gaffs
Full Member
The club has more than enough money to spend this summer. We even had about £70m on the side for Baleba last summer, or Semenyo in January. What I proposed should most likely be within reach. We just finished third, have Champions League money coming in, a new sponsor, Casemiro's enormous wage off the books and even some sellable assets. If we don't spend heavily this summer, we never will. Trying to do this on the cheap and without signing some of the very best players around, will make catching up with the two teams ahead of us nearly impossible. We don't have Fergie anymore, who was able to polish a Glazer'fied turd for several years without losing too much ground.
Did we have £70m for Baleba? Where are you getting that info from?
And if we had £70m for Baleba, why did the club put the Sesko purchase on the revolving credit facility?
And i disagree that we have "sellable assets". Which players are liquid? Zirkzee and Ugarte will be tough sales as everyone knows they are unwanted and unfit for Premier League football. They will end up being loan to buy deals from an Italian club.
Last year we had players to sell in Hojlund, Rashford, Garnacho etc.
I mean who knows what will happen in the end. I speculated before, that Anderson might also not move at all. I doubt even City will go near him at Forest's £125m valuation. I also said Anderson's not worth anything too far north of £95-100m and even that is a reach. But in this market, if you want the best players, you have to pay through the nose sometimes. Just look at that Gordon-Barcelona deal. Daylight robbery, in my opinion.
We wont be buying Anderson. What we have to spend, which i bet will not exceed 200m, will be spread across 5 or 6 players.
