From a random poster on the Caf (myself) seems an obvious truism though, doesn't it. Not too many examples of it, unfortunately. And the sentence - let alone being prosecuted under a draconian act that hardly applied back then (100 years ago) and definitely does not apply now - is a threat to a so-called democracy. You cannot defend properly so due process is completely abandoned. I know fascism is bandied about here and there when it's something entirely different, but that is a fascist piece of legislation and used as such. I would assume that every single instance of its use (at least in the last half century) is an example of a state acting outside of its mandate and undermining the civil liberties of all and the right of the people to be informed.
And Churchill was a bit of a monster with good sound bites here and there.