Endrick

Will Real be open to loan deal though?
If youre his agent what would you do? Mbappe is 27 and the striker. Vini is 26 and signing a new deal. So that's left wing gone. They just spent £110mil on diomande for the right wing. Rodrygo has yet to come back from injury.

Where would he get the game time for his development at Madrid? Especially under results orientated Mourinho who doesn't give two hoots about young player development.

We definitely need someone as an alternative to Sesko who isn't rashford.

A loan to Utd would make sense especially as Cunha and Santos (fellow Brazilians) are here.
 
If youre his agent what would you do? Mbappe is 27 and the striker. Vini is 26 and signing a new deal. So that's left wing gone. They just spent £110mil on diomande for the right wing. Rodrygo has yet to come back from injury.

Where would he get the game time for his development at Madrid? Especially under results orientated Mourinho who doesn't give two hoots about young player development.

We definitely need someone as an alternative to Sesko who isn't rashford.

A loan to Utd would make sense especially as Cunha and Santos (fellow Brazilians) are here.
Yeah and Casemiro would big up Utd as well if he asked
 
I think this guy and Vini and Rodrigo and Ralphinha will spearhead Brazil’s attack moving forward in next 5 years.
 
How good is he with the ball at feet? From the little bits I’ve seem his technique is a little loose but he’s got that got that insane pop in his shot ala Greenwood. Might be worth a loan. Not sure about this as a full transfer.
 
How good is he with the ball at feet? From the little bits I’ve seem his technique is a little loose but he’s got that got that insane pop in his shot ala Greenwood. Might be worth a loan. Not sure about this as a full transfer.
Yeah a loan would help to give us a better idea
 
knowing united they would only want a perm deal which IMO would be foolish....loan deal would be perfect with an option to purchase at the end of the deal
Yup.

He can finally play at his idols club.
 
A successful loan (even without an option) can easily still result in a permanent transfer too.
 
We can offer him a striker spot. The scousers will want him for the wing.
Villa would be his best bet for minutes.
 
Evan Guessand started the Bayern Munich friendly on the right wing so safe to say he'd be a significant upgrade.:lol:

Would imagine it would be us and Spurs as front runners. I understand the Man. United pleas but you do have Mbuemo and Amad who can already do the right and play CF thing. And if midfield is fit then Mount can cover right in emergency.

Liverpool link is odd but then so much of their transfer business in last year just feels random.
 
We can offer him a striker spot. The scousers will want him for the wing.
Villa would be his best bet for minutes.
From what I've read elsewhere his demands are a guaranteed starting spot as a N9.

Safe to say that's us out of this.
 
Evan Guessand started the Bayern Munich friendly on the right wing so safe to say he'd be a significant upgrade.:lol:

Would imagine it would be us and Spurs as front runners. I understand the Man. United pleas but you do have Mbuemo and Amad who can already do the right and play CF thing. And if midfield is fit then Mount can cover right in emergency.

Liverpool link is odd but then so much of their transfer business in last year just feels random.
Not sure Amad can really play cf tbh but I do agree that you would probably be the best move for him if he was focused on his development. Could see him playing both rw and up front for you depending on the game and rotation/injuries.
 
A successful loan (even without an option) can easily still result in a permanent transfer too.
Also, beggers can't be choosers.

His salary is extremely low, we can probably get a reasonable loan fee. Why would we not want to have a quality striker helping Sesko even if it is for just one year? Somebody like Endrick can make the difference between us staying in Champions League in the coming season or finishing outside UCL. That's a huge deal and a matter of 100M income. If Endrick costs us 10-15M and helps us secure 100M, not to mention the pleasure of staying in UCL, WHY THE HECK would we pass on such chance?

They don't want to pay big money to buy players, and they also don't want to loan them when we get a chance to? So, signing 30-40M players and not enough of them is the only thing we do? How are we any different from fecking Everton?
 
No one on the premiership is giving him that for sure.
I don’t know about the relegation battle sides. If one of them heavily lacks a striker they might be happy to offer him that.

His salary is extremely low, we can probably get a reasonable loan fee. Why would we not want to have a quality striker helping Sesko even if it is for just one year? Somebody like Endrick can make the difference between us staying in Champions League in the coming season or finishing outside UCL. That's a huge deal and a matter of 100M income. If Endrick costs us 10-15M and helps us secure 100M, not to mention the pleasure of staying in UCL, WHY THE HECK would we pass on such chance?
Have we fallen so low that we waste resources developing players for Real Madrid now? He’s still very raw and is not going to be a game changer for us if he’s just to stay for one season. So a loan without a buy option doesn’t really make much sense at all. I’d happily take him on a permanent deal however.
 
I don’t know about the relegation battle sides. If one of them heavily lacks a striker they might be happy to offer him that.


Have we fallen so low that we waste resources developing players for Real Madrid now? He’s still very raw and is not going to be a game changer for us if he’s just to stay for one season. So a loan without a buy option doesn’t really make much sense at all. I’d happily take him on a permanent deal however.
Mate, of course we have! Look who we have signed so far. And which EPL teams have spent more than we have, already. Actually we have fallen even lower than that, if we don't loan him to stay in UCL we would be starting the season with a single striker who by the way is injured and missing the pre-season so won't be even fully fit for the opening game

It is very clear that United is not planning to pay for DMF, LB and a striker. And LB is top priority, DMF next one, so there's really no budget to buy striker in this window. At least not based on how much INEOS wants to spend. So loan is our only chance

Would you rather have Endrick as Sesko backup for a year, or not? Regardless of whether it's loan or whatever. That is the only question. We have no other good options
 
Sesko with Endrick playing off him is a football manager fever dream
They probably wouldn't both be on as a striker unless we were chasing a game.
We're best geared for one striker in front of two inside forwards.
 
His problem at Real is game time. He’d get more with us than them but he’d hardly be the first name on the team sheet. If it’s a straight loan, somewhere like Villa or Spurs, where he’ll be first choice would make more sense.

Would be very happy if he did come to us though, could be a real wild card of a signing.
 
Becoming a nursery home for Madrid talent with no equity? No thanks. I'd rather give our youth those minutes. Good deal for clubs like Villa though.
Right, so you'd see us turn down adding better options to the squad because of some insecurity complex
 
Add Moukoko and we're guaranteed to win a treble. I should know, that's how I won mine

That's totally fair. He's still a fairly good player in that universe but Endrick is a greenwood level prospect for lack of a better way to describe, that's the level of player you want trying to force their way into your team. Lethal, could be the biggest star on your team if they get going.
 
Id take him and I love this picture
images
 
Right, so you'd see us turn down adding better options to the squad because of some insecurity complex
Bringing him in shows a lack of strategic thinking. We're in a building phase, the only players we should be bringing in are young players who can become world class for us or excellent players who can come in, contribute right away and help develop our youngsters. He is neither. it's really that simple.
 
Bringing him in shows a lack of strategic thinking. We're in a building phase, the only players we should be bringing in are young players who can become world class for us or excellent players who can come in, contribute right away and help develop our youngsters. He is neither. it's really that simple.
He's a talented player who would add strength in depth to our squad. That's only a good thing, whether it's for one season or not
 
Becoming a nursery home for Madrid talent with no equity? No thanks. I'd rather give our youth those minutes. Good deal for clubs like Villa though.
We were a feeder club for Madrid before with beckham, van nistelrooy and Ronaldo. We aren't on their level, nowhere near it. Haven't won the title in 14 years and been to a CL final in 18 years

I'd take what I could get for now, if he helps the club with CL qualification then great.
 
We were a feeder club for Madrid before with beckham, van nistelrooy and Ronaldo. We aren't on their level, nowhere near it. Haven't won the title in 14 years and been to a CL final in 18 years

I'd take what I could get for now, if he helps the club with CL qualification then great.
Now here's an inferiority complex. Of those three, the only one that left in prime was Ronaldo. The other two were players Fergie was happy to see the back of.