JustinC00
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
- Messages
- 3,246
Makes no sense whatsoever, unless you admit that United SUCKS at negotiations.
jog on
Makes no sense whatsoever, unless you admit that United SUCKS at negotiations.
Ederson is at 2m a year at Atalanta, Rashford is at 19m. We aren't going to have the same trouble getting rid of Ugarte or Zirkzee who are on lower wages. Onana, Rashford, Mount, Sancho (now gone thankfully) were inherited from the previous regime.Ederson - United paying / paid £38m
Rashford - United unable to sell for £25m
Ederson - plays for Atalanta in SerieA, an extremely weak league, is not part of Brazil national team, no EPL experience. Is a defensive player, so typically should be cheaper than goal-scoring attackers, of even the same quality
Rashford - Part of an extremely competitive England World Cup team, that the likes of Cole Palmer didnt make. 13 goals and 11 assists for Barcelona! Only behind Yamal (31), and Lopez (25), ahead of Raphina (18), Torres (17), and Lewa (15), none of which would be sold for less than 80-90M, even Lewa probably at least 60-70.
Makes no sense whatsoever, unless you admit that United SUCKS at negotiations.
It makes plenty of sense when you understand that teams care about the total cost of a player, not the transfer fee. Fee and wages are all bucketed together.Ederson - United paying / paid £38m
Rashford - United unable to sell for £25m
Ederson - plays for Atalanta in SerieA, an extremely weak league, is not part of Brazil national team, no EPL experience. Is a defensive player, so typically should be cheaper than goal-scoring attackers, of even the same quality
Rashford - Part of an extremely competitive England World Cup team, that the likes of Cole Palmer didnt make. 13 goals and 11 assists for Barcelona! Only behind Yamal (31), and Lopez (25), ahead of Raphina (18), Torres (17), and Lewa (15), none of which would be sold for less than 80-90M, even Lewa probably at least 60-70.
Makes no sense whatsoever, unless you admit that United SUCKS at negotiations.
45 million euros total fee for a player with a one year contract, if I extrapolate that if he had like 3 years left on his deal, you'd look at something like 70+ million euros. Don't think he's that player.What wouldn't you consider a hefty fee then?
Another odd situation where we could have signed him next year, especially if we are going to sign two more midfielders. Unless we are being very ambitious. But if we can’t sign a bigger target and it’s due to 15-20 million wouldn’t we look at ederson and say oh well wish we had our number one target?45 million euros total fee for a player with a one year contract, if I extrapolate that if he had like 3 years left on his deal, you'd look at something like 70+ million euros. Don't think he's that player.
Even on a longer contract I'd be surprised if he'd cost more than 50 million euros..
However, I'm happy we have a midfield signing and think he has the mentality and physique to do well in the PL.
45 million euros total fee for a player with a one year contract, if I extrapolate that if he had like 3 years left on his deal, you'd look at something like 70+ million euros. Don't think he's that player.
Even on a longer contract I'd be surprised if he'd cost more than 50 million euros..
However, I'm happy we have a midfield signing and think he has the mentality and physique to do well in the PL.
That's a valid point but I think you're underestimating the current side and overestimating the old one
You are making some good points, but I strongly suspect Ederson will be at least on £150K, definitely not as low as £80It makes plenty of sense when you understand that teams care about the total cost of a player, not the transfer fee. Fee and wages are all bucketed together.
Imagine you think Rashford is worth £80M and Ederson is worth £55M over the next 4 years. That's the most you'll pay all in. Well, Rashford is on £325k a week, and doesn't want a paycut. Even if you can negotiate him down to £250k a week on his new deal, that's still £52M over 4 years. So that means you'll only pay up to a £28M transfer fee so you cap your total investment at £80M.
Ederson is reportedly on £40k a week at Atalanta. Let's say United offers to double him to £80k a week; that's £17M over 4 years. So you can pay up to £38M in transfer fee for him.
This is how teams actually value players btw.All-in is what counts, and usually the lower the wages the more you'll pay in fee. Overpaid players aren't going to get much at all in transfer fees, to the point where the most overpaid you may have to pay teams to take them off your hands (bc you'd save all their wages).
I mean, you can't just take out the results you don't like.Is he now ? That 20/21 side was frightening...
If not for the awful start to the season which was due to the non-existent vacation the players got, that team would have fought for the title.
7 points from the first 6 games - but after that we lost once in 28 games. 18 wins, 9 draws and one defeat. Goal difference of 55-22 in those 28 games. Some of the counter attacks that team had was scary
Would you feel better if we paid more for the same level of player who has more years left on his contract?Another odd situation where we could have signed him next year, especially if we are going to sign two more midfielders. Unless we are being very ambitious. But if we can’t sign a bigger target and it’s due to 15-20 million wouldn’t we look at ederson and say oh well wish we had our number one target?
What makes him unsuited to the EPL in your view?I am afraid he is a mediocre at the best and not suited for EPL
find it weird how people are annoyed at securing an Ugarte replacement for 35m early June
We are losing Cas as well. We should be annoyed if the player seems technically suspect.find it weird how people are annoyed at securing an Ugarte replacement for 35m early June
I said this last week, I am still unconvinced on Ederson as a starter, also not sure if he is an improvement on Ugarte but hopefully he is better, I think we still need to sign 2 new midfielders that can slot into the starting lineup behind Bruno (one of them is a competition for Mainoo), that way we have 4 covering 2 spots.£35m is not that high.
I am not sure about him at all, but I am very hopeful he's of good quality, even as a squad option he has to be of certain level where his presence isn't a significant drop from the starter, Ugarte was a liability when he came on so hopefully he is at least not a liability.
But if he is one of the main 2 midfield signings then it's worrying
Seems a much better deal than Mason Mount who had one year left.45m euros in total with add ons doesn't sound bad. But then you remember he's got 1 year left on his contract and it's tad annoying.
The point would still stand at £150k. But I'd be surprised if it's that high. That's around what Sesko, Mbeumo, and Cunha got. If he's a squad player, I suspect £80k - 100k.You are making some good points, but I strongly suspect Ederson will be at least on £150K, definitely not as low as £80
But it’s not been suggested in any way shape or form that this is the only midfield singing?We are losing Cas as well. We should be annoyed if the player seems technically suspect.
Rashford is on 300-350 k wages a week for next 2 years , United may suck at negotiations but damage was already done and you don't exactly see Line of suitors for Rashford even at that fee despite his all positives you have mentioned I wonder why .
I would feel better if we got priorities over the line first.Would you feel better if we paid more for the same level of player who has more years left on his contract?
With Casemiro and Ugarte going, We needed to sign 3 midfielders that can contribute at a high level and we managed to get one of them for £34m. That's all that matters.
The July thing seems odd to me too. Why not just get it done? I know there's a world cup coming up but we've signed players before world cups. Remember Jaap Stam in 98?Can anyone say why this would be finished in July? Can't remember if other signings have already finalised by the way.
Pretty sure the figure I've seen reported it £28/29m for Ugarte, we have a limited market due to his wages.If we can shift Ugarte for £30m-£35m then happy with this. Seems like a decent squad option and floor raiser from what people are saying.
Came to say the same. Early deal in a position we desperately need bodies for a reasonable price. Beautiful to seeGood to see us actually doing business early for a change.