Declan Rice

Status
Not open for further replies.

lsd

The Oracle
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
10,784
If it means we can just play him instead of both Fred and McTominay then the fee will be worth it
 

Icemav

Full Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2016
Messages
1,697
He isn’t remotely good enough on the ball.

We need what Matic brings us in terms of composure and passing through the lines but somebody who is younger and athletic. I’m asking for a player of McTominay’s athleticism and mobility who is great positionally and can ping a ball. Rice isn’t that player.

In truth, I’m not even sure this player exists, which is why I’d want a player closer to Carrick, or Thiago, or Modric when he was shifted deeper. We need a player who can really get his foot on the ball in there and knock it about a bit. One who can still get stuck in and put himself about when push comes to shove.

Declan Rice is so far away from that player unless the intention is to play with a destroyer at the base of midfield. Ole isn’t really about that.
Agree.
 

MadDogg

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
15,810
Location
Manchester Utd never lose, just run out of time
He was utterly pedestrian in the two matches we played against Alkmaar last season. You'd think if we were interested, something would have been mentioned by now.
I watched Koop for the first time (other than against us) in his most recent match and was quite disappointed. He's obviously a decent passer although even that he didn't showcase as much as his youtube vids showcase. He did make one good defensive play and one good defence splitting pass, but otherwise he was average. Movement was slow and I got the impression he'd struggle in the much faster PL and the pressing that a lot of teams do. Of course this is based on one match so I could have just caught him on a bad one.
 

dutchred

Full Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2006
Messages
1,924
I think he is very good but what's the point of going for him for 70-80m when you get equally good DM in Europe for 30-40m?
Yes
Think
Gravenburch, Koopmeiners and Zakaria ( he was very good yesterday), all a lot cheaper
 

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
I wonder if Carrick can bring the passing out of a player like Rice or if he has already reached his max with it.

There is never a deep lying playmaker that is always going to be in the world's greatest in the tackles are they?

Pirlo was good at one but he had Gattuso. Xavi was good at one but had Busquests. Scholes arguably had Keanes, & others(and carrick/Hargreaves during the CL).

It kind of depends on what we really want right now; a dictator from the deep or a player that maybe holds one better (someone who holds a player like Pogba or his replacement).
 

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
30,138
Supports
Everton
He's in a weird limbo stage right now where he's too good for West Ham but not quite ready for a top team. Whoever gets him is going to have to deal with a steep learning curve but in 2 or 3 years time could have a fantastic holding player.
 

TheRedHearted

Full Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2016
Messages
2,633
Location
New York, NY
In terms of passing, he has the joint third-highest passing accuracy. Not much between him, Fred, Hojbjerg, and Kante.

Passing Success %: Rodrigo (90.9%), Matic (90.6%), Rice (87.6%), Hojbjerg (87.6%), Kante (87.5%), Fred (87%).

He is the third most creative defensive midfielder in the league.

% of passes per game that is a key pass: Phillips (1.9%), Neves (1.7%), Rice (1.6%), Fred (1.4%), Romeu (1.4%), Kante (1.3%), Rodri (0.9%)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tackles per game
Romeu (3.5), Allan (3.4), Kante (2.9), Phillips (2.9), Hojbjerg (2.8), Fred (2.7), Neves (2.3), Rice (1.9)

Interceptions per game
Kante (2.3), Rice (2.1), Jorginho (1.6), Fred (1.6), Neves (1.6)

Total tackles and interceptions per game
Kante (5.2), Romeu (5), Phillips (4.6), Allan (4.4), Fred (4.3), Hojbjerg (4), Rice (4), Neves (3.9)

On a side note, this Zakaria that people go on about. 2.1 tackles per game; 1.6 interceptions. Total 3.7 tackles and interceptions per game. 24 years old.

Don't really get how anyone can propose Zakaria as being so much better. The only area he exceeds him in is marginally through tackling, but only by 0.2 per game.

Dribbling wise, Zakaria had 2 per game last season compared to Rice's 1.1 this season. Is this worth sacrificing defensive ability, though? I mean, there is no guarantee he would be able to replicate it in the Premier League. This season Zakaria only has 0.9 per game.

Rice is also the youngest at 21. A lot of the highest DMs are between 27 and 30, and he is already closing on them. He is a very promising player who could go on to be the best in the Premier League.

Also, these stats show that Fred is massively underrated, anyway. The only reason I wouldn't sign Rice is that he isn't anywhere near a priority. I think McTominay's position is the one we need a signing in. A proper midfielder in that position will do us wonders.
[/QUOTE
Great post especially with the numbers to back it. I mean of course if Romeu was younger we would go in for him and if he could continue his form I think him for three years would be worth it. But that’s all a big it.
rice with numbers close to his at 21 shows a long term investment. I do wonder if we need another work in progress but the numbers show he’s almost there.


Ok maybe slightly pedantic, but my point being you could level that at a lot of players all over Europe. If you're going to set up that way anyway, Rice isnt really anything spectacular that warrants much attention and his shortcomings are a good reason to dismiss him as a signing - unless he was a bargain, which he won't be.
He isn’t remotely good enough on the ball.

We need what Matic brings us in terms of composure and passing through the lines but somebody who is younger and athletic. I’m asking for a player of McTominay’s athleticism and mobility who is great positionally and can ping a ball. Rice isn’t that player.

In truth, I’m not even sure this player exists, which is why I’d want a player closer to Carrick, or Thiago, or Modric when he was shifted deeper. We need a player who can really get his foot on the ball in there and knock it about a bit. One who can still get stuck in and put himself about when push comes to shove.

Declan Rice is so far away from that player unless the intention is to play with a destroyer at the base of midfield. Ole isn’t really about that.
You both should check the post I quoted above, would show Rice is good on the ball and his numbers are of the best. Seems he’s the type whose numbers are better than it seems.
 

davidmichael

Full Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Messages
3,373
I wonder if Carrick can bring the passing out of a player like Rice or if he has already reached his max with it.

There is never a deep lying playmaker that is always going to be in the world's greatest in the tackles are they?

Pirlo was good at one but he had Gattuso. Xavi was good at one but had Busquests. Scholes arguably had Keanes, & others(and carrick/Hargreaves during the CL).

It kind of depends on what we really want right now; a dictator from the deep or a player that maybe holds one better (someone who holds a player like Pogba or his replacement).
Exactly right and this my constant argument as if we had a pure out and out defensive midfielder like when we had Keane in his later years or Hargreaves it would mean we could play BOTH Fernandes and Pogba (if he stays) together and let them do their thing further forward.

Pogba will always drop deep and use his range of passing but he is NOT a defensive deep lying playmaker like a Pirlo or Xavi or Carrick all were so Pogba needs someone who has the mobility and stamina to cover all that ground needed (which Matic can’t do anymore) and shield the defence properly.

In having someone like Rice and a pacey yet not injury prone centre back like Konate we’d actually have a solid platform to go all out on teams that park the bus without fear of getting caught on the counter attack, Rice covers all ground in front of the defence whilst Konate who’s just an example rather than me saying he’s the solution has the pace to cover in behind Maguire just like Bailly is currently doing.

If we were then to sign a quality right sided attacker we’d have a perfectly balanced team which going forward would be for example Fernandes, Pogba, right sided attacker, Martial or Greenwood and Rashford whilst defensively would be for example AWB, new centre back, Maguire, Shaw and Rice.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
11,888
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
I did see those numbers, but from that he seems extremely similar to what we have and I was looking at his unsuccessful touches/dispossessed numbers on whoscored and they were really poor.

Where are your numbers from?

@TheRedHearted
 

PoTMS

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
16,215
The same guys who are being snobby over Rice probably thought Mane, Wijnaldum, Kante etc were bad signings who flattered to deceive. Truth is these players were too good for their current team and needed to jump to the next step up with a better team with the right coaching and direction. Rice is a quality player and I agree with the statement he would get into every Premier League team. He would certainly start in ours.
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
He's in a weird limbo stage right now where he's too good for West Ham but not quite ready for a top team. Whoever gets him is going to have to deal with a steep learning curve but in 2 or 3 years time could have a fantastic holding player.
so Chelsea is a good move for him then?:smirk:
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
11,888
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
The same guys who are being snobby over Rice probably thought Mane, Wijnaldum, Kante etc were bad signings who flattered to deceive. Truth is these players were too good for their current team and needed to jump to the next step up with a better team with the right coaching and direction. Rice is a quality player and I agree with the statement he would get into every Premier League team. He would certainly start in ours.
What are you on about? No one even knew who Kante was.
 

sparx99

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
3,852
The same guys who are being snobby over Rice probably thought Mane, Wijnaldum, Kante etc were bad signings who flattered to deceive. Truth is these players were too good for their current team and needed to jump to the next step up with a better team with the right coaching and direction. Rice is a quality player and I agree with the statement he would get into every Premier League team. He would certainly start in ours.
People fail to contextualise their performances in lesser sides.

E.g. a goalie for a relegation threatened side might have the most saves but not necessarily the most clean sheets because of the volume of shots they face.

Or a young attacker for a lower half side scoring 10 goals in a season is an achievement closer to 20-25 for a top side.

So would Rice play in a different way for Utd vs West Ham? Is his game suited to a team who will have more of the ball than West Ham? Does he have the physical attributes to cover more ground on his own in midfield when we are defending in transition?
 

Bwuk

Full Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
17,281
I like Rice but I think for the touted 70m fee we could upgrade other parts of the side a lot better.
 

BenitoSTARR

One Minute Man
Scout
Joined
Sep 1, 2015
Messages
12,508
He was utterly pedestrian in the two matches we played against Alkmaar last season. You'd think if we were interested, something would have been mentioned by now.
He can only pass to what’s in front of him. Also he was solid on the ball and distributed well in both fixtures. Judging him based on one occasion against a far superior side isn’t exactly the best way to see how he would play for us.
I watched Koop for the first time (other than against us) in his most recent match and was quite disappointed. He's obviously a decent passer although even that he didn't showcase as much as his youtube vids showcase. He did make one good defensive play and one good defence splitting pass, but otherwise he was average. Movement was slow and I got the impression he'd struggle in the much faster PL and the pressing that a lot of teams do. Of course this is based on one match so I could have just caught him on a bad one.
Which match was it? The fact as a DM he’s making defence splitting passes is testament to how good he is. This was on a bad day too.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
11,888
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
I like Rice but I think for the touted 70m fee we could upgrade other parts of the side a lot better.
Precisely the point. There wouldn't be a debate about his efficacy at DM if we were paying 25m for him.
 

PoTMS

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
16,215
Precisely the point. There wouldn't be a debate about his efficacy at DM if we were paying 25m for him.
We've paid £80m for Maguire and £50m for Wan-Bissaka. £70m is good value for Rice in comparison although I think he'll go for ~£50m in the end.
 

passing-wind

Full Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
3,041
The best aspect about rice would be the potential for us to switch to a 3 man midfield allowing another creative midfielder to advance as an 8 alongside Bruno effectively playing a 4-3-3.

Fred and Mctomminay play a double pivot more on the basis of balance to the squad, I don't think we can progress as a team with having them as first team members consistently throughout a season due to the lack of creativity that stems from their influence. I like Scott but he has too many hot and cold performances and the moment Pogba leaves our midfield will need someone with more dynamic passing range to break the lines.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
11,888
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
We've paid £80m for Maguire and £50m for Wan-Bissaka. £70m is good value for Rice in comparison.
Is it feck. We universally agree we overpaid for both, but at the time we needed them. We do not need to spend 70m on Rice.
 

PoTMS

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
16,215
Yup. I don't think we can pay 70m for Rice and then similar amounts for Grealish/Sancho and Haaland. And I would rather spend those amounts for those forwards instead of Rice.
The thing is Haaland will not come to United. He'll have all the clubs in the world fighting for him and I'm not sure he'll choose to come to us. I'm still not sure about Sancho as he's still blowing hot and cold and Dortmund will dig their heels in and be as difficult to deal with as they can after last season's debacle, not forgetting other clubs will also be in the mix for Sancho this time. Grealish is the only one I can see us actually getting but I don't think his signing is as important to improving us as a team as it is signing Rice.
 

PoTMS

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
16,215
Is it feck. We universally agree we overpaid for both, but at the time we needed them. We do not need to spend 70m on Rice.
We quite clearly need a defensive midfielder. Our current lot are not good enough. Matic is our actual only CDM and he's on his last legs. Against anyone decent, he's found wanting and we have to play two defensive minded players in Fred and McTominay to make up for the lack of a quality CDM.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
11,888
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
We quite clearly need a defensive midfielder. Our current lot are not good enough. Matic is on his last legs and against anyone decent, we have to play two defensive minded players in Fred and McTominay to make up for the lack of a quality DM.
We do not need to spend 70m on a defensive midfielder though - no one does for that matter. That pair currently has us top of the league, whilst there's a need to find more of a specialist, it's a ridiculous waste of money.
 

PoTMS

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
16,215
We do not need to spend 70m on a defensive midfielder though - no one does for that matter. That pair currently has us top of the league, whilst there's a need to find more of a specialist, it's a ridiculous waste of money.
I don't think it's a waste of money, because he's much better value than most of the other options out there and importantly he's proven in the league. He's got the benefit of being home grown, English and also only 22. He seems to also have great leadership potential. He could be at United for the rest of his career.

And as the old saying goes, it's not our money. Some may say it takes money away from other places, but I honestly can't see us spending big money on Haaland/Sancho so otherwise the money just gets paid out as dividends into the Glazer's back pocket. Our lack of a CDM specialist is a big reason why we leak so many goals. If it plugs that gap, then why not sign him even if it is at a premium?
 

Olecurls99

Full Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2021
Messages
2,168
Tackles per game
Romeu (3.5), Allan (3.4), Kante (2.9), Phillips (2.9), Hojbjerg (2.8), Fred (2.7), Neves (2.3), Rice (1.9)

Interceptions per game
Kante (2.3), Rice (2.1), Jorginho (1.6), Fred (1.6), Neves (1.6)

Total tackles and interceptions per game
Kante (5.2), Romeu (5), Phillips (4.6), Allan (4.4), Fred (4.3), Hojbjerg (4), Rice (4), Neves (3.9)

Don't these stats prove that we already have the perfect Kante type player in Fred? I've always thought it and these stats back me up. We just need to play him with Pogba or Donny for the perfect balance. I don't know why Ole won't try it.
We play McFred and then wonder why we aren't creative. Play Frogba.
 

andersj

Nick Powell Expert
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Messages
4,274
Location
Copenhagen
I will not pretend I watch every West Ham game, but usually when I do, Rice looks good. And he has done so for a few years.

Statistically, it is hard to say without doing an in depth analysis. And I do not have the numbers to do that. But players who are poor passers are often less involved. As a team, you avoid playing through that player.

McTominay, as an example, makes 33,9 passes per 90 min. That is about 6 % of the passes Man Utd makes on average per 90 min. McTominay completion rate is 86 % in a team with an average of 84 %.

Rice is the player at West Ham with most passes per 90 min. He has an average of 48 per 90 min. That is 12 % of the team average at West Ham. He has a completion rate of 87 % in a team that average 77 %. That is good numbers!

Furthermore, he get the ball into the penalty area a decent amount being a DM at a team like West Ham. This season anyway. He did not do that last year, so it is something he has added to his game. This season he has managed 0,78 passes completed into the box and 0,33 crosses comleted into the box per 90 min (open play only). McTominay, Fred and Matic manage 0,39, 0,69 and 0,70 respectively. Matic, as the only one of these three, has 0,28 crosses completed per 90 min.

I think it is an interesting metric when you look at passing as it is a more difficult pass to do. And it is also an important pass. When you look at who makes the most passes into the penalty area players like KdB, Bruno, Pogba and Trent usually comes out at top.

I think the numbers support my impression from watching West Ham. Rice is not a natural like Scholes. But he is a lot better passer of the ball than McTominay. Probably at a similar level as Fred, maybe even better. And he is a beast of the ball, and young enough to improve.
 

MadDogg

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
15,810
Location
Manchester Utd never lose, just run out of time
Which match was it? The fact as a DM he’s making defence splitting passes is testament to how good he is. This was on a bad day too.
It was the match against Den Haag yesterday. Koop was ok in it, but nothing that really stood out as being good enough to make it in the Premier League, let alone with us. He just seemed a bit lazy in terms of his movement.

Probably the thing that most stood out is he was often slow at moving into position to get the ball. It's one thing that top deep playmakers tend to do well (think Scholes, Carrick, Busquets, Pirlo, etc) that they are always moving to offer themselves as an option to pass to. I'd really want the player we sign to provide that as well, even if he isn't as good on the ball as those players (not many are).

I don't know if that was his normal level or if he's normally better though.
 

DWelbz19

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
33,741
...We know Ole favours 4-2-3-1 and Pogba is off in the summer, our starting #8 options will be Fred and McTominay and perhaps VdB...
That’s a frightening thought. We’d desperately need to sign a Sancho level wide playmaker to compensate.
 

DWelbz19

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
33,741
I think the numbers support my impression from watching West Ham. Rice is not a natural like Scholes. But he is a lot better passer of the ball than McTominay. Probably at a similar level as Fred, maybe even better.
Yeah, that’s great and all, but it’s not like McTominay and Fred are the barometer here. At least one of them should be 12th man type of thing at best. Neither are good enough to be long term starters if we want to stay where we are currently, and actually progress further in Europe. A £70m (odd) replacement who is at a ‘similar level’ to Fred, and a bit better than McTominay is absolutely not what we need.
 

Hawks2008

Full Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
4,912
Location
Melbz
The same guys who are being snobby over Rice probably thought Mane, Wijnaldum, Kante etc were bad signings who flattered to deceive. Truth is these players were too good for their current team and needed to jump to the next step up with a better team with the right coaching and direction. Rice is a quality player and I agree with the statement he would get into every Premier League team. He would certainly start in ours.
Okay but how many of our PL 'proven' signings have been successes? Maguire, Sanchez, AWB, Lukaku (and several others) were all league proven and are not what I would call succesful signings for the money.

PL proven is meaningless, I hope if we decide to spend 70m on a player like Rice we have a reason beyond the fact he played in the PL.
 

renandstimpyfan83

Full Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
600
Location
SNG
Supports
Real Oviedo/England
I will not pretend I watch every West Ham game, but usually when I do, Rice looks good. And he has done so for a few years.

Statistically, it is hard to say without doing an in depth analysis. And I do not have the numbers to do that. But players who are poor passers are often less involved. As a team, you avoid playing through that player.

McTominay, as an example, makes 33,9 passes per 90 min. That is about 6 % of the passes Man Utd makes on average per 90 min. McTominay completion rate is 86 % in a team with an average of 84 %.

Rice is the player at West Ham with most passes per 90 min. He has an average of 48 per 90 min. That is 12 % of the team average at West Ham. He has a completion rate of 87 % in a team that average 77 %. That is good numbers!

Furthermore, he get the ball into the penalty area a decent amount being a DM at a team like West Ham. This season anyway. He did not do that last year, so it is something he has added to his game. This season he has managed 0,78 passes completed into the box and 0,33 crosses comleted into the box per 90 min (open play only). McTominay, Fred and Matic manage 0,39, 0,69 and 0,70 respectively. Matic, as the only one of these three, has 0,28 crosses completed per 90 min.

I think it is an interesting metric when you look at passing as it is a more difficult pass to do. And it is also an important pass. When you look at who makes the most passes into the penalty area players like KdB, Bruno, Pogba and Trent usually comes out at top.

I think the numbers support my impression from watching West Ham. Rice is not a natural like Scholes. But he is a lot better passer of the ball than McTominay. Probably at a similar level as Fred, maybe even better. And he is a beast of the ball, and young enough to improve.
Great post. He’s a terrific young player and has so much potential. He’s a proper leader who’s only just turned 22, has everything you’d want from a number 6 and is capable of playing at CB.

It’s a cliche but if he were called Diego Arroz and was doing the same thing at Sociedad people would be drooling over him.

£70m for a nailed on 100+ cap future England captain is a no brainer to me. United will regret it if they let Chelsea sign him instead.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
11,888
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
I don't think it's a waste of money, because he's much better value than most of the other options out there and importantly he's proven in the league. He's got the benefit of being home grown, English and also only 22. He seems to also have great leadership potential. He could be at United for the rest of his career.

And as the old saying goes, it's not our money. Some may say it takes money away from other places, but I honestly can't see us spending big money on Haaland/Sancho so otherwise the money just gets paid out as dividends into the Glazer's back pocket. Our lack of a CDM specialist is a big reason why we leak so many goals. If it plugs that gap, then why not sign him even if it is at a premium?
This is just demonstrably not true. There are players all over Europe who do his role as well or better, or more potential. Even Camavinga would cost less than that, arguably one of the biggest talents in world football.

Well by all accounts we went for Sancho, so not sure what you mean. I personally am of the opinion he's more of a CB and there's no guarantee he could step up and produce what we're expecting, so 70m on the chance he will seems a terrible investment. Considering as well, pretty much no other team I can think of, that's been successful has invested that sort of money in a specialist DM.
 

MadDogg

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
15,810
Location
Manchester Utd never lose, just run out of time
We quite clearly need a defensive midfielder. Our current lot are not good enough. Matic is our actual only CDM and he's on his last legs. Against anyone decent, he's found wanting and we have to play two defensive minded players in Fred and McTominay to make up for the lack of a quality CDM.
There's nothing wrong with playing two defensive minded players together at the base of a 4231, the issue is that they need to provide more on the ball than what McTominay in particular does. Being more focused on the defensive side doesn't mean that they can't also provide quite a lot when we have the ball, they'll just probably do it from a deeper area. Fred is just about good enough, but it's ridiculous that we're relying on him being our main ball-player in central midfield most of the time since he's being partnered with Scott. We really need both players in there to be at least as good as Fred with their passing and movement, and preferably at least one of them should be quite a bit better.

I'd expect we'll still play Fred or McTominay (hopefully the former much more often) quite regularly next to the new guy even if we do sign one.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
11,888
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
Great post. He’s a terrific young player and has so much potential. He’s a proper leader who’s only just turned 22, has everything you’d want from a number 6 and is capable of playing at CB.

It’s a cliche but if he were called Diego Arroz and was doing the same thing at Sociedad people would be drooling over him.
But no one would be saying we should be paying 70m for him either.
 

andersj

Nick Powell Expert
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Messages
4,274
Location
Copenhagen
Yeah, that’s great and all, but it’s not like McTominay and Fred are the barometer here. At least one of them should be 12th man type of thing at best. Neither are good enough to be long term starters if we want to stay where we are currently, and actually progress further in Europe. A £70m (odd) replacement who is at a ‘similar level’ to Fred, and a bit better than McTominay is absolutely not what we need.
If he is at similar level on the ball as Fred is his a lot better overall. Off the ball Fred is weak tactically (always reactive, chasing the ball, not focusing on areas of danger) and not very suited to protecting a back four. He is suspect to make mistakes on our own third and dues to his size he can be bullied quite a lot (he gets dribled a lot). In my opinion, both Fred and McTominay would thrive of playing next to a mobile #6 with pace. Neither of them is really suited to that. They are better a bit higher up when they can move more freely.
 

renandstimpyfan83

Full Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
600
Location
SNG
Supports
Real Oviedo/England
But no one would be saying we should be paying 70m for him either.
Well, yeah, mostly because of the “unproven in the PL” thing so it’s swings and roundabouts I suppose.

£70m is about the equivalent of £25m in 2005. It’s just inflation. If you look at it that way, it’s not a bad price for him at all.


If he is at similar level on the ball as Fred is his a lot better overall. Off the ball Fred is weak tactically (always reactive, chasing the ball, not focusing on areas of danger) and not very suited to protecting a back four. He is suspect to make mistakes on our own third and dues to his size he can be bullied quite a lot (he gets dribled a lot). In my opinion, both Fred and McTominay would thrive of playing next to a mobile #6 with pace. Neither of them is really suited to that. They are better a bit higher up when they can move more freely.
From watching a lot of the both of them, Rice is a much better passer than Fred in my opinion (and is consistently improving that part of his game while being 6 years younger).
 

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
Exactly right and this my constant argument as if we had a pure out and out defensive midfielder like when we had Keane in his later years or Hargreaves it would mean we could play BOTH Fernandes and Pogba (if he stays) together and let them do their thing further forward.

Pogba will always drop deep and use his range of passing but he is NOT a defensive deep lying playmaker like a Pirlo or Xavi or Carrick all were so Pogba needs someone who has the mobility and stamina to cover all that ground needed (which Matic can’t do anymore) and shield the defence properly.

In having someone like Rice and a pacey yet not injury prone centre back like Konate we’d actually have a solid platform to go all out on teams that park the bus without fear of getting caught on the counter attack, Rice covers all ground in front of the defence whilst Konate who’s just an example rather than me saying he’s the solution has the pace to cover in behind Maguire just like Bailly is currently doing.

If we were then to sign a quality right sided attacker we’d have a perfectly balanced team which going forward would be for example Fernandes, Pogba, right sided attacker, Martial or Greenwood and Rashford whilst defensively would be for example AWB, new centre back, Maguire, Shaw and Rice.
Yeah, i think to put down Rice for not being this amazing passer on the ball needs to be relaxed, its not the type of CDM he is.

Rice is more a player that brings the attacking freedom & abilities to others rather than being the creator himself.

He is still a relatively young player for a down and dirty role aswell so you hope players like Carrick can help bring the well roundes best out of him too.

I also think when watching Matic that he drops to create a back 3 whilst letting everyone else attack. I can see Rice doing this and having 2 ball playing CB's long term next to him which covers that need for a deeply lying playmaker instead.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.