Dansk
Full Member
- Joined
- May 7, 2017
- Messages
- 1,427
They've doped, but that is not the sole reason for their success. City's success is purely down to Pep. They'd be 25 points a year worse off without him, and there won't be this cold consistency. He's the SAF of the modern era and they will be untouchable till he sticks around.
Spending money alone won't get clubs anywhere. Just look at Chelsea this year, or United over the last decade. They can have 20 Haalands and De Bruynes in their team and it wont matter. Don't take the credit out of Pep people.
Funny, I don't recall them being mid-table up until his arrival. I recall a team already winning the title every other year, and then he gave them that final edge. By no stretch of the imagination does he "elevate them by 25 points." I mean, that's just not the case. It's a statement that can be dismissed out of hand because we can see how many points they got in the seasons leading up to his arrival.
He's not the modern-day SAF. He's more like the F1 racer who's on the team with the fastest car. He still has to be a competent driver, he still has to know what he's doing; but he basically wins by default because his car is the fastest, as long as he isn't so inept at the job that a faster car doesn't make you win. He probably wouldn't be the one who can race for a team with a less powerful car and win. It's even possible that he's the best racer currently in the F1, but does it mean he's the best racer there has ever been? If he's only good enough at racing to get the car to go 5% faster than the average racer, but wins because that makes him unbeatable, is he better than the racer who's so skilled that he makes his car go 20% faster than anyone else could but is on a team whose car isn't as fast on its own?
I've never been impressed with Pep. I don't think he'd succeed at any club that isn't already the favorite to win. Whenever he hasn't been that - in the CL, notably - he hasn't done particularly well except for his time at Barcelona where that team would have won it all with a chimpanzee as head coach. Meanwhile, SAF did the impossible at Aberdeen, and then came to United when we were nowhere even slightly near the top and elevated the club to the absolute peak. To say Pep is comparable to that is so idiotic and absurd that it cannot possibly be taken seriously. Pep has never done much more than what you'd expect of the club with the best players in the league, and when it comes to his European record, he has actually done rather poorly since he left the cheat code that was Messi/Iniesta/Xavi.
Last edited: