Vidić was quite clearly our best player in 08/09. Also think Rooney was better that season despite playing a subservient role to the poor captive.

The handbags in this thread at the idea that Ronaldo wasn’t some celestial being who was head and shoulders above every other footballer at Manchester United over that entire stretch again is just weird. As Manchester United fans it seems like we should be far more annoyed that he was clearly outshone by Kaka and Messi in the biggest stages of the CL than who did or didn’t win some stupid individual award.
 
He clearly did but he’s not the only one who did. For all the moaning about Rooney after his early season injury issues in 06/07 he ended up on the same goal tally as Ronaldo in the end and all from open play. Vidić was quite clearly our best player in 08/09. Also think Rooney was better that season despite playing a subservient role to the poor captive.

The handbags in this thread at the idea that Ronaldo wasn’t some celestial being who was head and shoulders above every other footballer at Manchester United over that entire stretch again is just weird. As Manchester United fans it seems like we should be far more annoyed that he was clearly outshone by Kaka and Messi in the biggest stages of the CL than who did or didn’t win some stupid individual award.
As a United fan you seem upset that he outshone Rooney. But it was always going to be about that. 30 more goals from the wing over those three seasons, while Rooney was getting his typical 12-14 league goals each season from CF.

There’s a story that came to light recently of Rooney being at Colleen’s uncles the night before signing for us. Eating Chinese and drinking wine…before signing for us wearing Colleen’s cousin’s jumper because he didn’t have any clothes there.

I know a lot of fans are drawn to Rooney because he’s a down to earth relatable ‘lad’ but ultimately he never developed from the player we signed and all the hype about him going on to be the next Pele, turned out to be just that. That story is Sunday league levels of professionalism and speaks volumes about his character and why he failed to reach his potential.

Trying to diminish what Ronaldo did from 06-09 is pretty bitter and pathetic. Sir Alex disagrees. Ronaldo is like the ornament on top of the Christmas tree of world class players he managed according to him.
 
Horrible logic. Using the same viewpoint, Messi wasn’t a catalyst at Barca because they were able to win after him. Madrid were also able to win after Ronaldo. Does that undermine what he did for the club beforehand?

Ronaldo was head and shoulders the best player on the team between 06-09. No amount of mental gymnastics will change that.
He was not good at all until April in the season 08/09
 
He clearly did but he’s not the only one who did. For all the moaning about Rooney after his early season injury issues in 06/07 he ended up on the same goal tally as Ronaldo in the end and all from open play. Vidić was quite clearly our best player in 08/09. Also think Rooney was better that season despite playing a subservient role to the poor captive.

The handbags in this thread at the idea that Ronaldo wasn’t some celestial being who was head and shoulders above every other footballer at Manchester United over that entire stretch again is just weird. As Manchester United fans it seems like we should be far more annoyed that he was clearly outshone by Kaka and Messi in the biggest stages of the CL than who did or didn’t win some stupid individual award.
Ronaldo wasn't surrounded by bums. Obviously he had many world class teammates like Scholes, Rooney, Vidić, Rio, Giggs etc. But he was clearly a level above his teammates and probably the best player in the world at that time.

Kaka was outstanding in the UCL but pretty average in the league where he only scored 8 goals and finished 4th. In my opinion Ronaldo was clearly a better and more consistent player than Kaka. I'll grant you that Messi was better in 2008/09 season. But if you combine that time period, Ronaldo was the most consistent player out of those three players and left Utd as the most expensive player in the world.
 
You are just objectively wrong here. Although his best years were in Madrid, he had three really good seasons for united between 2006 to 2009. He won a Ballon Do'r in 2008 and finished second in 2007 and 2009. He was our key player in our EPL three-peat EPL titles and the UCL title. And you could say that he was the best player in the world at that time, since he was more consistent than Kaka and Messi. I can't believe that you would write this type of nonsense. Even if you hated him, you have to acknowledge his incredible contributions to United.
SAF and United helped him more..

3 league titles in 6 years at United.. 4 league titles outside United in 16 years..
United kept on winning 2 titles in 4 years after him and played a UCL final..
 
SAF and United helped him more..

3 league titles in 6 years at United.. 4 league titles outside United in 16 years..
United kept on winning 2 titles in 4 years after him and played a UCL final.
That's just throwing stats without any context. Luka Modric has 6 UCL titles and 4 La Liga titles, which shows that Madrid does generally better in the UCL than La Liga.

Ronaldo with Madrid- 4 UCL titles, 2 La Liga titles in 9 years
Ronaldo in Man Utd and Juventus- 5 League titles, 1 UCL title in 9 years

See how much it changed? And Utd were obviously still a top club after he left, but we really couldn't compete with Pep's Barca because Ronaldo and Tevez left and dreadful transfers that we had after 2009.
 
He clearly did but he’s not the only one who did. For all the moaning about Rooney after his early season injury issues in 06/07 he ended up on the same goal tally as Ronaldo in the end and all from open play.
Yeah this is a disingenuous take. They played completely different positions. If you actually watched empirically, you wouldn’t even be making this comparison. Ronaldo was magnitudes better that season which is reflected in him sweeping just about every individual award on offer at the end of the season and finishing 2nd in the BDOR.
 
That's just throwing stats without any context. Luka Modric has 6 UCL titles and 4 La Liga titles, which shows that Madrid does generally better in the UCL than La Liga.

Ronaldo with Madrid- 4 UCL titles, 2 La Liga titles in 9 years
Ronaldo in Man Utd and Juventus- 5 League titles, 1 UCL title in 9 years

See how much it changed? And Utd were obviously still a top club after he left, but we really couldn't compete with Pep's Barca because Ronaldo and Tevez left and dreadful transfers that we had after 2009.

Real Madrid have by a good margin the most La Liga titles in history, so this is clearly nonsense.
 
Real Madrid have by a good margin the most La Liga titles in history, so this is clearly nonsense.

On the past I've tried to hold some people going after KingEric, since some time he has been too cringe for his own good.
 
Him walking out of the stadion while still being picked in the team as a sub, because we were playing better without him that match really destroys the idea the idea of him being a consummate professional and an ideal rolemodel in a team game. Leaving work on your shift when you're the highest paid player in the league should be called out.

He was extremely unprofessional during his second stint for us. The interview, walking down the tunnel before full time when on the bench, getting pissy when subbed, refusing to come on as a sub, hitting a phone out of a disabled kid's hand, ignoring away fans when a game was lost/he didn't score and storming off down the tunnel. He's clearly immature, strops a lot, and is childlike in his social media behaviour. He really wants to win and tries really hard and those are great traits that go a long way. But being a model professional is about more than that. You don't get to act the way he did at United and still be called a model professional.
 
Question - when he gets in 999, will he purposefully go off form in the Saudi league, so he can get his 1000th for Portugal? Or even at the World Cup if he's allowed to go? Surely you dont want the big 1000 to come away to Al-Riyadh.
Nah he would want to score as many goals as possible to ensure no one catches his record so no way this will happen.
 
Real Madrid have by a good margin the most La Liga titles in history, so this is clearly nonsense.
It's not nonsense because I am talking about the modern period of Real Madrid. In the 21st century Barcelona has more La Liga titles than Real Madrid and since 2009 they have twice as many La Ligas compared to Madrid. How do you explain Modric having 6 UCLs and only 4 La Ligas?

Since Barcelona's last triumph in the UCL in 2015, Barcelona has still won more La Ligas than Madrid. During that time Madrid has won 5 UCLs and Barcelona had 0 UCL finals. You would think that Madrid would dominate La Liga (because of so many UCL titles) but they didn't. So it's clearly not "nonsense".

You can see that even in different leagues. How many titles does Juventus have in Serie A in this century? I don't have the exact number but it's probably around 13-15 range. AC Milan only has a couple of titles in Serie A but they have more UCL titles than Juve but it shouldn't be like that. Simply put, some teams are more suited to their domestic leagues and 38 game campaigns whereas some clubs are more cup oriented teams.

Carlo Ancelotti's league record is pretty subpar but his cup and European record is excellent. Pep Guardiola has countless league titles but "only" 3 UCLs. Same with Ferguson. Even when it comes to coaching, it's evident. You wouldn't bet on Conte to win the UCL title or Unai Emery to win a domestic league title.
 
He was not good at all until April in the season 08/09
Maybe in performances (I somewhat agree) but numbers wise he still made the difference for us in the league and CL. But yes it wasn’t a good season for him by the standard he set in the previous 2 seasons.
 
It's not nonsense because I am talking about the modern period of Real Madrid. In the 21st century Barcelona has more La Liga titles than Real Madrid and since 2009 they have twice as many La Ligas compared to Madrid. How do you explain Modric having 6 UCLs and only 4 La Ligas?

Since Barcelona's last triumph in the UCL in 2015, Barcelona has still won more La Ligas than Madrid. During that time Madrid has won 5 UCLs and Barcelona had 0 UCL finals. You would think that Madrid would dominate La Liga (because of so many UCL titles) but they didn't. So it's clearly not "nonsense".

You can see that even in different leagues. How many titles does Juventus have in Serie A in this century? I don't have the exact number but it's probably around 13-15 range. AC Milan only has a couple of titles in Serie A but they have more UCL titles than Juve but it shouldn't be like that. Simply put, some teams are more suited to their domestic leagues and 38 game campaigns whereas some clubs are more cup oriented teams.

Carlo Ancelotti's league record is pretty subpar but his cup and European record is excellent. Pep Guardiola has countless league titles but "only" 3 UCLs. Same with Ferguson. Even when it comes to coaching, it's evident. You wouldn't bet on Conte to win the UCL title or Unai Emery to win a domestic league title.

The reason that Barcelona have more league titles than Madrid in the modern era is mostly because of Lionel Messi. In every other era, save a couple (Cruyff as a manager and NOT as a player, for example), Madrid have been more successful in the league.

Barca also went from 1 CL to 5 in Messi's time at the club. Just another reason that he is better than Ronaldo, whose clubs are successful with or without him. Madrid have won 2 CLs since he left, which is more than Barcelona had in their entire history pre-Messi.
 
The reason that Barcelona have more league titles than Madrid in the modern era is mostly because of Lionel Messi. In every other era, save a couple (Cruyff as a manager and NOT as a player, for example), Madrid have been more successful in the league.

Barca also went from 1 CL to 5 in Messi's time at the club. Just another reason that he is better than Ronaldo, whose clubs are successful with or without him. Madrid have won 2 CLs since he left, which is more than Barcelona had in their entire history pre-Messi.
Messi was a fringe player for his first 2 La Liga wins (7 league games played in 04/05 & 17 games played in 05/06 - mostly off the bench) & didn’t play past the RO16 for his first CL win. It was the Ronaldinho+Eto’o show, primarily.

When he did become the talisman, he was part of a star-studded lineup (core of the same team that won 3 major international tournaments in a row).

With Messi, Barca weren’t able to win in Europe for the best part of a decade after 2015. They had no problem winning the league and Copa del Rey after he left.

Exaggerating Messi’s impact while undermining that of his teammates.

Expected that from you anyway.

Madrid had their worst season in a decade directly after Ronaldo left. They managed to recover and move on though like all clubs of that stature should do.
 
Last edited:
Yeah this is a disingenuous take. They played completely different positions. If you actually watched empirically, you wouldn’t even be making this comparison. Ronaldo was magnitudes better that season which is reflected in him sweeping just about every individual award on offer at the end of the season and finishing 2nd in the BDOR.
This is a disingenuous thread. I’ve had posts deleted because they infringed on what is obviously supposed to be a fanboy safe space. I’ll leave yous to it. #CR7forever
 
Leaving Messi and Cristiano aside and all the nonsense that at times are said about both in this thread.

There is no such thing as: "we don't care about the league" on either of Barca, or Real, they just couldn't when they failed to win it. As simple as that.

Yet of course when you know that things are fvcked up, to bet on save the year on a CL it's quite a thing, or even at times to try start to turn the tide like Mou's very important Copa del rey with that gorgeous CR header it's way closer to reality than the "they just don't care" on any given competition of a any huge club. That's plain nonsense.
 
Messi was a fringe player for his first 2 La Liga wins (7 league games played in 04/05 & 17 games played in 05/06 - mostly off the bench) & didn’t play past the RO16 for his first CL win. It was the Ronaldinho+Eto’o show, primarily.

And had Messi not come through, it would have remained at 2 league titles (maybe a couple more) and 1 CL for a significant period, instead of Barcelona becoming the dominant force in La Liga in a manner that had never been seen before, and becoming a genuine European power, a status that their pre-Messi history had not afforded them, despite the club's glamour and reputation for attracting the best players ever (more than any other club)
When he did become the talisman, he was part of a star-studded lineup (core of the same team that won 3 major international tournaments in a row).

That team had Barca players, but also players like Ramos, Silva, Fabregas, prime Torres (winning goal in Euro 2008 final), Senna, Casillas, Capdevila, Alonso etc. who were nothing to do with Barca at the time (Fabregas went there in 2011).
With Messi, Barca weren’t able to win in Europe for the best part of a decade after 2015. They had no problem winning the league and Copa del Rey after he left.

He left in 2021, so I think your maths is a bit off here. Maybe we could say that Ronaldo was unable to win a CL 'for the best part of a decade' when he first got to Real Madrid (until Modric got there), since we're being cavalier with the meaning of that phrase.
Exaggerating Messi’s impact while undermining that of his teammates.

Expected that from you anyway.

No idea what this means.
Madrid had their worst season in a decade directly after Ronaldo left. They managed to recover and move on though like all clubs of that stature should do.
No. They've won 2 CLs since. There are no clubs for which 2 CLs would not be a huge proportion of their total CL success in their entire history. Apart from Real Madrid. A club like Juventus, a giant, would kill for 2 CLs wins.
 
The reason that Barcelona have more league titles than Madrid in the modern era is mostly because of Lionel Messi. In every other era, save a couple (Cruyff as a manager and NOT as a player, for example), Madrid have been more successful in the league.

Barca also went from 1 CL to 5 in Messi's time at the club. Just another reason that he is better than Ronaldo, whose clubs are successful with or without him. Madrid have won 2 CLs since he left, which is more than Barcelona had in their entire history pre-Messi.
Messi was brilliant in the UCL for Barcelona but you can't forget Dinho's impact on that team. Messi has 4 UCL's but he was a crucial player in 3 of those tournaments. Ronaldinho Gaucho was the player who truly revived Barcelona, similar to Cantona at Man Utd.

Ronaldo's record in domestic leagues is inferior to Messi's but if you look at the context it isn't that much inferior. Messi has 12 domestic league titles vs 7 of Ronaldo. But, he was pretty much a passenger in his first two La Liga campaigns, so it's around
10 campaigns where he was a key figure.

And two of them came in Ligue 1. In reality Mbappe was a more important player than Messi there and it's Ligue 1. I think that majority of people would agree that Serie A, La Liga and EPL are the best leagues in the world and Ligue 1 lags behind those three.

So it's around 10 vs 7 league titles for Messi and 8-7 if you exclude Ligue 1. To be fair to Messi he has far more golden boots, so he's clearly better in domestic club football but Ronaldo's adaption and flexibility is seriously underrated. He's only player to win the golden boot in Serie A, La Liga and EPL. Also he's the only player to have over 100 goals in La Liga and EPL.

And you said that Madrid won 2 UCLs after Ronaldo left, well Barcelona won 2 league titles in 4 years (after Messi left) And this Barca squad is arguably the best one since 14/15 season. So they are hardly falling apart.

You know who is falling apart? Juve and Man Utd where he was deemed as a "problem". So it goes like this:

After Messi left Barca- roughly remained the same
After Messi left PSG- they're even better now

After Ronaldo left Madrid- roughly the same
After he left Juve- Juve became much worse
After he left Utd- United is in much worse state compared to his second stint at Utd.
 
Messi was brilliant in the UCL for Barcelona but you can't forget Dinho's impact on that team. Messi has 4 UCL's but he was a crucial player in 3 of those tournaments. Ronaldinho Gaucho was the player who truly revived Barcelona, similar to Cantona at Man Utd.

Ronaldo's record in domestic leagues is inferior to Messi's but if you look at the context it isn't that much inferior. Messi has 12 domestic league titles vs 7 of Ronaldo. But, he was pretty much a passenger in his first two La Liga campaigns, so it's around
10 campaigns where he was a key figure.

And two of them came in Ligue 1. In reality Mbappe was a more important player than Messi there and it's Ligue 1. I think that majority of people would agree that Serie A, La Liga and EPL are the best leagues in the world and Ligue 1 lags behind those three.

So it's around 10 vs 7 league titles for Messi and 8-7 if you exclude Ligue 1. To be fair to Messi he has far more golden boots, so he's clearly better in domestic club football but Ronaldo's adaption and flexibility is seriously underrated. He's only player to win the golden boot in Serie A, La Liga and EPL. Also he's the only player to have over 100 goals in La Liga and EPL.

And you said that Madrid won 2 UCLs after Ronaldo left, well Barcelona won 2 league titles in 4 years (after Messi left) And this Barca squad is arguably the best one since 14/15 season. So they are hardly falling apart.

You know who is falling apart? Juve and Man Utd where he was deemed as a "problem". So it goes like this:

After Messi left Barca- roughly remained the same
After Messi left PSG- they're even better now

After Ronaldo left Madrid- roughly the same
After he left Juve- Juve became much worse
After he left Utd- United is in much worse state compared to his second stint at Utd.

Leaving your bias aside. That I'll just leave it there because since some time you have board that boat to never leave it.

This time, for me (I might be wrong) what Kwabs meant, it's that in a historical point of view, Messi changed the scenery in Barcelona in a historical way that even as big as Barca would mantein to be and already was, it was crucial, marking an Era.

This (beyond Messi) is actually a characteristic of how Barca historically has been. A tad more messianic in terms of the influence of certain players in their history and how they operated usually in the market. From huge influences all over the place a la Cryuff (even if him as a player didn't brought the CL), to sometimes for shorter periods (Ronaldinho (in a lesser way Rivaldo/Romario) and finally sometimes failing to build around and mantein a possible one (Maradona, R9), they historically had a tendency to seek a savior and at times finding them.

Madrid just at the beggining with Di Stefano, was quite messianic, yet later on they were always more flexible in their approach, in their transfers (at times at the cost of their very own academy) policies, in not needing as much as Barca some individual talisman to get bigger heights, at times even buying everyone out there, yet they learned how to operate as a huge club (or THE CLUB) after Alfredo and never left that boat, navigating some big storm at times, but being way more cynical, cunning overall and way less auto destructive at times knowing they already are THE club and Barca still the aspirational contender.

Only in later years Barca with Pep starting an almost full La Masia approach, Barca has finally settle in a more youth oriented team and even trying to lure their next Talisman from very young ages a la Messi (like Yamal now) instead of going and buying it. While also adding this sort of individual oriented huge talent to thrive more in their more collective complementary passing style academy than in the past.

That's why with Messi they had a period with his name written in stone, it's in their nature and they might finally find the cure if Yamal ends being even greater and with their international scout approach snatching these types from all over the world very young (plus those special ones from the City itself or near) into a very well oild academy like it seems to be nowadays.

We'll see, not long ago with money issues, they had to pull out the palancas to not fall from a cliff and find the Lewas and cia to at least gain time for a Flick to get stable and develope their new young Army.