Eight Brazilian players might be ineligible to play this weekend

Wednesday at Stoke

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
21,666
Location
Copenhagen
Supports
Time Travel
It is fecking ridiculous to play nation international game like the past during pandemic.
The problem like cross infection, quarantine etc cannot be solved during this period and the clubs have no voluntary to release the players longer for their quarantine to play just one/two national games monthly.
Why FIFA cannot coordinate with all league association to change the fixture. For example, to shorten the league fixture within 8~9 months, then play the national game within 1-2 months and take the rest/quarantine in 1 month.
It will be more effective to run the game during pandemic.
These are the qualifiers for the world cup in the summer, not friendlies. If anything, they could have organized them in a neutral venue bubble in a green lit country.
 

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,557
I'm not Fred's biggest fan, but this can also be argued the other way round. McT's best performances have come playing along side Fred and he's generally poor when partnered with someone else. Basically, the two of them need each other.
Which is the problem, neither are good enough on their own to do a job. The bottom line is, if either one play, they are very very inconsistent. Unfortunately, Matic is just as inconsistent so one of them has to play.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Which is the problem, neither are good enough on their own to do a job. The bottom line is, if either one play, they are very very inconsistent. Unfortunately, Matic is just as inconsistent so one of them has to play.
Or neither of them have another proper midfield player to partner them at the club?
 

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,557
Or neither of them have another proper midfield player to partner them at the club?
Yeah, I get that too. You have to admit though, neither are top class midfielders who can do what we need in the middle.

We either need a destroyer who will mop everything up ala Ndidi, Fabinho, Fernandinho, Kante or we need a ball playing DM like Jorginho, Rodri, Veratti.
 

Dave Smith

Full Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2019
Messages
2,509
Supports
Anything anti-Dipper
If it means the Dippers cannot play Alisson, Fabinho and Firmino, I am all for this.
 

BBRBB

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
3,149
Supports
Paris Saint-Germain
Joke of a punishment.
You have to add hefty fines on top for it to have any effect.
 

RobinLFC

Cries when Liverpool doesn't get praised
Joined
May 20, 2014
Messages
20,892
Location
Belgium
Supports
Liverpool

What a mess.

Sky Sports News understands Liverpool believe that, due to the circumstances surrounding the ongoing Coronavirus pandemic and the quarantine measures players would have had to face upon their return to the UK had they travelled, FIFA has no foundation with which to stop the players from being selected by their clubs this weekend.
I really hope we have a better legal reasoning than "errr PANDEMIC" if we're gonna field Alisson and Fabinho without resolving the issue beforehand.
 

Daonico

Full Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2020
Messages
265
Location
Uruguay

What a mess.



I really hope we have a better legal reasoning than "errr PANDEMIC" if we're gonna field Alisson and Fabinho without resolving the issue beforehand.
I don't think the clubs have a way of out this one with that argument, I think it is mostly setting the battleground for the next international break
Clubs purposedly/intentionally/knwoingly broke the rules, it would be a joke if they don't get the punishment after the federations presented the complaint. It was surely a calculated risk, given that the players would have faced 14 days isolation if they had come, against a 5 day ban if they didn't...
I understand both the NTs and the clubs in this, hope a better arrangement is achieved for the next breaks.
 

UweBein

Creator of the Worst Analogy on the Internet.
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
3,729
Location
Köln
Supports
Chelsea
I don't think the clubs have a way of out this one with that argument, I think it is mostly setting the battleground for the next international break
Clubs purposedly/intentionally/knwoingly broke the rules, it would be a joke if they don't get the punishment after the federations presented the complaint. It was surely a calculated risk, given that the players would have faced 14 days isolation if they had come, against a 5 day ban if they didn't...
I understand both the NTs and the clubs in this, hope a better arrangement is achieved for the next breaks.
Legally, the clubs do not have a problem to fight this.
There is no way that FIFA can actually enforce that in the UK.

The question is rather whether the FA would try to enforce possible punishments in the UK?
 

Daonico

Full Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2020
Messages
265
Location
Uruguay
Legally, the clubs do not have a problem to fight this.
There is no way that FIFA can actually enforce that in the UK.

The question is rather whether the FA would try to enforce possible punishments in the UK?
The FAs are associated with FIFA, they are under FIFA rules, that's why football rules are mostly the same everywhere...
Of course the clubs can try to force FIFA's arm as much as possible, given they clearly have power, threaten with the superleague again or whatever... but the rules or legal ground is there, clubs must release the players, they didn't, they can't act surprised now
 

paraguayo

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 24, 2019
Messages
1,339
Supports
neutral
It's FIFA mate. As I mentioned the other day, they once got the Brazilian government to show up with the federal police at the Uruguay camp and deport Suarez because he bit a rival player. They didn't just suspend him and ban him from stadiums (???) and being present at the Uruguay training camp (????), they actually got him kicked out of the country altogether. In what planet that makes any sense?

They are used to having their way, and in this context it was bound to happen that the (different) Brazilian authorities would find a very public way to put their foot down and shaft them 5 mins into a much anticipated globally-viewed fixture.
there is no source on suarez being deported. all i see is that fifa removed his credentials to go to stadium and team hotel
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
52,990
Liverpool believing something doesn't apply to them?

I will not have it!
 

UweBein

Creator of the Worst Analogy on the Internet.
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
3,729
Location
Köln
Supports
Chelsea
The FAs are associated with FIFA, they are under FIFA rules, that's why football rules are mostly the same everywhere...
Of course the clubs can try to force FIFA's arm as much as possible, given they clearly have power, threaten with the superleague again or whatever... but the rules or legal ground is there, clubs must release the players, they didn't, they can't act surprised now
What happens if Liverpool challenge that in a proper court in UK?
 

Nero

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2008
Messages
3,286
They are punishing their own players by not letting them play.
 

Daonico

Full Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2020
Messages
265
Location
Uruguay
What happens if Liverpool challenge that in a proper court in UK?
you mean outside football? Well I am not lawyer so I don't know, but I would say a court outside football has nothing to do in this case... I am not sure where are you going to... what would the grounds be?
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,171
Location
Montevideo
there is no source on suarez being deported. all i see is that fifa removed his credentials to go to stadium and team hotel
The federal police showed up at the team hotel to instrument it. They removed his credentials, made him pack his bags on the spot, removed him from the hotel, and escorted him to an airport from which he flew back to Uruguay (yes, there's a plane waiting for him, one he clearly hadn't booked for).

There's photos of all that, albeit not the easiest to google 7 years later (I just keep getting hits of the latest issue).

If that's not deportation I don't know what is. They could argue it wasn't official, that it was an invitation to leave (or else), but it sure as feck wasn't a voluntary or planned action.

He wasn't even allowed to train with Barca or go to the Nou Camp until around September, it wasn't even limited to the World Cup. Completely lost the plot, more so than Suárez did himself (which takes some doing).
 

Chairman Steve

Full Member
Joined
May 9, 2018
Messages
7,046
Why didn’t you just ask for compensation from the clubs? Or the English government who are the ones enforcing the rules? I’m willing to bet these guys wanted to play and had to be talked out of it like Cavani, because massive COVID risk and remember who’s paying you etc
 

Dave Smith

Full Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2019
Messages
2,509
Supports
Anything anti-Dipper
Liverpool believing something doesn't apply to them?

I will not have it!
Problem is they'll break the rules then any fine/punishment will be applicable to all English clubs.
 

diarm

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2014
Messages
16,713
This row is going to make for a challenging t-shirt design.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,171
Location
Montevideo
No worries. Let them go next time, just on charge wages for all games missed to the Brazilian FA and watch them pipe the feck down real quick.
Wages this, wages that.

That's the deal, players get released for internationals, always has been. The only new thing is the government decided to extend player unavailability. Your government, your problem, just like with taxes. Clubs don't have a leg to stand on there.

Brazil triggering the 5-day punishment makes it all more controversial, but the entire business model behind FIFA and int'l competitions is anchored on players having to be available for certain tournos and their qualifiers.
 

Peter van der Gea

Likes Pineapple on well done Steak
Joined
Feb 17, 2018
Messages
3,691
Wages this, wages that.

That's the deal, players get released for internationals, always has been. The only new thing is the government decided to extend player unavailability. Your government, your problem, just like with taxes. Clubs don't have a leg to stand on there.

Brazil triggering the 5-day punishment makes it all more controversial, but the entire business model behind FIFA and int'l competitions is anchored on players having to be available for certain tournos and their qualifiers.
I think pretty early on it was getting obvious that some, if not all countries were going to quarantine, Fifa should have planned for that.

Asking hundreds of players and staff to do international round trips, repeatedly, is crazy.
 

Redlyn

Full Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2011
Messages
3,682
Wages this, wages that.

That's the deal, players get released for internationals, always has been. The only new thing is the government decided to extend player unavailability. Your government, your problem, just like with taxes. Clubs don't have a leg to stand on there.

Brazil triggering the 5-day punishment makes it all more controversial, but the entire business model behind FIFA and int'l competitions is anchored on players having to be available for certain tournos and their qualifiers.
It's everyone's problem. All 3 parties involved (club, player, NT).
If a government decides for national health reasons to quarantine that's their perogative. The clubs have decided not to release their players under the circumstances. I think going forward they will still prefer to take the 5 day hit rather than the 14 day one. Everyone just trying to do whats best for themselves with no easy solutions if government wont change their policy.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,171
Location
Montevideo
I think pretty early on it was getting obvious that some, if not all countries were going to quarantine, Fifa should have planned for that.
It's just the UK though, isn't it? Agree with the point anyway, they spent the whole 2020/21 season cancelling fixtures and it was clearly going to catch up with everyone at some point.

In Conmebol's case, once the Copa in Colombia/Argentina was cancelled they could have had more qualifiers instead of setting one up in a rush in Brazil. Of course, no Conmebol FA would have voted that.

Asking hundreds of players and staff to do international round trips, repeatedly, is crazy.
Have you heard about any plans to scrap the CL, EL and Conference League? Why not?
 

Hastar

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 2, 2021
Messages
174
Supports
Liverpool
Have you heard about any plans to scrap the CL, EL and Conference League? Why not?
Less of a travel around Europe, compared to going to the other part of the planet.

The clubs and UEFA follow rules laid down by the country. For example, last year's certain matches were played in neutral venues.
Easier for clubs to contain and monitor their players in one bubble.

Can't believe you are even making that comparison.
 

The Boy

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
4,333
Supports
Brighton and Hove Albion
In Conmebol's case, once the Copa in Colombia/Argentina was cancelled they could have had more qualifiers instead of setting one up in a rush in Brazil. Of course, no Conmebol FA would have voted that.
What I don't get is why they were effectively having an extra Copa America anyway. They had a Copa America in 2015 and 2016 and then again in 2019, so why was one schedule for 2020? And if it had to be delayed you're right given they'd had one the year before why didn't they cancel it?
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,171
Location
Montevideo
If a government decides for national health reasons to quarantine that's their perogative.
Of course it is. Oddly though, this week several clubs are going to visit or host foreign teams that didn't quarantine at all. Good thing we are hosting Young Boys and not PSG.

The clubs have decided not to release their players under the circumstances.
They don't have the right to do so, FIFA statutes make it crystal clear.

I think going forward they will still prefer to take the 5 day hit rather than the 14 day one.
Probably. They will make a fuss about it, but it's indeed a choice of government quarantine or FIFA sanction. Can't have their cake and eat it.

Maybe they should have put more consideration and tried to work out options with the NTs? They didn't, they just decided they paid the wages so NTs could go feck themselves.

Despite Ole making a pig's ear of it in public with his Norway reference, I do know privately the club made a pretty good case, which was the reason Cavani didn't get called up in the first place.

Everyone just trying to do whats best for themselves with no easy solutions if government wont change their policy.
We have the first secretaries of Foreign Affairs and Health both tasked with the Free Cavani mission. We actually know whose job (and political win/loss) it is to sort this out :lol:
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,171
Location
Montevideo
Less of a travel around Europe, compared to going to the other part of the planet.

The clubs and UEFA follow rules laid down by the country. For example, last year's certain matches were played in neutral venues.
Easier for clubs to contain and monitor their players in one bubble.

Can't believe you are even making that comparison.
Shorter distances but bigger numbers, more frequently and less efficiently (one game, not three). Maybe they should just scrap it and play the entire CL/EL/Conference inside a month. Some Covid-free country could host it all. Bizarre nobody suggested this, from what I read it's the solution to international football.

Or maybe the UK government should trust the clubs to handle it well and safely, as you say above. It's not regular John Doe travellers that get home and then go to the local Asda to fill the fridge, then off to a pub to scream loudly at people.