croadyman
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2018
- Messages
- 27,425
Personally I feel we need both,however if we can only sign one this summer which is it
What do you mean by a mobile no 8?Personally I feel we need both,however if we can only sign one this summer which is it
Someone like Caicedo who could partner Casa in the big games,whereas playmaker is people like De Jong (obviously not him)What do you mean by a mobile no 8?
We need both. We need midfielders who are going to elevate our play in the build up phase.Someone like Caicedo
Feel free to put forward targets tooDeep lying playmaker for sure. The issue of playmaking far outweighs mobility. To put it simply Eriksen and Bruno perform the role of a mobile 8 better than Casemeiro does that of a deep playmaker. You cannot simply have him in the deeper role and expect to control games - his passing isn’t good enough.
World's best team seem to have one .I think mobile no.8 is ball carrier type box-to-box, ala kovacic, Modric, or FDJ.
Highest ball carrier stats in Europe is obviously FDJ, (which is the cream of the crop, if we can get him, it would be perfect) and then Rice isn't that very far behind.
I'd go all in for Rice if we have new owners. Casemiro can play double role of DLP and anchorman as he shown against Brentford. Rice can be the dynamic ball carrier plus he has better defensive qualities than FDJ.
Tactically DLP is rarity nowadays, I'd rather we go for modern all action ball carrier no.8.
It’s definitely a niche position. Ideally you want all your CMs to be capable of taking the ball from the back, breaking the oppositions high press and starting attacks, clearly not everyone is capable of it but it doesn’t necessarily have to be exclusive to a DLP. Kovacic for example is a perfect example of someone capable of it and he is just a regular 6.World's best team seem to have one .
Oh I agree it's quite a niche position and as long as your teams midfielders are competent enough to evade press and don't completely shit bed in deeper positions there are different combinations which can work just fine .It’s definitely a niche position. Ideally you want all your CMs to be capable of taking the ball from the back, breaking the oppositions high press and starting attacks, clearly not everyone is capable of it but it doesn’t necessarily have to be exclusive to a DLP. Kovacic for example is a perfect example of someone capable of it and he is just a regular 6.
I would agree, as that would allow Case to play as more of the 8 in the build up phase, which would nullify his composure problems and ideally give him more time and space.We need both. We need midfielders who are going to elevate our play in the build up phase.
It's absolutely vital to sign midfielders who are deep lying playmakers or deep lying pressure evaders or a deep roaming playmaker.
The solution is required in the deeper area of midfield.
Agreed.I would agree, as that would allow Case to play as more of the 8 in the build up phase, which would nullify his composure problems and ideally give him more time and space.
Well caught the highlights of Juve v Sevilla and Rabiot can definitely move with the ball,however don't know what his playmaker abilities are likeA deep playmaker who is press resistant and can move with the ball. We have no dribblers in midfield
He probably was but that boat sailed last summerIt would be good if someone can find that Twitter list someone made on midfielders. I’m sure De Jong was number one of best all round attributes with Kovacic and Rice having a similar statistical shape.
So either of those two. But I don’t like Kovacic and we aren’t getting Rice![]()
There was a TIFO IR L episode on youtube where they used a stats based pizza chart to show the strengths of erikson and casemiro. Then they overlayed frenkie stats on the combined pizza chart and you had the perfect midfield in terms of all of the strengths required by your midfield trio combined.It would be good if someone can find that Twitter list someone made on midfielders. I’m sure De Jong was number one of best all round attributes with Kovacic and Rice having a similar statistical shape.
So either of those two. But I don’t like Kovacic and we aren’t getting Rice![]()
Think we could but see him joining ArsenalThere was a TIFO IR L episode on youtube where they used a stats based pizza chart to show the strengths of erikson and casemiro. Then they overlayed frenkie stats on the combined pizza chart and you had the perfect midfield in terms of all of the strengths required by your midfield trio combined.
We arent going to get rice, just too expensive.
Arsenal would make sense for him. Doesnt have to move house, still stay in london and has a better chance currently of winning the league with them than us (at present).Think we could but see him joining Arsenal
Casemiro becomes like that, most probably because our forwards are impotent and he was instructed by EtH. He wasn't like this in his whole successful Madrid career.Bruno is an all-action midfielder, and Casemiro has surprisingly proven to be somewhat the same, coming forward and being a threat in the area. That means we don't need another dynamic runner badly. We need someone who can dictate the play and string passing moves together. Our football is pretty chaotic at times and the midfielder we should target should be someone who can make it more structured.
Frenkie ain't gonna be cheaper than Rice ffs.There was a TIFO IR L episode on youtube where they used a stats based pizza chart to show the strengths of erikson and casemiro. Then they overlayed frenkie stats on the combined pizza chart and you had the perfect midfield in terms of all of the strengths required by your midfield trio combined.
We arent going to get rice, just too expensive.
I know, but he is clearly capable.Casemiro becomes like that, most probably because our forwards are impotent and he was instructed by EtH. He wasn't like this in his whole successful Madrid career.
Obviously. It's just our midfield structure become less "structure" if he does it so often in game. Especially when he's the sole DM and partnering Eriksen.I know, but he is clearly capable.
Agreed, that’s why I suggested we should target a more stationary playmaker a la Neves rather than a dynamic midfielder a la Caicedo.Obviously. It's just our midfield structure become less "structure" if he does it so often in game. Especially when he's the sole DM and partnering Eriksen.
I don't think it should be a factor. I kinda like a roaming playmaker ala Modric (or Kroos, Gundogan) who can cover bigger area of the pitch. Although a deep lying playmaker (ala old Scholes) is good also.Agreed, that’s why I suggested we should target a more stationary playmaker a la Neves rather than a dynamic midfielder a la Caicedo.
He was like that at Santos though, it might be that he was only keen on shackling himself for players like Kroos and Modric and he wanted to be more expressive in the last phase of his career.Casemiro becomes like that, most probably because our forwards are impotent and he was instructed by EtH. He wasn't like this in his whole successful Madrid career.
Yeah. Probably so. He went forward often with Brazil in last WC also. And probably cost Brazil in that game against Croatia (I think).He was like that at Santos though, it might be that he was only keen on shackling himself for players like Kronos and Modric and he wanted to be more expressive in the last phase of his career.
He actually started doing it a lot in his last season at madrid. Kroos and Modric would sit at times and Casemiro would be the one bombing forward.Casemiro becomes like that, most probably because our forwards are impotent and he was instructed by EtH. He wasn't like this in his whole successful Madrid career.
thats incorrect Fred bombing forward to croatia touch line chasing a 50/50 ball he lost, cost them. Casemiro then had to step forward to kill the counter and once it was by him it was game over. But i would blame Fred on that one as he was brought on to close up shop and be defensively disruptive and not chase another goal.Yeah. Probably so. He went forward often with Brazil in last WC also. And probably cost Brazil in that game against Croatia (I think).
It just seems like him decided to do playmaking and then all action CM is kinda out of character, when he rarely did that in 9 seasons with Madrid.
He probably will be. Frenkie de Jong earns nearly twice as much as the next on the salary list in Barcelona and selling him could be massive for Barcelona in terms of regaining a bit of financial control. They're not going to demand £100m as long as he has that salary (€721,154)Frenkie ain't gonna be cheaper than Rice ffs.
Its crazy that we had both at starters,now we can't find just the one 1.We need two midfielders that can control the game and have great passing range. Guys similar to Carrick or Scholes. Without that, we are not going to get any better. Doesn't matter how many strikers or defenders we sign. We've had big name strikers before and we were still mediocre. The number one reason we are where we are is because we cannot control games to save our lives. We lose every midfield battle.