matbezlima
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2019
- Messages
- 388
Do you think that Messi could become an Iniesta-like player in the future, changing his style again to accomodate an even greater loss of pure agility and pace in the future?
ThisHe’s already spent his entire career better at being Iniesta than Andres Iniesta is.
Peak Messi under Pep and Tito was no slouch energy wiseI think people underestimate how much energy Xavi and Iniesta brought to each game. Current Messi runs less than any other footballer I have seen so I think it would be hard for him to replicate what Iniesta was doing in midfield.
I agree but it feels like current Messi walks through games which is a testament to how good he is.Peak Messi under Pep and Tito was no slouch energy wise
I’d disagree with that Messi wasn’t even in match’s 10-15 mins at a time under Pep then came up with some magic and got a goal.. Xavi and Iniesta would play with the ball all the time.Peak Messi under Pep and Tito was no slouch energy wise
I guess it's a case of why expend more energy than you need to.I agree but it feels like current Messi walks through games which is a testament to how good he is.
Eh, just because you're not sprinting or actively running around doesn't mean you're not moving. Watching Messi floats around constantly, and when they have the ball or make decisive movements such as a sprint or run, it's usually in a very threatening way such as dribble towards goal, the endline, trying to make an angle or space for a pass/shot, etc.I agree but it feels like current Messi walks through games which is a testament to how good he is.
He wasn't as involved in the general game as Xavi and Iniesta was, but he was absolutely mobile. Dropping deep into midfield to receive the ball, playing on either wing... There's been a noticeable decline in mobility even from that nowadays but I don't think you see much drop rate if for some reason Iniesta was unavailable, and you asked Messi to forget about goalscoring and focus on replicating what Iniesta did.I’d disagree with that Messi wasn’t even in match’s 10-15 mins at a time under Pep then came up with some magic and got a goal.. Xavi and Iniesta would play with the ball all the time.
He's gotten worse in recent years I absolutely agree.I agree but it feels like current Messi walks through games which is a testament to how good he is.
Iniesta is a bit shafted regarding stats... He was extremely vital on the pitch but usually provided the assist to the assist or had a key dribble that freed up 3 players in front of him.Do you mean remain the same player just without the productivity? Sure.
This. Messi to become a Iniesta kind of player seems to me would have to run like twice as much each game. When messi isn't attacking he just walks around saving much stamina through the game. Does anybody knows where to find statistics about total distance coveree per game?I think people underestimate how much energy Xavi and Iniesta brought to each game. Current Messi runs less than any other footballer I have seen so I think it would be hard for him to replicate what Iniesta was doing in midfield.
Hey definitely does, but it's an energy conservation tactic. It's how he can still produce those short bursts of speed at 33. Same thing Ronaldo does.I agree but it feels like current Messi walks through games which is a testament to how good he is.
can you post this on Reddit?Do you think that Messi could become an Iniesta-like player in the future, changing his style again to accomodate an even greater loss of pure agility and pace in the future?
Bingo.He’s already spent his entire career better at being Iniesta than Andres Iniesta is.
True. But that's something he changed over time. 5 years (or more) back he definitely used to buzz around the pitch making recoveries. Somewhere down the line he decided to shift his focus and conserve energy wherever he could.Iniesta buzzed around the pitch hassling players and putting in leg work too.
As some have said Messi is just Messi. He does none of the leg work and rightly so. We’ve seen his form fall off slightly this season no doubt but he is still the best in the world by a large margin when he’s on the ball.
The problem is Barcelona have to completely build the team around his lack of movement off the ball. They defend with a man less which I feel harms them in bigger games personally. Especially if you stuck him in midfield were Iniesta played.
It's true, similarly how Hazard at Chelsea would "cheat" on the LW and do pretty much no tracking back and have full stamina ready to counter attack.A friend of mine went to a game at the Nou Camp last year and he said Messi stood, or walked about for the vast majority of the game but every single time he ran or got on the ball, he was effective.
He said he'd never seen anything like it. He was totally uninvolved for 80+ minutes but the 5 minutes or so he played ball would fill a highlights reel.
I posted in the Daily Discussion a few days agocan you post this on Reddit?
I read recently that Messi had the lowest amount of movement on the pitch out of all the outfield players in Europe's top flight leagues over the last few years. Obviously when he does run he is incredible effective, but his movement is certainly less than everyone else.Eh, just because you're not sprinting or actively running around doesn't mean you're not moving. Watching Messi floats around constantly, and when they have the ball or make decisive movements such as a sprint or run, it's usually in a very threatening way such as dribble towards goal, the endline, trying to make an angle or space for a pass/shot, etc.
No need to run just to run. He's smart enough to know when to close down, when/where to go into space, and when to walk or jog into space while conserving energy.
Rooney was shot by the time he was tried in midfield - he was forced there simply because he wasn't good enough in attack.I know Messi is a better player but this debate is similar to the Rooney debate.
I think Rooney was a class player but he wasn't a good midfielder he was average at best in that role. Messi is obviously a better player but he's played out his career as an attacking player he won't have the game knowledge to switch positions and be the same player in that new role.
Yeah I agree with that. It’s gonna be sad when he hangs up his boots.True. But that's something he changed over time. 5 years (or more) back he definitely used to buzz around the pitch making recoveries. Somewhere down the line he decided to shift his focus and conserve energy wherever he could.