- Joined
- Mar 31, 2024
- Messages
- 1,742
- Supports
- Barcelona
If we are looking at the "big 5" leagues Messi has 1 more goal than Ronaldo, however Ronaldo played in better leagues than Messi. Messi also had an advantage because he played in a one single league throughout his whole career and then went to a relatively weak French league. Ronaldo frequently changed the clubs and the leagues and it's very hard to do that compared to staying in one league throughout your whole life. Messi's domestic league campaign is definitely better than Ronaldo's but Ronaldo's ability to change environments in a relative ease is pretty underrated in my opinion.
It's slightly better at 0.2 goals per game, but Ronaldo was far better in the knockout stages than Messi. 0.80 vs 0.64 per game ratio in the knockout stages for Ronaldo. Even if we combine the goal contributions Ronaldo was still better than Messi. Ronaldo has won more UCL titles where he was a protagonist than Messi. 5 vs 3 for Ronaldo (Messi was a passenger in 05/06). Ronaldo has more golden boots than Messi 7 vs 6. Ronaldo even has more assists than Messi in both knockout stages and overall in the UCL and Messi is supposed to be a far better playmaker. Ronaldo has twice amount of free kick goals as Messi 12 vs 6 (or 7). Ronaldo actually has the most free kick goals in the UCL history despite being ridiculed for years.
Messi was a better dribbler than Ronaldo, can anyone dispute that?! Just look at the amount of goals of Messi vs Ronaldo from the quarter finals to finals:
Quarter-finals:
25 goals in 22 games for Ronaldo
12 goals in 23 games for Messi
Semi-finals:
13 goals in 21 games for Ronaldo
6 goals in 15 games for Messi
Benzema and Lewa have more semi final goals than Messi, and Di Stefano and Puskas if you count European Cup (pre 1992)
Finals:
4 goals in 6 games for Ronaldo
2 goals in 4 games for Messi
Messi has more goals than Ronaldo in the round of 16, but in the deeper stages of the UCL, Ronaldo simply oblitirates Messi and this is what separates them in my opinion. Ronaldo was more "clutch" and more of a big game player than Messi in the UCL. He has more golden boots than Messi and was a main protagonist than Messi in the UCL winning campaigns. Even in categories where Messi is supposedly "way better" like assists and free kicks (debatable), Ronaldo has better stats than Messi. Even though Messi is a way better dribbler than Ronaldo, Ronaldo's dribbling prime was pretty underrated. Ronaldo averaged around 4 dribbles per 90 in his Man Utd days, with his peak being 6 dribbles per 90 in 04/05.
Nah, Ronaldo just focused on tap ins more. As an all round player, Messi was still better, IMO. I'd take his best goals and performances in the CL over Ronaldo's best goals and performances any day of the week.
In fact, the only Ronaldo goal I can clearly remember for Madrid (when he was in arch tap in mode - United Ronaldo was more varied) is the overhead kick. None of the others stick in my mind. With Messi, I can remember loads off the top of my head. Against Real Madrid, against Bayern (poor Boateng), against United etc. I can remember great performances where he didnt even score (e.g. the game against Man City). What great performance did Ronaldo have where he didn't score a goal? I'm struggling to remember any.
Also, how 'clutch' can you be (even as just a goalscorer) when you face Messi in a CL final and lose without scoring and also face Messi in a CL semi final and lose without scoring?
It must be tough being Ronaldo - everything he dreams of (the most European Golden boots, the most Ballon D'Ors, the World Cup etc.), Messi gets in reality. The curse of being second best. Harsh.

.