Cristiano vs Ten Hag

His interview forced United'a hand. It was so horrible that United had to let him go immediately and nobody but Saudi would realistically touch that stinky bag of hot potatoes of the situation

Without that interview things could have been quite different and EtH may not have even been able to force him out. The Erik and club preferred to keep him on the bench
I agree, there was no way for us to know. Ronaldo most likely had a deal with Saudi already and that interview was just a ruse to rip up his contract. Had the club read the situation, they could have got a fee but again, that's all hindsight.
 
ETH had his flaws, but he handled Ronaldo brilliantly. The CR7 fans claiming otherwise have lost their mind.

"it is clear that Cristiano was far from done, at the top level, when he left United."

He's playing in Saudi Arabia since then. He's done at the top level. And he was done at the top level that same season. He had a string of awful performances.
 
Ronaldo was done at the top level a year or two before he joined us. Yeah, he scored regularly for Juventus, but they were considerably worse with him in the team. By the time he joined us, he had reached a point where the only way he could contribute anything in a game was if the entire team was built to feed him, and he had not been worth that since his Real Madrid days (and arguably not even during his last year with them).
 
we'd have been much much better off buying a midfielder and keeping Cavani
 
We were right to move him on. His attitude stank the place out. Yes, has an absolutely incredible winning mentality, but very entitled and tbh not the sort of character that I want at the club. Incredible memories from his first spell at the club, of course. But you don't refuse to come off the bench, leave the game early, behave like he did with Maguire and expect that sort of behaviour is going to be a good example for younger players coming through.

He can go and run off to his mate Piers again when things aren't going his way and throw his toys out the pram. He'll moan about the club being rotten and he's not wrong on some of that, but he contributed to that rot as well...

Not your question, of course, but his second spell kind of soured my feelings on his legacy at the club. I just don't see him the same way as I do other legends I grew up watching in the 90s and 00s.

Added to that, agree with those saying he actually was done at the top level, really!

I do wonder about this when you say his attitude stank the place out. I think it's one of those where fans just throw out something we know very little about and make it into truth.

What was said from Ronaldo, and also from teammates was that Ronaldo trained very hard and wanted to help younger players learn from him and improve. What he reacted to was that the younger players weren't interested, didn't train hard nor did they prepare well enough. So he had an issue with the attitude of several teammates. He has been proven right in that respect. He also had an issue with the attitude of the club, and how they had neglected the training facilities, the stadium, some inner power struggles etc - which he was also right about. If anything, the attitude that stank the place out was from several of his teammates who simply didn't put the work in and played like superstars when they weren''t.

Sure, Ronaldo has an ego bigger than the moon, but his dedication to the game and to Manchester United have never really been, nor should it be, in question. Him running off the Piers Morgan was not the right move, and it was detrimental to his legacy and caused far too much harm. On the flip side, United have actually undergone renovations afterwards, and they have put pressure on several of the things that he pointed out. Interestingly, the official United websites, Norway for instance, still post things about him, so perhaps many actually did agree with him.

All that being said, he should not have returned to the PL that late in his career. His first season was good, and I don't think his pace was a problem - he was still more than fast enough, but he became so stiff that he couldn't do what he wanted to anymore.
 
No Manager in Europe can contain CR7, not even Ancelotti or Pep, if I am CR7, I would not accept any manager to dictate anything to me or bench me, so it was right to let him go, it was wrong to bring him in the first place as well.

Let's just forget that episode of unnecessary drama.
 
Ronaldo was done at the top level a year or two before he joined us. Yeah, he scored regularly for Juventus, but they were considerably worse with him in the team. By the time he joined us, he had reached a point where the only way he could contribute anything in a game was if the entire team was built to feed him, and he had not been worth that since his Real Madrid days (and arguably not even during his last year with them).
Don't think he was done up until he started acting up, he was very good in his first season, the second not so much. The team around him wasn't great either.
The primadona attitude though outweighed his contributions.
Overall ETH did very well to stand up against him.
 
we'd have been much much better off buying a midfielder and keeping Cavani
Go back a season more, we'd have arguably been better off sticking with Martial as CF and picking up someone cheap as backup (or just buying Haaland). Too much money wasted on old farts who didn't ever really hit top level.
 
He was right about ETH and the club but he was finished as a top player, he needed to take a step back and become a squad player/mentor but wasn't willing to do that. Getting rid of him was the correct decision, getting rid of ETH earlier would have been the even better scenario in combination too.
 
Looking back, it is clear that Cristiano was far from done, at the top level, when he left United. He left basically because he clashed with EtH.

In retrospect, would we have been better off keeping Cristiano and bringing a manager who could deal with him + build a team around him, or giving a chance to Erik? Were the FA Cup and League Cup, EtH got us, better deals?
Ronaldo wanted to go because we didn't qualify for the champions league. The ETH stuff just a smokescreen.
 
Looking back, it is clear that Cristiano was far from done, at the top level, when he left United. He left basically because he clashed with EtH.

In retrospect, would we have been better off keeping Cristiano and bringing a manager who could deal with him + build a team around him, or giving a chance to Erik? Were the FA Cup and League Cup, EtH got us, better deals?
If you could tell us how he wasn’t done at the top level, please do. He can’t press and he isn’t agile even a few years ago
 
For all that Ten Hag drove everyone insane its easy to forget that he did really well dealing with the Sancho/Ronaldo nonsense.
 
No Manager in Europe can contain CR7, not even Ancelotti or Pep, if I am CR7, I would not accept any manager to dictate anything to me or bench me, so it was right to let him go, it was wrong to bring him in the first place as well.

Let's just forget that episode of unnecessary drama.
Why not?
 
Why though, CR7 is the biggest football player alongside Messi, no way he accepts to be told to press, come off the bench, and so on, that's a reality, he didn't accept EtH benching him, he reacted badly when Ragnick subbed him out once, it's what its.
 
We scored 73 goals in the league the season before he came. Then we became Pass It To Ronaldo FC, which meant Bruno scored less, the wingers scored less, Cavani scored less because he was tossed aside, and we scored 57 goals.

But Ronaldo personally nicked a goal every other game with the whole attack sacrificing itself to cater to him, so this is somehow evidence of him being good for us. :lol:


Sums it up for me
 
This. He was a corrosive influence in the squad who was unprofessional, on top of his clear deficiencies on the pitch. He undermined the authority of the manager repeatedly - leaving the stadium early twice - against Rayo Vallecano in a friendly and despite being warned, he took it a step further and refused to come on against Spurs and left the stadium early. No one needs reminding of that horrible interview with Piers either. He was at a junction in his career where his considerable on and off field baggage far outweighed the relatively limited goal threat (relative to his peak) that he provided on the pitch. One of the worst mistakes United committed over the past decade or so, which is saying something.
So true. Thoughtful post, clear and on point
 
Looking back, it is clear that Cristiano was far from done, at the top level, when he left United.

Whichever top club he was at he wasn't going to listen to the manager. Top clubs want their players to follow tactics but his ego doesn't allow him to and he wasn't good enough for the team to carry his duties anymore, so he was done at the top.

Haaland is a monster, way way better than Ronaldo was at United, but City fans sometimes consider whether he's worth it because teams don't carry passengers anymore that score and don't do much else, unless they're scoring a ridiculous amount, which Ronaldo wasn't.
 
Looking back, it is clear that Cristiano was far from done, at the top level, when he left United. He left basically because he clashed with EtH.

In retrospect, would we have been better off keeping Cristiano and bringing a manager who could deal with him + build a team around him, or giving a chance to Erik? Were the FA Cup and League Cup, EtH got us, better deals?
jesus wept, far from done, really? he was done before coming to us already at the top level. Just because his hattrick against the nobodies like Norwich doesnt mean he still had it. His conversion rate was absolutely horrible along with his inability to work off the ball. He was like abrat, who wanted to pass to him everytime yet he wasn't able to work hard enough without it. He's irrelevant for many years now, going to a Saudi scum league which tries to hoard players for money, yet they still fcuk sheep after each game.

He can chase his 1000 goals in absolutely irrelevant league.
 
Why though, CR7 is the biggest football player alongside Messi, no way he accepts to be told to press, come off the bench, and so on, that's a reality, he didn't accept EtH benching him, he reacted badly when Ragnick subbed him out once, it's what its.
I understand that's what he did.

I just don't understand why you said you would do the same and wouldn't just want to try to be a little bit of a team player (in a team sport!).
 
It is annoying to see recent history rewritten like this. Ronaldo was absolutely spent, and whatever he may have brought in terms of a winner’s mentality was easily negated by him acting like a prima Donna. Ronaldo should have just greeted fans at the entrance to OT. Like another poster said here, it really ruined a lot of my fond memories from his first spell at United. feck Ronaldo.
 
I believe United only stepped in and signed Ronaldo is because there were rumours of him going to City.
I remember it being something along these lines too.. I think I read that SAF personally intervened and made sure he was brought back to United.
 
If Ronaldo clearly wasn't done at the top level when he crashed out with us, he would have been signed by a Champions League club from a top 5 league.

He wasn't, because he clearly was done at the top level, which was further evidenced by the fact that he had to go play in a semi-pro league in order to keep scoring goals.

The one and only thing that Ronaldo did for us in his final season was rightfully call out the fact that the standards at United weren't acceptable, from the results down to what the training facility looked like. But in terms of being useful on the field, he was clearly past it.
 
I was so excited to have him back. His last minute goal against Villareal I think it was was an INSANE moment and I'll never forget it, it felt like a turning point for the club. Sadly, it was just a final nice memory of what used to be a truly world class footballer we were lucky to have.

But Cavani was better for us. It was kind of devastating to see Edison Cavani get shuttled out from being the best striker we've had in years to playing second fiddle to CR7, not gonna lie, and Solskjaer didn't have the character to do what was necessary when Ronaldo threw his toys out the pram. We had such a seemingly great on paper team as well, but it just didn't work.

Just sad that we made literally every mistake the late great AC Milan team of the 90's did, and began to rely on aging players with massive reputations, ego's, and wages, and no work ethic or ability (bar the aforementioned Cavani) and it absolutely killed us.
 
If you could tell us how he wasn’t done at the top level, please do. He can’t press and he isn’t agile even a few years ago
You are right, but why is pressing a necessary requirement for a striker? It is if you are EtH, but...

Honest question - do you think Ronaldo was more done when he joined us than say Lewandowski was when Lewa joined Barca? I think Barca got some positive use out of Lewandowski despite the "old" age, no?
 
jesus wept, far from done, really? he was done before coming to us already at the top level. Just because his hattrick against the nobodies like Norwich doesnt mean he still had it. His conversion rate was absolutely horrible along with his inability to work off the ball. He was like abrat, who wanted to pass to him everytime yet he wasn't able to work hard enough without it. He's irrelevant for many years now, going to a Saudi scum league which tries to hoard players for money, yet they still fcuk sheep after each game.

He can chase his 1000 goals in absolutely irrelevant league.
Mate, we are a club that had fecking Weghorst as the striker for half a season. I think Cristiano is better than that even now let alone back when he rejoined us

Nobody is claiming that Ronaldo was still Ballon D'Or winning self, anymore, but "done" is a much lower bar

Haaland is a monster, way way better than Ronaldo was at United, but City fans sometimes consider whether he's worth it because teams don't carry passengers anymore that score and don't do much else, unless they're scoring a ridiculous amount, which Ronaldo wasn't.
Not sure if you think Haaland is better than even young Ronaldo, but honestly - feck that overgrown mutant. Haaland will never be as good as Ronnie, overall. Five Ballon D'Ors vs none, and being one of two GOATs vs a top scoring striker at EPL that nobody will remember once he is retired.
 
Last edited:
He was verging on useless by the time he had his tantrum.

He criticized the ownership, sure - but he didn't seem to mind them when he was 'carrying the team'. :rolleyes:

"He's so professional, he just wants to play every minute and win every game" etc

Stropping and lashing out when subbed and refusing to go on as a sub are unprofessional acts.

I look forward to watching him be the elephant in the room/pitch for Portugal in the World Cup, again.

His return completely tainted him for me.
 
Last edited:
Stropping and lashing out when subbed and refusing to go on as a sub are unprofessional acts.
Couldn't agree more. Everything else aside that was really unprofessional. Can't help but compare his behavior to his Madrid teammate Casemiro, who also had some tough spells at United but dealt with them much much better
 
I understand that's what he did.

I just don't understand why you said you would do the same and wouldn't just want to try to be a little bit of a team player (in a team sport!).
Aah. I meant if i was a CR7, not if I was me.
 
If we had let him go to City. Pep would be out of job by now. No treble for them 100%.