Portugal actually do the opposite. They rarely tried to find Ronaldo which was a big criticism from many Portuguese people and others online. Argentina’s team is the opposite. It’s completely (rightly) built around utilising Messi. And what wild claims did I actually make in any of my comments before you quoted me? I’d say the same for all those other sides too. They pretty much underperformed relative to their actual level. That’s why Germany is having an overhaul and Brazilian media were incensed by Brazil’s elimination. All those teams disappointed at the final hurdle. All I was saying was that Argentina weren’t beating any goliaths but they did well.
Yeah fair enough which is why I said he did well enough earlier.
I quote you here because the Cristiano thread makes more sense. In my opinion, you're comparing apples and oranges here. The most important aspect, for me, is that the squad situation is vastly different. Argentina's best players after Messi are probably Enzo, Alvarez and Lautaro. Good players, no doubt, and the rest of the squad is rock solid as well. But I doubt they'd funnel as much through Messi as they did if they had Vitinha, Joao Neves and Bruno Fernandes available. Those guys are among the best in the world. Moreover, Messi likes to drop deep and orchestrate the play while Cristiano at this stage of his career is - and frankly speaking, has been for at least 10 years - a target striker. Finding Messi around the box, in the half spaces or even in the middle of the pitch is much easier than creating chances for your striker.
